0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Editorials |

Brief Interventions for Problem Drinking: Another Piece of the Puzzle

Patrick G. O'Connor, MD, MPH
[+] Article and Author Information

From Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.


Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.

Requests for Single Reprints: Patrick G. O'Connor, MD, MPH, Section of General Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208025, New Haven, CT 06520; e-mail, patrick.oconnor@yale.edu.


Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(3):223-225. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-146-3-200702060-00012
Text Size: A A A

Problem drinking has been associated with a wide variety of serious health and social problems (1), along with more than 100 000 deaths per year and an annual economic cost of more than $180 billion in the United States alone (2). The impact of these problems has motivated leaders in government and science to support research on screening and treatment strategies for patients with problem drinking (3). On the basis of this research, the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) has published recommendations for identifying patients with problem drinking and treating them individually according to their pattern of alcohol use (4). “At-risk” or “hazardous” drinkers are men who drink 5 or more drinks per day or 15 or more drinks per week and women who drink 4 or more drinks per day or 8 or more drinks per week. According to the NIAAA, about 3 in 10 U.S. adults drink at these risky levels and approximately 1 in 4 of these heavy drinkers meet DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition) criteria for alcohol abuse or alcohol dependence (4).

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Brief Intervention in Alcoholism as a Paradigm for Where We Went Wrong
Posted on March 5, 2007
Mark Antony LaPorta
Independent Professor of Medicine, North Miami, FL
Conflict of Interest: None Declared

A long time ago, Dr. Osler told us to listen to the patient. He meant "sensitively." Sometimes we do, and we elicit issues that might have gone undetected with limitless technology or process. Other times, we don't listen or we can't hear.

While I must agree with Dr. O'Connor that the accompanying lead article was brilliantly conceived and precisely executed, however, the whole idea missed the main point: ask the happiest survivors of alcoholism and its consequences how they found a way to health and freedom. They will almost all tell you the same thing: someone told them about Alcoholics Anonymous and the Twelve Steps.

Essentially, my patients -- and members of many communities -- tell me that no matter how process-driven, thoughtful, well-intentioned, or even forceful a healthcare team member was, the professional intervener didn't have a chance until they simply made the referral to someone who'd already been through it and came out the other side. Active alcoholics -- connoted by the consequences of their own actions, and therefore scalable to many other addictive, behavioral, emotional and mental maladies -- cannot be made to "snap" into understanding because denial causes blindness, but may be able to agree to make one single visit to someone who has recovered. That is where their hope lies, one day at a time. Not in pills, despite a recent spate of attempts, and not in money,grants, formats, lectures, or our trained proxies. "Institutionalization" is a multidimensional and multifaceted hazard, especially to an idea.

In addition, any medical professional who puts that s/he has "no financial incentive" or conflicting issues, is, to put it politely, delusional.

Conflict of Interest:

None declared

Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)