0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Editorials |

Is There a Personal Doctor in the House?

Andrew B. Bindman, MD
[+] Article and Author Information

From San Francisco General Hospital and the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143.


Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.

Requests for Single Reprints: Andrew B. Bindman, MD, San Francisco General Hospital and University of California, San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Avenue, Building 10/Ward 13, San Francisco, CA 94110; e-mail, abindman@medsfgh.ucsf.edu.


Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(5):351-352. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-150-5-200903030-00012
Text Size: A A A

Primary care medical specialty societies, including the American College of Physicians, promote the patient-centered medical home as a way to improve the U.S. health care system (1). Some of the principles of a patient-centered medical home include a personal physician, a physician-directed medical team, a whole-person orientation, care coordination, a commitment to quality and safety, and the provision of enhanced access (2). These themes are highly recognizable elements of previously published definitions of primary care (34). The novelty is in the linkage of these concepts to a business proposition. Primary care advocates contend that they should be better paid to do these functions because an adequately funded, patient-centered medical home can be a cost-effective delivery model that can reduce the need for specialty and emergency department visits as well as hospitalizations (5). Payers, including Medicare, are receptive to enhanced payment for primary care as long as practices demonstrate that they adhere to the principles of a medical home and can in fact reduce overall health care costs (6). Work is under way to create measures validating a primary care practice's claim that it functions as a medical home (7) and to test whether primary care medical homes are truly cost-effective in demonstration projects (8).

First Page Preview

View Large
/>
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)