Summaries for Patients |

Control of Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes in the United States: Trends in Disparities and Effects of Medicare Coverage FREE

[+] Article, Author, and Disclosure Information

The summary below is from the full report titled “Differences in Control of Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes by Race, Ethnicity, and Education: U.S. Trends From 1999 to 2006 and Effects of Medicare Coverage.” It is in the 21 April 2009 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 150, pages 505-515). The authors are J.M. McWilliams, E. Meara, A.M. Zaslavsky, and J.Z. Ayanian.

Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(8):I-26. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-150-8-200904210-00001
Text Size: A A A

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

Research shows that the health care that patients receive and its outcomes differ between racial and ethnic groups. Researchers are now trying to understand why these differences exist and how to reduce or eliminate them. A key question is whether improving the quality of care will narrow the gaps between patients from different racial and ethnic groups.

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

To see if improvement in the quality of care for several common conditions has reduced gaps between racial and ethnic groups in the outcome of that care, and if access to universal health insurance—which occurs at age 65 years, when eligible for the U.S. Medicare system—has reduced gaps in the outcomes of care for different racial and ethnic groups.

Who was studied?

Men and women who participated in the government-sponsored National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and had hypertension, diabetes, or coronary heart disease. The participants are representative of the U.S. population. They provided information about their medical history; had a physical examination; and received many tests, including tests to measure the status of their condition. After the identity of individuals is concealed, this information becomes available for health care researchers.

How was the study done?

For each person, the authors determined if hypertension, diabetes, or coronary heart disease was well controlled by using standard definitions of adequate disease control. They then compared rates of disease control for 6 years (1999 to 2005) to see if the U.S. health care system was getting better at providing care for these common conditions. They compared disease control for persons age 40 to 64 years with persons age 65 to 85 years to see if disease control was better in those who had Medicare coverage.

What did the researchers find?

Control of hypertension, diabetes, or coronary heart disease greatly improved from 1999 to 2005. However, the differences between white and Hispanic or black patients did not change during this period. The gaps remained the same. On the other hand, the gaps between white patients and Hispanic or black patients who were 65 years or older (and were eligible for Medicare) were smaller than those for younger patients.

What were the limitations of the study?

The NHANES does not provide information about how a person changes over time. To evaluate the effect of age on gaps in disease control, it is necessary to compare groups of patients who differ in age and might differ in other important ways.

What are the implications of the study?

Improving the quality of care without improving access to care does not seem to reduce gaps in the outcomes experienced by different racial and ethnic groups. All racial or ethnic groups get better to the same degree. On the other hand, providing universal access to health insurance seems to narrow gaps in care that minority racial and ethnic groups receive. The findings imply that to narrow gaps in the outcome of health care that minority racial and ethnic groups receive, the United States will have to provide universal access to health care.





Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).


Submit a Comment/Letter
Submit a Comment/Letter

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.


Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.