Download citation file:
From the University of Florida College of Medicine and the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Gainesville, Florida, and the Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Grant Support: By National Institutes of Health grants R01 DK47981 and R01 DK075065 (Dr. Kone), R01 DK49750 and the Department of Veterans Affairs (Dr. Wingo), R01 DK34316 (Dr. McDonough), and R21 DK080233 (Dr. Youn).
Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.
Requests for Single Reprints: Bruce C. Kone, MD, University of Florida College of Medicine, 1600 Southwest Archer Road, Gainesville, FL 32610; e-mail, firstname.lastname@example.org.
Current Author Addresses: Ms. Greenlee and Drs. Wingo and Kone: University of Florida College of Medicine, 1600 Southwest Archer Road, Gainesville, FL 32610.
Drs. McDonough and Youn: University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, 1333 San Pablo Street, Los Angeles, CA 90089.
Humans are intermittently exposed to large variations in potassium intake, which range from periods of fasting to ingestion of potassium-rich meals. These fluctuations would abruptly alter plasma potassium concentration if not for rapid mechanisms, primarily in skeletal muscle and the liver, that buffer the changes in plasma potassium concentration by means of transcellular potassium redistribution and feedback control of renal potassium excretion. However, buffers have capacity limits, and even robust feedback control mechanisms require that the perturbation occur before feedback can initiate corrective action. In contrast, feedforward control mechanisms sense the effect of disturbances on the system's homeostasis. This review highlights recent experimental insights into the participation of feedback and feedforward control mechanisms in potassium homeostasis. New data make clear that feedforward homeostatic responses activate when decreased potassium intake is sensed, even when plasma potassium concentration is still within the normal range and before frank hypokalemia ensues, in addition to the classic feedback activation of renal potassium conservation when plasma potassium concentration decreases. Given the clinical importance of dyskalemias in patients, these novel experimental paradigms invite renewed clinical inquiry into this important area.
CNS = central nervous system. Left. Classic mechanisms. Right. Additional putative mechanisms.
We present a simplified model of potassium handling by collecting duct cell types. Principal cells in the collecting duct are responsible for secretion of excess potassium in the circulation into the tubule lumen and thus into the urine. This secretion is accomplished by luminal membrane potassium channels responding primarily to the electrochemical gradient for potassium generated by the combined actions of the basolateral membrane Na,K-ATPase and a luminal membrane sodium channel (the target of the potassium-sparing diuretic amiloride). In states of potassium depletion, potassium secretion by the principal cells is inhibited and the luminal membrane H,K-ATPase is activated in the intercalated cells to reclaim the potassium that remains in the tubular fluid, thereby limiting urinary potassium wasting. ADP = adenosine diphosphate; ATP = adenosine triphosphate; CCD = cortical collecting duct; DT = distal tubule; Glom = glomerulus; IMCD = inner medullary collecting duct; MTAL = medullary thick ascending limb of Henle loop; OMCD = outer medullary collecting duct; Pi = inorganic phosphate.
Please read the other comments before posting. Contributors must reveal any conflict
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of The American
College of Physicians editorial staff. Please be sure your email address is
updated in your account, otherwise the American College of Physicians will not be
able to contact you about your comment.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
(applies to the past 5 years and foreseeable future) Indicate any potential conflicts
of interest of each author below, including specific financial interests and relationships
and affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript
(eg, employment/affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria, speakers
bureau, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical
equipment, or patents filed, received, or pending). If all authors have none, check
"No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please
also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will
be posted with your response.
The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College
of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property
incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP.
The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and
only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities.
Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their
own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way
or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs
for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce
or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending
them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing
them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in
any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized
use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.
to gain full access to the content and tools.
Learn more about subscription options