0
Summaries for Patients |

A New Diabetes Screening Score FREE

[+] Article and Author Information

The summary below is from the full report titled “Development and Validation of a Patient Self-assessment Score for Diabetes Risk.” It is in the 1 December 2009 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 151, pages 775-783). The authors are H. Bang, A.M. Edwards, A.S. Bomback, C.M. Ballantyne, D. Brillon, M.A. Callahan, S.M. Teutsch, A.I. Mushlin, and L.M. Kern.


Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(11):I-27-I-28. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-11-200912010-00001
Text Size: A A A

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

Diabetes interferes with the body's ability to store energy from food. The pancreas makes a substance called insulin, which helps the body store energy from food. Type 1 diabetes (juvenile diabetes) occurs when the pancreas stops making insulin. In type 2 diabetes (adult-onset diabetes), the body makes plenty of insulin but cannot use it normally. In both cases, the result is high blood sugar levels. Over time, high blood sugar levels can lead to blindness, kidney failure, nerve damage, and heart disease. Good care with diet, exercise, and medications can prevent complications. Type 1 diabetes usually does not go long before being diagnosed. However, many people with type 2 diabetes have it for years before symptoms begin.

Testing people who have no symptoms to try to detect type 2 diabetes early is called screening. Screening for diabetes involves blood tests to look for high blood sugar levels. Experts disagree about who should be screened for diabetes. Screening all adults would be expensive, and many people would have a false-positive result, which is a test result that says a disease is present when it actually is not.

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

To develop a screening score for diabetes that people could complete on their own to help them decide whether they were at high risk for diabetes and should see a doctor to have blood sugar measured.

Who was studied?

Participants from 1 large national study and 3 other studies.

How was the study done?

The researchers examined the relationship between patient factors and the presence of undiagnosed diabetes in participants from 1 study to see which factors could best predict who had diabetes according to blood tests. They then tested the score by applying it to participants in the other 3 studies.

What did the researchers find?

Age, sex, family history of diabetes, personal history of high blood pressure, obesity, and physical activity could identify people at high risk for diabetes. This score is shown in the Figure on the reverse of this summary. It seems to work better than other available scores.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure.
Self-assessment screening score for undiagnosed diabetes or prediabetes.
Grahic Jump Location

What were the limitations of the study?

The score did not include information on whether women had diabetes during pregnancy, which might have improved the score.

What are the implications of the study?

This new scoring system may help people decide whether they should see their doctors for blood sugar tests.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure.
Self-assessment screening score for undiagnosed diabetes or prediabetes.
Grahic Jump Location

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Related Point of Care
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)