0

The full content of Annals is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >
Editorials |

Empirical Methods in Bioethics: A Cautionary Tale

Clarence H. Braddock III, MD, MPH; and David Magnus, PhD
[+] Article and Author Information

From Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA 94305-5475, and Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5475.


Potential Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed. Forms can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M10-0293.

Requests for Single Reprints: Clarence H. Braddock III, MD, MPH, Division of General Internal Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, MSOB, Room X210, MC 5475, 251 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5475; e-mail, cbrad@stanford.edu.

Current Author Addresses: Dr. Braddock: Division of General Internal Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Medical School Office Building, Room X210, MC 5475, 251 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5475.

Dr. Magnus: Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, 701 Welch Road, #1105, Palo Alto, CA 94305.


Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(6):396-397. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-152-6-201003160-00011
Text Size: A A A

Bioethicists and others have argued about the proper role for empirical research in addressing ethical concerns because of the increased use of social science, health services, and outcomes research methods in the medical ethics domain. In fact, a long tradition in normative ethics, the branch of ethics that seeks to make definitive arguments about what we ought to do, scoffs at attempting to derive conclusions about what one ought to do from empirical observations about what people actually do (12).

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Letters

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Comments

Submit a Comment
Submit a Comment

Summary for Patients

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

Toolkit

Buy Now

to gain full access to the content and tools.

Want to Subscribe?

Learn more about subscription options

Advertisement
Related Articles
Topic Collections
PubMed Articles
Editorial note: Tribute to Edmund Pellegrino. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2014;24(2):vii-viii.
Forgot your password?
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
(Required)
(Required)