<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/">
  <channel>
    <title>Annals of Internal Medicine: Breast Cancer Topic Collection</title>
    <link>http://annals.org/</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 20:47:43 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Silverchair</generator>
    <managingEditor>editor@annals.org</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@annals.org</webMaster>
    <item>
      <title>Short-Term Outcomes of Screening Mammography Using Computer-Aided Detection A Population-Based Study of Medicare Enrollees </title>
      <link>http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleID=1676453</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Fenton JJ, Xing G, Elmore JG, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;Chinese translation&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Background:&lt;/div&gt;Computer-aided detection (CAD) has rapidly diffused into screening mammography practice despite limited and conflicting data on its clinical effect.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objective:&lt;/div&gt;To determine associations between CAD use during screening mammography and the incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive breast cancer, invasive cancer stage, and diagnostic testing.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Design:&lt;/div&gt;Retrospective cohort study.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Setting:&lt;/div&gt;Medicare program.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Participants:&lt;/div&gt;Women aged 67 to 89 years having screening mammography between 2001 and 2006 in U.S. SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) regions (409 459 mammograms from 163 099 women).&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Measurements:&lt;/div&gt;Incident DCIS and invasive breast cancer within 1 year after mammography, invasive cancer stage, and diagnostic testing within 90 days after screening among women without breast cancer.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results:&lt;/div&gt;From 2001 to 2006, CAD prevalence increased from 3.6% to 60.5%. Use of CAD was associated with greater DCIS incidence (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.17 [95% CI, 1.11 to 1.23]) but no difference in invasive breast cancer incidence (adjusted OR, 1.00 [CI, 0.97 to 1.03]). Among women with invasive cancer, CAD was associated with greater likelihood of stage I to II versus III to IV cancer (adjusted OR, 1.27 [CI, 1.14 to 1.41]). In women without breast cancer, CAD was associated with increased odds of diagnostic mammography (adjusted OR, 1.28 [CI, 1.27 to 1.29]), breast ultrasonography (adjusted OR, 1.07 [CI, 1.06 to 1.09]), and breast biopsy (adjusted OR, 1.10 [CI, 1.08 to 1.12]).&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Limitation:&lt;/div&gt;Short follow-up for cancer stage, potential unmeasured confounding, and uncertain generalizability to younger women.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/div&gt;Use of CAD during screening mammography among Medicare enrollees is associated with increased DCIS incidence, the diagnosis of invasive breast cancer at earlier stages, and increased diagnostic testing among women without breast cancer.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Primary Funding Source:&lt;/div&gt;Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California, Davis.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleID=1676453</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Use of Medications to Reduce Risk for Primary Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force</title>
      <link>http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleID=1676456</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Nelson HD, Smith M, Griffin JC, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Background:&lt;/div&gt;Medications to reduce risk for primary breast cancer are recommended for women at increased risk; however, use is low.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Purpose:&lt;/div&gt;To update evidence about the effectiveness and adverse effects of medications to reduce breast cancer risk, patient use of such medications, and methods for identifying women at increased risk for breast cancer.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Data Sources:&lt;/div&gt;MEDLINE and Cochrane databases (through 5 December 2012), Scopus, Web of Science, clinical trial registries, and reference lists.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Study Selection:&lt;/div&gt;English-language randomized trials of medication effectiveness and adverse effects, observational studies of adverse effects and patient use, and diagnostic accuracy studies of risk assessment.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Data Extraction:&lt;/div&gt;Investigators independently extracted data on participants, study design, analysis, follow-up, and results, and a second investigator confirmed key data. Investigators independently dual-rated study quality and applicability using established criteria.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Data Synthesis:&lt;/div&gt;Seven good- and fair-quality trials indicated that tamoxifen and raloxifene reduced incidence of invasive breast cancer by 7 to 9 cases in 1000 women over 5 years compared with placebo. New results from STAR (Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene) showed that tamoxifen reduced breast cancer incidence more than raloxifene by 5 cases in 1000 women. Neither reduced breast cancer–specific or all-cause mortality rates. Both reduced the incidence of fractures, but tamoxifen increased the incidence of thromboembolic events more than raloxifene by 4 cases in 1000 women. Tamoxifen increased the incidence of endometrial cancer and cataracts compared with placebo and raloxifene. Trials provided limited and heterogeneous data on medication adherence and persistence. Many women do not take tamoxifen because of associated harms. Thirteen risk-stratification models were modest predictors of breast cancer.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Limitation:&lt;/div&gt;Data on mortality and adherence measures and for women who are nonwhite, are premenopausal, or have comorbid conditions were lacking.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/div&gt;Medications reduced the incidence of invasive breast cancer and fractures and increased the incidence of thromboembolic events. Tamoxifen was more effective than raloxifene but also increased the incidence of endometrial cancer and cataracts. Use is limited by adverse effects and inaccurate methods to identify candidates.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Primary Funding Source:&lt;/div&gt;Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleID=1676456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>