<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/">
  <channel>
    <title>Annals of Internal Medicine: Peptic Ulcer Topic Collection</title>
    <link>http://annals.org/</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:47:48 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Silverchair</generator>
    <managingEditor>editor@annals.org</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@annals.org</webMaster>
    <item>
      <title>Review: High-dose and non–high-dose proton pump inhibitors after endoscopic treatment do not differ for bleeding peptic ulcers</title>
      <link>http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleID=1032833</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Peterson WL. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Question&lt;/div&gt;In patients with bleeding peptic ulcers, do high-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) after endoscopic treatment reduce recurrent ulcer bleeding, surgical intervention, or mortality more than non–high-dose PPIs?&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Review scope&lt;/div&gt;Included studies compared high-dose PPIs with non–high-dose PPIs after endoscopic intervention in patients with endoscopically confirmed bleeding peptic ulcers. Doses of PPIs equivalent to 80-mg boluses of omeprazole or pantoprazole followed by continuous intravenous infusion of drug at 8 mg/h for 72 hours or continuous infusion doses &gt; 192 mg/d were considered high. Outcomes were endoscopically confirmed recurrent ulcer bleeding within 30 days of randomization, surgical intervention, and all-cause mortality.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Review methods&lt;/div&gt;MEDLINE, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, BioMedCentral, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Aug 2009), and reference lists were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with methodological quality ≥ 3 on the 5-point Jadad scale. 7 RCTs (&lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;n&lt;/span&gt; = 1157, mean age 62 y, 66% men) met the selection criteria. The number of patients in each study ranged from 25 to 474. 3 trials studied omeprazole, 3 used pantoprazole, and 1 used both; 2 studies were multicenter, and 3 were double-blind.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Main results&lt;/div&gt;Meta-analysis showed that groups did not differ for recurrent ulcer bleeding, surgical intervention, or mortality (Table). There was no significant statistical heterogeneity (I&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 0%; &lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;P&lt;/span&gt; = 0.74 to 0.90) across study results for any of the outcomes.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusion&lt;/div&gt;In patients with bleeding peptic ulcers, high-dose proton pump inhibitors and non–high-dose proton pump inhibitors after endoscopic treatment do not differ for recurrent ulcer bleeding, surgical intervention, or mortality.High-dose vs non–high-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for bleeding peptic ulcers*OutcomesNumber of trials (&lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;n&lt;/span&gt;)Weighted event ratesRRI (95% CI)NNH (CI)High-dose PPIsNon–high-dose PPIsRecurrent ulcer bleeding at 30 d7 (1157)13%10%26% (−11 to 75)Not significantSurgical intervention6 (1052)2.6%1.7%48% (−34 to 224)Not significantRRR (CI)NNT (CI)All-cause mortality at 30 d or in hospital6 (1052)1.9%2.1%11% (−108 to 62)Not significant*Abbreviations defined in Glossary. Weighted event rates, RRI, RRR, NNH, NNT, and CI calculated from control event rates and odds ratios in article.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleID=1032833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>