<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/">
  <channel>
    <title>Annals of Internal Medicine: Mechanical Ventilation Topic Collection</title>
    <link>http://annals.org/</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:47:27 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Silverchair</generator>
    <managingEditor>editor@annals.org</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@annals.org</webMaster>
    <item>
      <title>Early Percutaneous Tracheotomy Versus Prolonged Intubation of Mechanically Ventilated Patients After Cardiac Surgery A Randomized Trial *  </title>
      <link>http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleID=746881</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Trouillet J, Luyt C, Guiguet M, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Background:&lt;/div&gt;Whether early percutaneous tracheotomy in patients who require prolonged mechanical ventilation can shorten mechanical ventilation duration and lower mortality remains controversial.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objective:&lt;/div&gt;To compare the outcomes of severely ill patients who require prolonged mechanical ventilation randomly assigned to early percutaneous tracheotomy or prolonged intubation.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Design:&lt;/div&gt;Prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center trial (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00347321).&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Setting:&lt;/div&gt;Academic center.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Patients:&lt;/div&gt;216 adults requiring mechanical ventilation 4 or more days after cardiac surgery.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Intervention:&lt;/div&gt;Immediate early percutaneous tracheotomy or prolonged intubation with tracheotomy 15 days after randomization.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Measurements:&lt;/div&gt;The primary end point was the number of ventilator-free days during the first 60 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included 28-, 60-, or 90-day mortality rates; durations of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, and hospitalization; sedative, analgesic, and neuroleptic use; ventilator-associated pneumonia rate; unscheduled extubations; comfort and ease of care; and long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and psychosocial evaluations.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results:&lt;/div&gt;There was no difference in ventilator-free days during the first 60 days after randomization between early percutaneous tracheotomy and prolonged intubation groups (mean, 30.4 days [SD, 22.4] vs. 28.3 days [SD, 23.7], respectively; absolute difference, 2.1 days [95% CI, −4.1 to 8.3 days]) nor in 28-, 60-, or 90-day mortality rates (16% vs. 21%, 26% vs. 28%, and 30% vs. 30%, respectively). The durations of mechanical ventilation and hospitalization, as well as frequencies of ventilator-associated pneumonia and other severe infections, were also similar. However, early percutaneous tracheotomy was associated with less intravenous sedation; less time of heavy sedation; less haloperidol use for agitation, delirium, or both; fewer unscheduled extubations; better comfort and ease of care; and earlier resumption of oral nutrition. After a median follow-up of 873 days, between-group survival, psychosocial evaluations, and HRQoL were similar.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Limitation:&lt;/div&gt;The prolonged intubation group had more ventilator-free days during days 1 to 60 than what was hypothesized (mean, 23.0 days [SD, 17.0]).&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/div&gt;Early tracheotomy provided no benefit in terms of mechanical ventilation and length of hospital stay, rates of mortality or infectious complications, and long-term HRQoL for patients who require prolonged mechanical ventilation after cardiac surgery. However, the well-tolerated procedure was associated with less sedation, better comfort, and earlier resumption of autonomy.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Primary Funding Source:&lt;/div&gt;French Ministry of Health.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleID=746881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>