<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/">
  <channel>
    <title>Annals of Internal Medicine Online First</title>
    <link>http://annals.org/aim</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 17:43:29 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Silverchair</generator>
    <managingEditor>editor@annals.org</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@annals.org</webMaster>
    <item rdf="http://annals.org/aim/article/2636749/annals-ages-annals-internal-medicine-turns-90">
      <title> Annals  for the Ages:  Annals of Internal Medicine  Turns 90</title>
      <link>http://annals.org/aim/article/2636749/annals-ages-annals-internal-medicine-turns-90</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Lundberg GD. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;In July 2017, &lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;Annals of Internal Medicine&lt;/span&gt; celebrates 90 years of continuous publication. Recognizing the occasion, the editorialist provides reflections on the history and future of medical journals.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://annals.org/aim/article/2636749/annals-ages-annals-internal-medicine-turns-90</guid>
    </item>
    <item rdf="http://annals.org/aim/article/2636750/high-generic-drug-prices-market-competition-retrospective-cohort-study">
      <title>High Generic Drug Prices and Market Competition A Retrospective Cohort Study </title>
      <link>http://annals.org/aim/article/2636750/high-generic-drug-prices-market-competition-retrospective-cohort-study</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Dave CV, Kesselheim AS, Fox ER, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Background:&lt;/div&gt;Prices for some generic drugs have increased in recent years, adversely affecting patients who rely on them.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objective:&lt;/div&gt;To determine the association between market competition levels and the change in generic drug prices in the United States.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Design:&lt;/div&gt;Retrospective cohort study.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Setting:&lt;/div&gt;Prescription claims from commercial health plans between 2008 and 2013.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Measurements:&lt;/div&gt;The 5.5 years of data were divided into 11 study periods of 6 months each. The Herfindahl–Hirschman Index (HHI)—calculated by summing the squares of individual manufacturers' market shares, with higher values indicating a less competitive market—and average drug prices were estimated for the generic drugs in each period. The HHI value estimated in the baseline period (first half of 2008) was modeled as a fixed covariate. Models estimated price changes over time by level of competition, adjusting for drug shortages, market size, and dosage forms.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results:&lt;/div&gt;From 1.08 billion prescription claims, a cohort of 1120 generic drugs was identified. After adjustment, drugs with quadropoly (HHI value of 2500, indicating relatively high levels of competition), duopoly (HHI value of 5000), near-monopoly (HHI value of 8000), and monopoly (HHI value of 10 000) levels of baseline competition were associated with price changes of −31.7% (95% CI, −34.4% to −28.9%), −11.8% (CI, −18.6% to −4.4%), 20.1% (CI, 5.5% to 36.6%), and 47.4% (CI, 25.4% to 73.2%), respectively, over the study period.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Limitation:&lt;/div&gt;Study findings may not be generalizable to drugs that became generic after 2008.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/div&gt;Market competition levels were associated with a change in generic drug prices. Such measurements may be helpful in identifying older prescription drugs at higher risk for price change in the future.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Primary Funding Source:&lt;/div&gt;None.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://annals.org/aim/article/2636750/high-generic-drug-prices-market-competition-retrospective-cohort-study</guid>
    </item>
    <item rdf="http://annals.org/aim/article/2636751/increasing-incidence-multiply-recurrent-clostridium-difficile-infection-united-states-cohort">
      <title>Increasing Incidence of Multiply Recurrent  Clostridium difficile  Infection in the United States A Cohort Study </title>
      <link>http://annals.org/aim/article/2636751/increasing-incidence-multiply-recurrent-clostridium-difficile-infection-united-states-cohort</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Ma GK, Brensinger CM, Wu Q, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Background:&lt;/div&gt;&lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;Clostridium difficile&lt;/span&gt; infection (CDI), the most common health care–associated infection, often recurs. Fecal microbiota transplantation is increasingly used to treat multiply recurrent CDI (mrCDI).&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objective:&lt;/div&gt;To determine whether the incidence of mrCDI is increasing in proportion to CDI and to identify risk factors for mrCDI.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Design:&lt;/div&gt;Retrospective cohort study.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Setting:&lt;/div&gt;United States.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Participants:&lt;/div&gt;38 911 718 commercially insured patients in the OptumInsight Clinformatics Database, of whom 45 341 developed CDI.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Measurements:&lt;/div&gt;Age- and sex-standardized incidence rates for CDI and mrCDI.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results:&lt;/div&gt;From 2001 to 2012, the annual incidence of CDI and mrCDI per 1000 person-years increased by 42.7% (from 0.4408 to 0.6289 case) and 188.8% (from 0.0107 to 0.0309 case), respectively. The increase in mrCDI incidence was independent of known risk factors for CDI. Those who developed mrCDI were older (median age, 56.0 vs. 49.0 years; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] per 10-year increase in age, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.21 to 1.29]) and were more likely to be female (63.8% vs. 58.7%; aOR, 1.24 [CI, 1.11 to 1.38]) and to have used antibiotics (72.3% vs. 58.8%; aOR, 1.79 [CI, 1.59 to 2.01]), proton-pump inhibitors (24.6% vs. 18.2%; aOR, 1.14 [CI, 1.01 to 1.29]), or corticosteroids (18.3% vs. 13.7%; aOR, 1.15 [CI, 1.00 to 1.32]) within 90 days of CDI diagnosis. Chronic kidney disease (10.4% vs. 5.6%; aOR, 1.49 [CI, 1.24 to 1.80]) and diagnosis in a nursing home (2.1% vs. 0.6%; aOR, 1.99 [CI, 1.34 to 2.93]) were also associated with increased risk for mrCDI.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Limitation:&lt;/div&gt;The primary analyses included only commercially insured patients in the United States.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/div&gt;Relative to CDI, mrCDI incidence has disproportionately increased, indicating a rising demand for mrCDI therapies.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Primary Funding Source:&lt;/div&gt;National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://annals.org/aim/article/2636751/increasing-incidence-multiply-recurrent-clostridium-difficile-infection-united-states-cohort</guid>
    </item>
    <item rdf="http://annals.org/aim/article/2636752/fool-me-thrice-evolving-story-multiply-recurrent-clostridium-difficile-infection">
      <title>Fool Me Thrice: The Evolving Story of Multiply Recurrent  Clostridium difficile  Infection</title>
      <link>http://annals.org/aim/article/2636752/fool-me-thrice-evolving-story-multiply-recurrent-clostridium-difficile-infection</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Saini SD, Waljee AK. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;Ma and colleagues report a retrospective cohort study to address gaps in our knowledge about multiply recurrent &lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;Clostridium difficile&lt;/span&gt; infection (mrCDI). The editorialists discuss the findings, the limitations of the study, and why a better understanding of the epidemiology of mrCDI is a critical first step toward developing a sound strategy to address this growing public health challenge.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://annals.org/aim/article/2636752/fool-me-thrice-evolving-story-multiply-recurrent-clostridium-difficile-infection</guid>
    </item>
    <item rdf="http://annals.org/aim/article/2636753/association-firearm-suicide-mental-illness-substance-use-conditions-previous-suicide">
      <title>The Association of Firearm Suicide With Mental Illness, Substance Use Conditions, and Previous Suicide Attempts</title>
      <link>http://annals.org/aim/article/2636753/association-firearm-suicide-mental-illness-substance-use-conditions-previous-suicide</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Boggs JM, Simon GE, Ahmedani BK, et al. </author>
      <description />
      <guid>http://annals.org/aim/article/2636753/association-firearm-suicide-mental-illness-substance-use-conditions-previous-suicide</guid>
    </item>
    <item rdf="http://annals.org/aim/article/2633843/consort-extension-chinese-herbal-medicine-formulas-2017-recommendations-explanation-elaboration">
      <title>CONSORT Extension for Chinese Herbal Medicine Formulas 2017: Recommendations, Explanation, and Elaboration</title>
      <link>http://annals.org/aim/article/2633843/consort-extension-chinese-herbal-medicine-formulas-2017-recommendations-explanation-elaboration</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Cheng C, Wu T, Shang H, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) formulas are the major components of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) interventions. The general reporting quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CHM formulas is disappointing, although CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement extensions for herbal medicinal interventions and acupuncture interventions are available. A group of TCM clinical experts, methodologists, epidemiologists, and editors has developed this CONSORT Extension for CHM Formulas (CONSORT-CHM Formulas 2017) through a comprehensive process, including publication of the draft version, solicitation of comments, revision, and finalization.The CONSORT 2010 Statement was extended by introducing the idea of TCM &lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;Pattern&lt;/span&gt; and the features of CHM formulas. One new checklist subitem, keywords, was added to facilitate indexing and data searching. Seven of the 25 CONSORT checklist items, namely title and abstract, background and objectives, participants, interventions, outcomes, generalizability, and interpretation, are now elaborated, and the explanation of harms specific to CHM formulas is revised. Illustrative examples and explanations are also provided. The group hopes that CONSORT-CHM Formulas 2017 can improve the reporting quality of RCTs of CHM formulas.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://annals.org/aim/article/2633843/consort-extension-chinese-herbal-medicine-formulas-2017-recommendations-explanation-elaboration</guid>
    </item>
    <item rdf="http://annals.org/aim/article/2633844/implantable-cardioverter-defibrillators-primary-prevention-patients-ischemic-nonischemic-cardiomyopathy-systematic">
      <title>Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators for Primary Prevention in Patients With Ischemic or Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis </title>
      <link>http://annals.org/aim/article/2633844/implantable-cardioverter-defibrillators-primary-prevention-patients-ischemic-nonischemic-cardiomyopathy-systematic</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Kołodziejczak M, Andreotti F, Kowalewski M, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Background:&lt;/div&gt;Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have a role in preventing cardiac arrest in patients at risk for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Purpose:&lt;/div&gt;To compare ICD therapy with conventional care for the primary prevention of death of various causes in adults with ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Data Sources:&lt;/div&gt;MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, and EMBASE databases, as well as several Web sites, from 1 April 1976 through 31 March 2017.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Study Selection:&lt;/div&gt;Randomized controlled trials, published in any language, comparing ICD therapy with conventional care and reporting mortality outcomes (all-cause, sudden, any cardiac, or noncardiac) in the primary prevention setting.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Data Extraction:&lt;/div&gt;2 independent investigators extracted study data and assessed risk of bias.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Data Synthesis:&lt;/div&gt;Included were 11 trials involving 8716 patients: 4 (1781 patients) addressed nonischemic cardiomyopathy, 6 (4414 patients) ischemic cardiomyopathy, and 1 (2521 patients) both types of cardiomyopathy. Mean follow-up was 3.2 years. An overall reduction in all-cause mortality, from 28.26% with conventional care to 21.37% with ICD therapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.81 [95% CI, 0.70 to 0.94]; &lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;P&lt;/span&gt; = 0.043), was found. The magnitude of reduction was similar in the cohorts with nonischemic (HR, 0.81 [CI, 0.72 to 0.91]) and ischemic (HR, 0.82 [CI, 0.63 to 1.06]) disease, although the latter estimate did not reach statistical significance. The rate of sudden death fell from 12.15% with conventional care to 4.39% with ICD therapy (HR, 0.41 [CI, 0.30 to 0.56]), with a similar magnitude of reduction in patients with ischemic (HR, 0.39 [CI, 0.23 to 0.68]) and those with nonischemic disease (HR, 0.44 [CI, 0.17 to 1.12]). Noncardiac and any cardiac deaths did not differ significantly by treatment.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Limitation:&lt;/div&gt;Heterogeneous timing of ICD placement; heterogeneous pharmacologic and resynchronization co-interventions; trials conducted in different eras; adverse events and complications not reviewed.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/div&gt;Overall, primary prevention with ICD therapy versus conventional care reduced the incidence of sudden and all-cause death.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Primary Funding Source:&lt;/div&gt;None.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://annals.org/aim/article/2633844/implantable-cardioverter-defibrillators-primary-prevention-patients-ischemic-nonischemic-cardiomyopathy-systematic</guid>
    </item>
    <item rdf="http://annals.org/aim/article/2633847/randomized-trials-chinese-herbal-medicine-new-extension-consort-statement">
      <title>Randomized Trials of Chinese Herbal Medicine: A New Extension of the CONSORT Statement</title>
      <link>http://annals.org/aim/article/2633847/randomized-trials-chinese-herbal-medicine-new-extension-consort-statement</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Linde K, Brinkhaus B. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;This issue includes an extension of the CONSORT Statement that presents and explains recommendations for the better description of randomized trials of Chinese herbal medicine. The editorialists discuss the extension and how it will help to improve the quality, trustworthiness, and clinical relevance of trials of Chinese herbal therapies.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://annals.org/aim/article/2633847/randomized-trials-chinese-herbal-medicine-new-extension-consort-statement</guid>
    </item>
    <item rdf="http://annals.org/aim/article/2633848/impact-whole-genome-sequencing-primary-care-outcomes-healthy-adult-patients">
      <title>The Impact of Whole-Genome Sequencing on the Primary Care and Outcomes of Healthy Adult Patients A Pilot Randomized Trial </title>
      <link>http://annals.org/aim/article/2633848/impact-whole-genome-sequencing-primary-care-outcomes-healthy-adult-patients</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Vassy JL, Christensen KD, Schonman EF, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Background:&lt;/div&gt;Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in asymptomatic adults might prevent disease but increase health care use without clinical value.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objective:&lt;/div&gt;To describe the effect on clinical care and outcomes of adding WGS to standardized family history assessment in primary care.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Design:&lt;/div&gt;Pilot randomized trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01736566)&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Setting:&lt;/div&gt;Academic primary care practices.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Participants:&lt;/div&gt;9 primary care physicians (PCPs) and 100 generally healthy patients recruited at ages 40 to 65 years.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Intervention:&lt;/div&gt;Patients were randomly assigned to receive a family history report alone (FH group) or in combination with an interpreted WGS report (FH + WGS group), which included monogenic disease risk (MDR) results (associated with Mendelian disorders), carrier variants, pharmacogenomic associations, and polygenic risk estimates for cardiometabolic traits. Each patient met with his or her PCP to discuss the report.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Measurements:&lt;/div&gt;Clinical outcomes and health care use through 6 months were obtained from medical records and audio-recorded discussions between PCPs and patients. Patients' health behavior changes were surveyed 6 months after receiving results. A panel of clinician-geneticists rated the appropriateness of how PCPs managed MDR results.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results:&lt;/div&gt;Mean age was 55 years; 58% of patients were female. Eleven FH + WGS patients (22% [95% CI, 12% to 36%]) had new MDR results. Only 2 (4% [CI, 0.01% to 15%]) had evidence of the phenotypes predicted by an MDR result (fundus albipunctatus due to &lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;RDH5&lt;/span&gt; and variegate porphyria due to &lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;PPOX&lt;/span&gt;). Primary care physicians recommended new clinical actions for 16% (CI, 8% to 30%) of FH patients and 34% (CI, 22% to 49%) of FH + WGS patients. Thirty percent (CI, 17% to 45%) and 41% (CI, 27% to 56%) of FH and FH + WGS patients, respectively, reported making a health behavior change after 6 months. Geneticists rated PCP management of 8 MDR results (73% [CI, 39% to 99%]) as appropriate and 2 results (18% [CI, 3% to 52%]) as inappropriate.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Limitation:&lt;/div&gt;Limited sample size and ancestral and socioeconomic diversity.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/div&gt;Adding WGS to primary care reveals new molecular findings of uncertain clinical utility. Nongeneticist providers may be able to manage WGS results appropriately, but WGS may prompt additional clinical actions of unclear value.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Primary Funding Source:&lt;/div&gt;National Institutes of Health.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://annals.org/aim/article/2633848/impact-whole-genome-sequencing-primary-care-outcomes-healthy-adult-patients</guid>
    </item>
    <item rdf="http://annals.org/aim/article/2633849/benefits-risks-antithrombotic-therapy-essential-thrombocythemia-systematic-review">
      <title>Benefits and Risks of Antithrombotic Therapy in Essential Thrombocythemia A Systematic Review </title>
      <link>http://annals.org/aim/article/2633849/benefits-risks-antithrombotic-therapy-essential-thrombocythemia-systematic-review</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Chu DK, Hillis CM, Leong DP, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Background:&lt;/div&gt;Patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) are at high risk for both thrombosis and hemorrhage.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Purpose:&lt;/div&gt;To evaluate the risks and benefits of antithrombotic therapy in adults with ET.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Data Sources:&lt;/div&gt;Multiple databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, through 4 March 2017.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Study Selection:&lt;/div&gt;Randomized and observational studies of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy, published in any language and reporting thrombotic or hemorrhagic events.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Data Extraction:&lt;/div&gt;Two reviewers independently extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and graded certainty of evidence.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Data Synthesis:&lt;/div&gt;No relevant randomized trials were identified. Twenty-four observational studies (18 comparative and 6 single-group) involving 6153 patients followed for 31 711 patient-years were reviewed; most were deemed to have high risk of bias. Most patients receiving antiplatelet therapy (3613 of 4527 [80%]) received low-dose aspirin (50 to 150 mg/d); 914 (20%) received high-dose aspirin (300 to 600 mg/d), dipyridamole, or other agents. Overall, findings were inconsistent and imprecise. The reported incidence rates of thrombosis, any bleeding, and major bleeding without antiplatelet therapy ranged from 5 to 110 (median, 20), from 3 to 39 (median, 8), and from 2 to 53 (median, 6) cases per 1000 patient-years, respectively. The reported relative risks for thrombosis, any bleeding, and major bleeding with antiplatelet therapy compared with none ranged from 0.26 to 3.48 (median, 0.74), from 0.48 to 11.04 (median, 1.95), and from 0.48 to 5.17 (median, 1.30), respectively. Certainty of evidence was rated low or very low for all outcomes.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Limitation:&lt;/div&gt;No randomized trials, no extractable data on anticoagulants, lack of uniform bleeding definitions, and systematic reporting of outcomes.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/div&gt;Available evidence about the risk–benefit ratio of antiplatelet therapy in adults with ET is highly uncertain.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Primary Funding Source:&lt;/div&gt;Regional Medical Associates. (PROSPERO: CRD42015027051)&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://annals.org/aim/article/2633849/benefits-risks-antithrombotic-therapy-essential-thrombocythemia-systematic-review</guid>
    </item>
    <item rdf="http://annals.org/aim/article/2633850/whole-genome-sequencing-primary-care">
      <title>Whole-Genome Sequencing in Primary Care</title>
      <link>http://annals.org/aim/article/2633850/whole-genome-sequencing-primary-care</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author />
      <description />
      <guid>http://annals.org/aim/article/2633850/whole-genome-sequencing-primary-care</guid>
    </item>
    <item rdf="http://annals.org/aim/article/2635008/erosive-rheumatoid-arthritis-after-bilateral-hand-transplantation">
      <title>Erosive Rheumatoid Arthritis After Bilateral Hand Transplantation</title>
      <link>http://annals.org/aim/article/2635008/erosive-rheumatoid-arthritis-after-bilateral-hand-transplantation</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Adler BL, Albayda J, Shores JT, et al. </author>
      <description />
      <guid>http://annals.org/aim/article/2635008/erosive-rheumatoid-arthritis-after-bilateral-hand-transplantation</guid>
    </item>
    <item rdf="http://annals.org/aim/article/2635009/antiplatelet-agents-beneficial-essential-thrombocythemia-maybe-yes-probably">
      <title>Are Antiplatelet Agents Beneficial in Essential Thrombocythemia? Maybe Yes, Probably No</title>
      <link>http://annals.org/aim/article/2635009/antiplatelet-agents-beneficial-essential-thrombocythemia-maybe-yes-probably</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Bennett JS. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;Chu and colleagues report a systematic review to determine the benefits and risks of treating patients with essential thrombocythemia with antiplatelet agents. The editorialist discusses the uncertainty the review uncovers and the need for high-quality trials to definitively address this important clinical question.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://annals.org/aim/article/2635009/antiplatelet-agents-beneficial-essential-thrombocythemia-maybe-yes-probably</guid>
    </item>
    <item rdf="http://annals.org/aim/article/2635061/consort-extension-chinese-herbal-medicine-formulas-2017-recommendations-explanation-elaboration">
      <title>CONSORT Extension for Chinese Herbal Medicine Formulas 2017: Recommendations, Explanation, and Elaboration (Traditional Chinese Version)</title>
      <link>http://annals.org/aim/article/2635061/consort-extension-chinese-herbal-medicine-formulas-2017-recommendations-explanation-elaboration</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Cheng C, Wu T, Shang H, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;This article is the traditional Chinese version of the CONSORT Extension for Chinese Herbal Medicine Formulas 2017: Recommendations, Explanation, and Elaboration.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://annals.org/aim/article/2635061/consort-extension-chinese-herbal-medicine-formulas-2017-recommendations-explanation-elaboration</guid>
    </item>
    <item rdf="http://annals.org/aim/article/2635062/consort-extension-chinese-herbal-medicine-formulas-2017-recommendations-explanation-elaboration">
      <title>CONSORT Extension for Chinese Herbal Medicine Formulas 2017: Recommendations, Explanation, and Elaboration (Simplified Chinese Version)</title>
      <link>http://annals.org/aim/article/2635062/consort-extension-chinese-herbal-medicine-formulas-2017-recommendations-explanation-elaboration</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Cheng C, Wu T, Shang H, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;This article is the simplified Chinese version of the CONSORT Extension for Chinese Herbal Medicine Formulas 2017: Recommendations, Explanation, and Elaboration.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://annals.org/aim/article/2635062/consort-extension-chinese-herbal-medicine-formulas-2017-recommendations-explanation-elaboration</guid>
    </item>
    <item rdf="http://annals.org/aim/article/2635325/incorporating-whole-genome-sequencing-primary-care-falling-barriers-next-steps">
      <title>Incorporating Whole-Genome Sequencing Into Primary Care: Falling Barriers and Next Steps</title>
      <link>http://annals.org/aim/article/2635325/incorporating-whole-genome-sequencing-primary-care-falling-barriers-next-steps</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Manolio TA. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;Vassy and colleagues report a pilot study of the effect of adding whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to a standardized family history assessment in primary care. The editorialist notes that the findings demonstrate that primary care physicians are capable of managing WGS findings, healthy patients tolerate this information well, and use and costs seem to increase. The unanswered question remains whether WGS will truly improve patient outcomes.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://annals.org/aim/article/2635325/incorporating-whole-genome-sequencing-primary-care-falling-barriers-next-steps</guid>
    </item>
    <item rdf="http://annals.org/aim/article/2635326/relationship-health-insurance-mortality-lack-insurance-deadly">
      <title>The Relationship of Health Insurance and Mortality: Is Lack of Insurance Deadly?</title>
      <link>http://annals.org/aim/article/2635326/relationship-health-insurance-mortality-lack-insurance-deadly</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;About 28 million Americans are currently uninsured, and millions more could lose coverage under policy reforms proposed in Congress. At the same time, a growing number of policy leaders have called for going beyond the Affordable Care Act to a single-payer national health insurance system that would cover every American. These policy debates lend particular salience to studies evaluating the health effects of insurance coverage. In 2002, an Institute of Medicine review concluded that lack of insurance increases mortality, but several relevant studies have appeared since that time. This article summarizes current evidence concerning the relationship of insurance and mortality. The evidence strengthens confidence in the Institute of Medicine's conclusion that health insurance saves lives: The odds of dying among the insured relative to the uninsured is 0.71 to 0.97.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://annals.org/aim/article/2635326/relationship-health-insurance-mortality-lack-insurance-deadly</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>