ANTONY R. UNWIN, M.D.
This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access.
To the editor: I was asked as a statistician to look at the paper by Rotter and colleagues (1) in your September 1979 issue. The medical side of the article was interesting, but I have had some doubts about the handling of data and presentation of results.
In Table 1 (p. 374) the definite hyperpepsinogenemic group includes 93 affected patients (that is, those with a duodenal ulcer or an elevated pepsinogen level, or both). In Table 2 (p. 375) subset 2 "is equivalent to the entire definite hyperpepsinogenemic group" but only includes 83 affected patients. What is the reason for
UNWIN AR. Statistical Assessment of Hyperpepsinogenemia Data. Ann Intern Med. 1980;93:377–378. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-93-2-377_2
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 1980;93(2):377-378.
Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Peptic Disease, Peptic Ulcer.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2020 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use