This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access.
I admit that I began this book from a biased point of view and, further, that I have secretly gloated when studies have failed to show any better "learning" from programmed instruction than from the conventional methods.
I resented the repetitiousness of the text, the typographical errors, and the idiot-type clues for some of the "fill-ins" (f -, ad -, a -, v -, intended to "lead" me to flat, admixture, atrial, and ventricular).
The reproductions are superb, however, and I did enjoy "diagnosing" them and then comparing myself against the text, and I am glad I felt forced to
Cardiovascular Roentgenology: A Validated Program.. Ann Intern Med. 1967;67:474. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-67-2-474_1
Download citation file:
© 2019
Published: Ann Intern Med. 1967;67(2):474.
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-67-2-474_1