This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access.
In his preface, Editor Galdston assures his reader he will be grateful "for the absence of the old chestnuts celebrating the heroics of such as Weyer, Pinel, Rush, Tuke, and Dorothy Dix. . . ." He should have added the names of Freud, Adler, and Jung, since the reader is spared all but passing mention of their heroics as well. So, caveat emptor! Can a book do justice to the title Historic Derivations of Modern Psychiatry with only a nod to such giants? Isn't there a limit of how far the historian may go in avoiding the admittedly tedious and
Historic Derivations of Modern Psychiatry.. Ann Intern Med. 1968;69:174–175. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-69-1-174
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 1968;69(1):174-175.
Copyright © 2020 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use