HENRY MATTHEW, M.D., F.R.C.P.
This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access.
To the editor: I write regarding the paper by Fisher, Humphries, and Bails, which appeared in the November 1971 issue, pp. 731-736. The article has the effrontery to be headed, "Recovery from Renal and Pulmonary Damage"—after ingestion of paraquat (Dual®).
The evidence that their patient had pulmonary damage from paraquat is totally lacking; however the authors state, "We believe this to be the first report of survival after paraquat-induced lung damage in man." The sole abnormality on which lung damage is based is a low diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide, yet in the very sentence before their monstrous claim of
MATTHEW H. Paraquat and the Lung. Ann Intern Med. ;76:835. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-76-5-835_1
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 1972;76(5):835.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use