ROBERT H. BROOK, M.D., Sc.D.; ARLENE FINK, Ph.D.; JACQUELINE KOSECOFF, Ph.D.; LAWRENCE S. LINN, Ph.D.; WENDY EVERETT WATSON, Sc.D.; ALLYSON ROSS DAVIES, Ph.D.; VIRGINIA A. CLARK, Ph.D.; CAREN KAMBERG, M.S.P.H.; THOMAS L. DELBANCO, M.D.
We evaluated 15 group practices in general internal medicine in university hospitals with regard to access to and quality of care, patients' satisfaction with that care, and quality of residency education provided. We used these data to speculate about potential changes in ambulatory care programs in university teaching hospitals. All 15 practices participated for 4 years. One third of their patient population had no medical insurance. Practice patients had twice as many chronic illnesses as did the general population, and two fifths of patients stayed at least 2 years in the practice. Few faculty members spent more than 14 hours weekly in the practices, and housestaff worked an average of 4 hours per week. Patient waiting times did not meet ideal standards, but patient satisfaction was higher than in a general population. Compliance with quality of care criteria was not exceptional; for example, 10% of eligible patients received an annual influenza vaccination. Housestaff assigned a relatively low ranking to their educational experience in the practices. We recommend the institution of additional experimental programs in ambulatory care and housestaff education to improve the quality of care in the ambulatory setting.
BROOK RH, FINK A, KOSECOFF J, et al. Educating Physicians and Treating Patients in the Ambulatory Setting: Where Are We Going and How Will We Know When We Arrive?. Ann Intern Med. 1987;107:392–398. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-107-2-392
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 1987;107(3):392-398.
Healthcare Delivery and Policy, Hospital Medicine, Infectious Disease, Influenza, Prevention/Screening.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2019 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use