Skip Navigation
Menu
Letters |1 November 1994

Ethics Committees

Janet Fleetwood, PhD; Stephanie S. Unger, JD

FULL TEXT
IN RESPONSE:
Miller and Mackler's letter illuminates the intent of the New York State Task Force on Life and the Law regarding the authority of institutional ethics committees. Although we are encouraged that the Task Force did not mean to propose giving physicians “special or automatic immunity for following the advice of an ethics committee,” we remain concerned about the clarity of their 1992 document [1].
Appendix A of section 11, Bioethics review committees, part C, page 262, states: “Recommendations and advice by the bioethics review committee shall be advisory and nonbinding, except for committee approvals or disapprovals of the withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining treatment from an emancipated minor patient, from an adult patient without a surrogate, or from any patient who is neither terminally ill nor permanently unconscious.” We believe it fair to interpret this statement to mean that advice from a committee is binding when it involves foregoing treatment for the aforementioned patient categories. Our interpretation was echoed in an article in Hospital Ethics[2] that stated: “In cases involving life-sustaining treatment decisions, the proposed legislation would make the forgoing of such treatment subject to the review and approval of multidisciplinary institutional ethics committees”
FULL TEXT
PDF
Not Available
Citations
Citation

Fleetwood J, Unger SS. Ethics Committees. Ann Intern Med. 1994;121:725. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-121-9-199411010-00037

Download citation file:

© 2019

×
Permissions

Published: Ann Intern Med. 1994;121(9):725.

DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-121-9-199411010-00037

1 Citations
CONTINUE WITH LIMITED ACCESS
Annals of Internal Medicine
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
acp link acp
silverchair link silverchair

Copyright © 2019 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704

Privacy Policy

|

Conditions of Use

This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. | Accept
×

You need a subscription to this content to use this feature.

×
PDF Downloads Require Access to the Full Article.
Annals of Internal Medicine
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
Access to this Free Content Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In. Please Choose One of the Following Options
Annals of Internal Medicine
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×