Skip Navigation
Menu
Editorials |4 July 2000

Ethics Consultation: High Ideals or Unrealistic Expectations?

Jeffrey Spike, PhD; Jane Greenlaw, JD

Article, Author, and Disclosure Information
Author, Article, and Disclosure Information
  • From University of Rochester Medical Center; Rochester, NY 14642

    Requests To Purchase Bulk Reprints (minimum, 100 copies): the Reprints Coordinator; phone, 215-351-2657; e-mail, reprints@mail.acponline.org.

    Current Author Addresses: Dr. Spike and Ms. Greenlaw: University of Rochester Medical Center, Division of the Medical Humanities and Program in Clinical Ethics, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 676, Rochester, NY 14642.

×
FULL TEXT
Ethics consultation evolved out of the field of bioethics, which was itself largely a product of the 1970s. Thus, when the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities report “Core Competencies for Health Care Ethics Consultation” was commissioned 4 years ago (1), the oldest ethics services had been in existence for barely 20 years and were in the adolescent stage of development—with high ideals and unrealistic expectations. The report represented the opportunity to evaluate the progress of and set future agendas for ethics consultation.
The report makes an informative starting point for someone interested in learning about ethics consultation. However, because it is the work of a consensus panel, the report softens or avoids some points of disagreement. This commentary tackles four such points and highlights the critical weaknesses of some of the approaches that the consensus panel presents as viable options. The four issues that we find problematic concern committees versus individual consultants, interdisciplinary competency, practical wisdom versus character, and financial support for ethics services.
The committee approach to ethics consultation may be effective in long-term care settings. However, it becomes unwieldy in acute care settings because it is difficult to convene a quorum of a 12- to 15-member committee in less than 72 hours. A second problem with committees performing consultations concerns the common practice of appointing members because of their job descriptions rather than because of their interest or experience in ethics. A third problem is the danger of “groupthink.” One member, such as the most politically...
FULL TEXT
PDF
Not Available
Citations
Citation

Spike J, Greenlaw J. Ethics Consultation: High Ideals or Unrealistic Expectations?. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:55–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-133-1-200007040-00010

Download citation file:

© 2019

×
Permissions

Published: Ann Intern Med. 2000;133(1):55-57.

DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-1-200007040-00010

©
2000 American College of Physicians
14 Citations

Related Articles
Health Care Ethics Consultation: Nature, Goals, and Competencies: A Position Paper from the Society for Health and Human Values–Society for Bioethics Consultation Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation
Annals of Internal Medicine; 133 (1): 59-69
Seeding Trials: Just Say “No”
Annals of Internal Medicine; 149 (4): 279-280
Ethics Consultation
Annals of Internal Medicine; 114 (9): 807-808
Ethics Consultation: Skills, Roles, and Training
Annals of Internal Medicine; 114 (2): 155-160
View MoreView Less

Related Topics
Ethics

Ethics.

PubMed Articles
Clinicians' Self-Reported Practices Related to End-of-Life Care for Infants in NICUs in Jordan.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2019.
Amalgam phase down: baseline data preceding implementation in Nigeria.
Int Dent J 2019.
View More

Results provided by: PubMed

CONTINUE WITH LIMITED ACCESS
Annals of Internal Medicine
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
acp link acp
silverchair link silverchair

Copyright © 2019 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704

Privacy Policy

|

Conditions of Use

This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. | Accept
×

You need a subscription to this content to use this feature.

×
PDF Downloads Require Access to the Full Article.
Annals of Internal Medicine
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
Access to this Free Content Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In. Please Choose One of the Following Options
Annals of Internal Medicine
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×