Marcia Valenstein, MD, MS; Sandeep Vijan, MD, MS; John E. Zeber, MHA; Kathryn Boehm, MD, MS; Amna Buttar, MD, MS
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Drs. Hayward, Katz, Klinkman, Mellow, and Nease for review and comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript.
Grant Support: By Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Career Development Award RC-98350-1; the Department of Veterans Affairs Center for Practice Outcomes and Management; and the Serious Mental Illness Treatment and Evaluation Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Requests for Single Reprints: Marcia Valenstein, MD, MS, Health Services Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Box 130170, Ann Arbor, MI 48113-0170.
Current Author Addresses: Drs. Valenstein and Vijan and Mr. Zeber: Health Services Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Box 130170, Ann Arbor, MI 48113-0170.
Dr. Boehm: Medical College of Ohio, Adolescent and Young Adult Health Services, 2222 Cherry Street, Suite 2600, Toledo, OH 43608.
Dr. Buttar: Department of Medicine, Division of General Medicine and Geriatrics, Indiana University, Wishard Health Sciences, OPW-M200, 1001 West Tenth Street, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202.
Author Contributions: Conception and design: M. Valenstein, S. Vijan, J.E. Zeber, K. Boehm, A. Buttar.
Analysis and interpretation of the data: M. Valenstein, S. Vijan, J.E. Zeber, K. Boehm, A. Buttar.
Drafting of the article: M. Valenstein.
Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: M. Valenstein, S. Vijan, J.E. Zeber, K. Boehm.
Final approval of the article: M. Valenstein, S. Vijan, J.E. Zeber, K. Boehm.
Provision of study materials or patients: K. Boehm.
Statistical expertise: S. Vijan, J.E. Zeber.
Administrative, technical, or logistic support: J.E. Zeber.
Collection and assembly of data: K. Boehm, A. Buttar.
Depressive disorders are common in primary care and cause substantial disability, but they often remain undiagnosed. Screening is a frequently proposed strategy for increasing detection of depression.
To examine the cost–utility of screening for depression compared with no screening.
Nonstationary Markov model.
The published literature.
Hypothetical cohort of 40-year-old primary care patients.
Health care payer and societal.
Self-administered questionnaire followed by provider assessment.
Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).
Compared with no screening, the cost to society of annual screening for depression in primary care patients is $192 444/QALY. Screening every 5 years and one-time screening cost $50 988/QALY and $32 053/QALY, respectively, compared with no screening. From the payer perspective, the cost of annual screening is $225 467.
Cost–utility ratios are most sensitive to the prevalence of major depression, the costs of screening, rates of treatment initiation, and remission rates with treatment. In Monte Carlo sensitivity analyses, the cost–utility of annual screening is less than $50 000/QALY only 2.2% of the time. In multiway analyses, four model variables must be changed to extreme values for the cost–utility of annual screening to fall below $50 000/QALY, but a change in only one variable increases the cost–utility of one-time screening to more than $50 000/QALY. One-time screening is more robustly cost-effective if screening costs are low and effective treatments are being given.
Annual and periodic screening for depression cost more than $50 000/QALY, but one-time screening is cost-effective. The cost-effectiveness of screening is likely to improve if treatment becomes more effective.
Valenstein M, Vijan S, Zeber JE, et al. The Cost–Utility of Screening for Depression in Primary Care. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:345–360. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-134-5-200103060-00007
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(5):345-360.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2019 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use