Maxine A. Papadakis, MD; Gerald K. Arnold, PhD; Linda L. Blank; Eric S. Holmboe, MD; Rebecca S. Lipner, PhD
Note: Dr. Lipner from the ABIM had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Grant Support: From the ABIM Foundation.
Acknowledgment: The authors thank F. Daniel Duffy, MD; Michael G. Shlipak, MD; and Robert M. Wachter, MD, for their contributions to the analysis and interpretation of the findings.
Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: Employment: G.K. Arnold, E.S. Holmboe, R.S. Lipner (American Board of Internal Medicine). Honoraria: M.A. Papadakis (American Board of Internal Medicine).
Requests for Single Reprints: Maxine A. Papadakis, MD, University of California at San Francisco, 533 Parnassus Avenue, S-245, San Francisco, CA 94143; e-mail, email@example.com.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Papadakis: University of California at San Francisco, 533 Parnassus Avenue, S-245, San Francisco, CA 94143.
Drs. Arnold, Holmboe, and Lipner: American Board of Internal Medicine, 510 Walnut Street, Suite 1700, Philadelphia, PA 19106.
Ms. Blank: c/o Maxine A. Papadakis, MD, University of California at San Francisco, 533 Parnassus Avenue, S-245, San Francisco, CA 94143.
Physicians who are disciplined by state licensing boards are more likely to have demonstrated unprofessional behavior in medical school. Information is limited on whether similar performance measures taken during residency can predict performance as practicing physicians.
To determine whether performance measures during residency predict the likelihood of future disciplinary actions against practicing internists.
Retrospective cohort study.
State licensing board disciplinary actions against physicians from 1990 to 2006.
66 171 physicians who entered internal medicine residency training in the United States from 1990 to 2000 and became diplomates.
Predictor variables included components of the Residents' Annual Evaluation Summary ratings and American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) certification examination scores.
2 performance measures independently predicted disciplinary action. A low professionalism rating on the Residents' Annual Evaluation Summary predicted increased risk for disciplinary action (hazard ratio, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.3 to 2.2]), and high performance on the ABIM certification examination predicted decreased risk for disciplinary action (hazard ratio, 0.7 [CI, 0.60 to 0.70] for American or Canadian medical school graduates and 0.9 [CI, 0.80 to 1.0] for international medical school graduates). Progressively better professionalism ratings and ABIM certification examination scores were associated with less risk for subsequent disciplinary actions; the risk ranged from 4.0% for the lowest professionalism rating to 0.5% for the highest and from 2.5% for the lowest examination scores to 0.0% for the highest.
The study was retrospective. Some diplomates may have practiced outside of the United States. Nondiplomates were excluded.
Poor performance on behavioral and cognitive measures during residency are associated with greater risk for state licensing board actions against practicing physicians at every point on a performance continuum. These findings support the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education standards for professionalism and cognitive performance and the development of best practices to remediate these deficiencies.
Papadakis MA, Arnold GK, Blank LL, et al. Performance during Internal Medicine Residency Training and Subsequent Disciplinary Action by State Licensing Boards. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:869–876. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-11-200806030-00009
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(11):869-876.
Education and Training.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2019 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use