Skip Navigation
Menu
ACP Journal Club |16 December 2008

GRADE: assessing the quality of evidence for diagnostic recommendations

Holger J. Schünemann, MD, PhD; Andrew D. Oxman, MD, MSc; Jan Brozek, MD, PhD; Paul Glasziou, MD, PhD; Patrick Bossuyt, PhD; Stephanie Chang, MD, MPH; Paola Muti, MD, MSc; Roman Jaeschke, MD, MSc; Gordon H. Guyatt, MD, MSc

Article, Author, and Disclosure Information
FULL TEXT
Making a diagnosis is the bread and butter of clinical practice, but in light of the number of tests now available to clinician, diagnosing illness has become a complicated process. Guidelines for making an evidence-based diagnosis abound, but those making recommendations about diagnostic tests or test strategies must realize that clinicians require support to make diagnostic decisions that they can easily implement in daily practice. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group has developed a rigorous, transparent, and increasingly adopted approach for grading the quality of research evidence and strength of recommendations to guide clinical practice....
FULL TEXT
PDF
Not Available
Citations
Citation

Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, Glasziou P, Bossuyt P, Chang S, et al. GRADE: assessing the quality of evidence for diagnostic recommendations. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:JC6–2. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-12-200812160-02002

Download citation file:

© 2019

×
Permissions

Published: Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(12):JC6-2.

DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-12-200812160-02002

25 Citations

Related Articles
Annals Graphic Medicine - Judgment Call
Annals of Internal Medicine; 165 (5): W6-W11
Let's Not SPRINT to Judgment About New Blood Pressure Goals
Annals of Internal Medicine; 164 (10): 692-693
Review: Nutritional supplementation has uncertain effects on patient-important outcomes in COPD
Annals of Internal Medicine; 158 (10): JC5
Screening for Liver Cancer: The Rush to Judgment
Annals of Internal Medicine; 156 (5): 387-389
View MoreView Less

Journal Club
Review: Nutritional supplementation has uncertain effects on patient-important outcomes in COPD
Annals of Internal Medicine; 158 (10): JC5
What kind of randomized trials do patients and clinicians need?
Annals of Internal Medicine; 150 (10): JC5-2
Screening with spiral CT did not reduce lung cancer mortality in older male smokers
Annals of Internal Medicine; 151 (12): JC6-11
View MoreView Less

Related Topics
Nephrology
Prevention/Screening
Urological Disorders

Nephrology, Prevention/Screening, Urological Disorders.

PubMed Articles
Prediction-based neural mechanisms for shielding the self from existential threat.
Neuroimage 2019.
Personalizing prostate cancer diagnosis with multivariate risk prediction tools: how should prostate MRI be incorporated?
World J Urol 2019.
View More

Results provided by: PubMed

CONTINUE WITH LIMITED ACCESS
Annals of Internal Medicine
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
acp link acp
silverchair link silverchair

Copyright © 2019 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704

Privacy Policy

|

Conditions of Use

This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. | Accept
×

You need a subscription to this content to use this feature.

×
PDF Downloads Require Access to the Full Article.
Annals of Internal Medicine
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
Access to this Free Content Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In. Please Choose One of the Following Options
Annals of Internal Medicine
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×