Skip Navigation
American College of Physicians Logo
  • Subscribe
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Sign In
    Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
    INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
    Sign In|Set Up Account
    You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
    INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN
    Open Athens|Shibboleth|Log In
    Annals of Internal Medicine
    SUBSCRIBE
    Subscribe to Annals of Internal Medicine.
    You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your purchase.
Annals of Internal Medicine Logo Menu
  • Latest
  • Issues
  • Channels
  • CME/MOC
  • In the Clinic
  • Journal Club
  • Web Exclusives
  • Author Info
Advanced Search
  • ‹ PREV ARTICLE
  • This Issue
  • NEXT ARTICLE ›
Summaries for Patients |21 February 2012

Does Routinely Assessing Family History Improve Detection of Patients at High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease? Free

  • ‹ PREV ARTICLE
  • This Issue
  • NEXT ARTICLE ›
Jump To
  • Full Article
  • FULL ARTICLE
  • FULL ARTICLE
    • What is the problem and what is known about it so far?
    • Why did the researchers do this particular study?
    • Who was studied?
    • How was the study done?
    • What did the researchers find?
    • What were the limitations of the study?
    • What are the implications of the study?
  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplements
  • Audio/Video
  • Summary for Patients
  • Clinical Slide Sets
  • CME / MOC
  • Comments
  • Twitter Link
  • Facebook Link
  • Email Link
More
  • LinkedIn Link

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

Because family history is a recognized risk factor for many chronic diseases, including cancer, diabetes, and coronary heart disease (CHD), doctors often ask patients about diseases and other health problems that have occurred in their family as part of routine care. By combining family history with other clinical information, doctors can better assess a patient's risk for such diseases. However, evidence is limited on the value of routinely assessing family history in primary care, as well as on the effect of collecting such infor-mation on patients. Self-administered questionnaires on family history are one approach to collecting these data more systematically and, possibly, improving identification of significant familial risk.

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

To evaluate the effect of collecting family history of CHD when assessing cardiovascular risk in primary care.

Who was studied?

748 patients aged 30 to 65 years from 24 family practices in England. The patients had no previously diagnosed cardiovascular risk.

How was the study done?

The practices were organized into 12 pairs of 1 control and 1 intervention practice each. In all practices, medical staff calculated a standard patient risk score for cardiovascular disease by inputting core risk factors (age, sex, smoking status, systolic blood pressure, and the ratio of total to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels) into a risk calculator. Doctors usually use this score to estimate a patient's 10-year risk for cardiovascular disease.
In the intervention practices, clinicians also had patients complete a questionnaire to collect information on family history of CHD. The clinicians multiplied a patient's risk score by 1.5 if a family history of premature CHD was identified, because a patient is more likely to develop CHD if he or she has a male sibling or parent younger than 55 years who had CHD or a female sibling or parent younger than 65 years who had CHD.
Doctors invited patients identified as having high cardiovascular risk (≥20% risk in the next 10 years) for a consultation, at which the increased risk was explained and advice was offered on lifestyle changes to reduce risk, such as dietary changes, smoking cessation, and exercise.

What did the researchers find?

When systematic collection of family history was added to usual cardiovascular risk assessment, 5% more persons were identified as having high risk for CHD. High patient response and completion rates suggest that collecting the necessary family history data by using a self-completed questionnaire is possible. The family history intervention did not lead to undue anxiety among the patients.

What were the limitations of the study?

Relatively few participants were from minority or less-educated groups, so the results may not apply to all populations. The study did not explore how being identified as having high risk affected behavioral change and clinical outcomes.

What are the implications of the study?

Routinely collecting family history can improve the identification of patients with high risk for heart disease and may increase the likelihood that they receive preventive care.

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

This feature is available only to Registered Users

Subscribe/Learn More
Submit a Comment

0 Comments

PDF
Not Available
Citations
Citation

Does Routinely Assessing Family History Improve Detection of Patients at High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease?. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:I–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-156-4-201202210-00001

Download citation file:

  • Ris (Zotero)
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • Medlars
  • ProCite
  • RefWorks
  • Reference Manager

© 2019

×
Permissions

Published: Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(4):I-38.

DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-4-201202210-00001

0 Citations

See Also

Effect of Adding Systematic Family History Enquiry to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment in Primary Care : A Matched-Pair, Cluster Randomized Trial
View MoreView Less

Related Articles

Statins and Multiple Noncardiovascular Outcomes: Umbrella Review of Meta-analyses of Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials
Annals of Internal Medicine; 169 (8): 543-553
Review: Folic acid may reduce risk for CVD and stroke, and B-vitamin complex may reduce risk for stroke
Annals of Internal Medicine; 169 (8): JC44
Clonal Hematopoiesis Confers Predisposition to Both Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer: A Newly Recognized Link Between Two Major Killers
Annals of Internal Medicine; 169 (2): 116-117
Clinical Implications of Revised Pooled Cohort Equations for Estimating Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk
Annals of Internal Medicine; 169 (1): 20-29
View MoreView Less

Journal Club

Review: Folic acid may reduce risk for CVD and stroke, and B-vitamin complex may reduce risk for stroke
Annals of Internal Medicine; 169 (8): JC44
In type 2 diabetes with CVD and kidney disease, empagliflozin reduced mortality and hospitalization
Annals of Internal Medicine; 168 (10): JC52
In stable CVD, rivaroxaban plus aspirin reduced CV events and increased bleeding compared with aspirin alone
Annals of Internal Medicine; 167 (10): JC52
Evolocumab reduced CV events in patients with atherosclerotic CV disease taking high- or moderate-intensity statins
Annals of Internal Medicine; 167 (2): JC7
View MoreView Less

Related Topics

Cardiology
Prevention/Screening

Cardiology, Prevention/Screening.

PubMed Articles

Screening active ingredients of rosemary based on spectrum-effect relationships between UPLC fingerprint and vasorelaxant activity using three chemometrics.
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2019;
Examining the impact of data quality and completeness of electronic health records on predictions of patients' risks of cardiovascular disease.
Int J Med Inform 2019;
View More

Results provided by: PubMed

CME/MOC Activity Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
The Comments Feature Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
link to top

Content

  • Home
  • Latest
  • Issues
  • Channels
  • CME/MOC
  • In the Clinic
  • Journal Club
  • Web Exclusives

Information For

  • Author Info
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Readers
  • Institutions / Libraries / Agencies
  • Advertisers

Services

  • Subscribe
  • Renew
  • Alerts
  • Current Issue RSS
  • Latest RSS
  • In the Clinic RSS
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • Help
  • About Annals
  • About Mobile
  • Patient Information
  • Teaching Tools
  • Annals in the News
  • Share Your Feedback

Awards and Cover

  • Personae (Cover Photo)
  • Junior Investigator Awards
  • Poetry Prize

Other Resources

  • ACP Online
  • Career Connection
  • ACP Advocate Blog
  • ACP Journal Wise

Follow Annals On

  • Twitter Link
  • Facebook Link
acp link acp
silverchair link silverchair

Copyright © 2019 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704

Privacy Policy

|

Conditions of Use

This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. | Accept
×

You need a subscription to this content to use this feature.

×
PDF Downloads Require Access to the Full Article.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN
Open Athens|Shibboleth|Log In
Annals of Internal Medicine
PURCHASE OPTIONS
Buy This Article|Subscribe
You will be redirected to acponline.org to sign-in to Annals to complete your purchase.
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
Access to this Free Content Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In. Please Choose One of the Following Options
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×