Restrictions for Medicaid Reimbursement of Sofosbuvir for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the United States

Soumitri Barua; Robert Greenwald; Jason Grebely; Gregory J. Dore; Tracy Swan; Lynn E. Taylor

doi:10.7326/M15-0406

Medicine and Public Issues |4 August 2015

Restrictions for Medicaid Reimbursement of Sofosbuvir for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the United States Free

Soumitri Barua; Robert Greenwald, JD; Jason Grebely, PhD; Gregory J. Dore, MBBS, PhD; Tracy Swan; Lynn E. Taylor, MD

Article, Author, and Disclosure Information

This article was published online first at www.annals.org on 30 June 2015.

From Brown University and The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island; Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts; University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; and Treatment Action Group, New York, New York.
Note: Dr. Taylor and Mr. Greenwald had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Dr. Taylor affirms that she has listed everyone who contributed significantly to the work. There was no involvement of any pharmaceutical company or commercial entity in the preparation of this work.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the position of the Australian government. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases or the National Institutes of Health.
Acknowledgment: The authors thank Evan Cunningham (The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) for his assistance with preparing the figures for this manuscript; Amy Rosenberg (Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts) for her suggested edits; and Kellen Wittkop and Sam Hammond (Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Massachusetts) for assistance with data collection.
Financial Support: The Kirby Institute is funded by the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Dr. Grebely is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Career Development Fellowship. Mr. Greenwald is supported by Harvard Law School. Dr. Taylor is supported by a Rhode Island Innovation Fellowship from the Rhode Island Foundation for her “Rhode Island Defeats Hep C” project and the Lifespan/Tufts/Brown Center for AIDS Research (grant P30AI042853 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases). Ms. Barua was supported by the Lifespan/Tufts/Brown Center for AIDS Research Summer Student Internship program (grant P30AI042853).
Disclosures: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M15-0406.
Editors' Disclosures: Christine Laine, MD, MPH, Editor in Chief, reports that she has no financial relationships or interests to disclose. Darren B. Taichman, MD, PhD, Executive Deputy Editor, reports that he has no financial relationships or interests to disclose. Cynthia D. Mulrow, MD, MSc, Senior Deputy Editor, reports that she has no relationships or interests to disclose. Deborah Cotton, MD, MPH, Deputy Editor, reports that she has no financial relationships or interest to disclose. Jaya K. Rao, MD, MHS, Deputy Editor, reports that she has stock holdings/options in Eli Lilly and Pfizer. Sankey V. Williams, MD, Deputy Editor, reports that he has no financial relationships or interests to disclose. Catharine B. Stack, PhD, MS, Deputy Editor for Statistics, reports that she has stock holdings in Pfizer.
Requests for Single Reprints: Lynn E. Taylor, MD, Department of Medicine, Division of Infection Diseases, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, The Miriam Hospital, 164 Summit Avenue, Center for AIDS Research Building, Room 156, Providence, RI; e-mail, LTaylor@Lifespan.org.
Current Author Addresses: Ms. Barua: Brown University, 69 Brown Street, Box 2222, Providence, RI 02912.
Mr. Greenwald: Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation, Harvard Law School, 122 Boylston Street, Jamaica Plain, MA 02130.
Drs. Grebely and Dore: The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Wallace Wurth Building, Sydney New South Wales 2052, Australia.
Ms. Swan: Treatment Action Group, 611 Broadway, Suite 308, New York, NY 10012.
Dr. Taylor: Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, The Miriam Hospital, 164 Summit Avenue, Center for AIDS Research Building, Room 156, Providence, RI 02906.
Author Contributions: Conception and design: J. Grebely, L.E. Taylor.
Analysis and interpretation of the data: S. Barua, R. Greenwald, J. Grebely, G.J. Dore, T. Swan, L.E. Taylor.
Drafting of the article: S. Barua, R. Greenwald, J. Grebely, T. Swan, L.E. Taylor.
Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: J. Grebely, G.J. Dore, Swan T, L.E. Taylor.
Final approval of the article: S. Barua, R. Greenwald, J. Grebely, G.J. Dore, T. Swan, L.E. Taylor.
Statistical expertise: S. Barua, J. Grebely.
Obtaining of funding: S. Barua, L.E. Taylor.
Administrative, technical, or logistic support: S. Barua, J. Grebely, L.E. Taylor.
Collection and assembly of data: S. Barua, R. Greenwald, J. Grebely, L.E. Taylor.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate state Medicaid policies for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with sofosbuvir in the United States. Medicaid reimbursement criteria for sofosbuvir were evaluated in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The authors searched state Medicaid Web sites between 23 June and 7 December 2014 and extracted data in duplicate. Any differences were resolved by consensus. Data were extracted on whether sofosbuvir was covered and the criteria for coverage based on the following categories: liver disease stage, HIV co-infection, prescriber type, and drug or alcohol use. Of the 42 states with known Medicaid reimbursement criteria for sofosbuvir, 74% limit sofosbuvir access to persons with advanced fibrosis (Meta-Analysis of Histologic Data in Viral Hepatitis [METAVIR] fibrosis stage F3) or cirrhosis (F4). One quarter of states require persons co-infected with HCV and HIV to be receiving antiretroviral therapy or to have suppressed HIV RNA levels. Two thirds of states have restrictions based on prescriber type, and 88% include drug or alcohol use in their sofosbuvir eligibility criteria, with 50% requiring a period of abstinence and 64% requiring urine drug screening. Heterogeneity is present in Medicaid reimbursement criteria for sofosbuvir with respect to liver disease staging, HIV co-infection, prescriber type, and drug or alcohol use across the United States. Restrictions do not seem to conform with recommendations from professional organizations, such as the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Current restrictions seem to violate federal Medicaid law, which requires states to cover drugs consistent with their U.S. Food and Drug Administration labels.

Highly effective (cure rate >90%), once-daily, oral interferon-free treatments with minimal adverse effects are now available for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Worldwide, an estimated 80 to 150 million persons have chronic HCV (1, 2). If left untreated, chronic HCV can lead to cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (3, 4). Rates of advanced liver disease complications, associated health care costs, and liver disease–related mortality are rising worldwide (3, 4). Regimens for treating HCV seem to be curative and reduce liver-related and all-cause mortality (5). Uptake of HCV treatment has been low in many settings (6–8) in part because of the poor tolerability of interferon-based regimens. Widespread access to interferon-free regimens has the potential to greatly affect HCV morbidity and mortality.

Sofosbuvir, a pan-genotypic nucleotide analogue NS5B polymerase inhibitor indicated for treatment of chronic HCV in combination with other direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on 6 December 2013. Sofosbuvir is the first DAA indicated for use as part of an interferon-free regimen. Compared with interferon-based therapy, sofosbuvir-based interferon-free regimens show response rates greater than 90%, shortened treatment duration (8 to 12 weeks), and improved tolerability and safety (although with some combinations, lower responses are seen in persons with more advanced disease and certain HCV genotypes) (9–14).

The wholesale acquisition cost of sofosbuvir is $1000 per day (equating to $84 000 for a 12-week course) and must be used with 1 or more medications at additional cost. A fixed-dose, single-tablet combination of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir (an NS5A inhibitor) is now available at a wholesale acquisition cost of $1125 per day ($63 000, $94 500, and $189 000 for an 8-, 12-, and 24-week course, respectively). The high price of these regimens and high demand (actual or anticipated) for them has led payers to restrict access, although by law Medicaid programs are entitled to a rebate of at least 23% (15, 16). Some payers have negotiated ample rebates; however, they have not altered their reimbursement restrictions.

Further complicating matters is that different federal standards apply depending on whether a beneficiary is eligible under “traditional” Medicaid or is “newly eligible” for Medicaid in 1 of the 28 states that have implemented the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion provision (16). Within the 51 fee-for-service Medicaid programs, there are also different programs and requirements for different populations and different models of care financing and delivery (for example, fee-for-service and managed care organizations). For the purposes of this article, we have focused on state fee-for-service programs and not managed care. Because our focus here is on clinical factors, detailed legal analysis of the many complex Medicaid program rules is beyond the scope of this article.

In the United States, a disproportionate number of persons living with HCV have low income (17). For purposes of this article, “low income” means having income at or below the highest state Medicaid eligibility limit for parents of dependent children. Currently, the state with the highest Medicaid income eligibility limit is Connecticut at 201% of the federal poverty level. Further, the 2015 federal poverty level for a single person in all states except Alaska and Hawaii is $11 770; 201% equals $23 658 (18). Most persons are eligible for reimbursement of HCV therapy through Medicaid, which is the jointly funded federal and state partnership that provides health insurance for low-income persons meeting the program's eligibility criteria. Each state has wide discretion in administering its own Medicaid program. Although this creates unique Medicaid programs in each state, states must follow some federal standards (16). These include covering all FDA-approved drugs, consistent with FDA labeling, whose manufacturers participate in Medicaid's prescription drug rebate program (19), and not discriminating in drug coverage—thus a state “may not arbitrarily deny or reduce the amount, duration, or scope of a required service … to an otherwise eligible beneficiary solely because of the diagnosis, type of illness, or condition” (20).

In 2014, the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA) issued recommendations (21) for testing, managing, and treating HCV (which are updated regularly). Little is known about the consistency in applying these guidelines by state Medicaid committees to reimbursement criteria for sofosbuvir. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate state Medicaid policies for the reimbursement of sofosbuvir for HCV treatment in the United States.

Methods

We evaluated Medicaid reimbursement criteria for sofosbuvir for all 50 states and the District of Columbia. We searched state Medicaid Web sites between 23 June and 7 December 2014. Locating criteria for coverage was difficult. Each state has different means of organizing Medicaid information online, no consistent word search was able to locate each policy, and each state required a different process to find the appropriate policies or forms. As such, this search was confined to online information. When state policy was unclear, and when states did not operate a fee-for-service pharmacy program, we indicated that the state criteria and policies were unknown. Only states with fee-for-service programs were included.

Data were extracted by 2 coauthors in duplicate and entered into a standardized spreadsheet; 2 different coauthors crosschecked the extracted data. Any differences were resolved by consensus. Each entry was double-checked by another coauthor to ascertain accuracy. For each state, the following data were extracted from Medicaid reimbursement criteria: whether sofosbuvir was covered (paid for by Medicaid) and the criteria for coverage. Most Medicaid programs require preapproval of certain medications before a patient may receive them, and providers must complete this prior authorization. For each state, Medicaid prior authorization criteria for sofosbuvir were also extracted, where available. The date of the state Medicaid reimbursement publication and uniform resource locators of the prior authorization and the preferred drug list were recorded and entered into a database (Excel, version 14.4.4 [Microsoft]).

Criteria for sofosbuvir coverage based on the following categories were recorded: liver disease stage, HIV co-infection, prescriber type, and drug or alcohol use. For criteria about liver disease staging, data were collected on the level of fibrosis required for reimbursement (either none indicated, Meta-Analysis of Histologic Data in Viral Hepatitis [METAVIR] fibrosis stage F2 or higher, or F3 or F4), eligibility for persons with decompensated cirrhosis, and whether a liver biopsy was mandatory to provide evidence of advanced fibrosis. For criteria about HIV co-infection, data were collected on whether HIV status needed to be documented, and if positive, whether the patient had to be receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) or have suppressed HIV RNA levels. For prescriber type, data were collected on whether the prescriber had to be a specialist (gastroenterology, hepatology, infectious diseases, or liver transplantation) or whether treatment decisions needed to be made in consultation with a specialist. For criteria about drug or alcohol use, data were collected on whether there were any substance-related access criteria, and if so, whether drug or alcohol counseling was required, whether patients had to be evaluated for drug and/or alcohol dependence, whether a period of abstinence was required (1, 3, 6, or 12 months) before sofosbuvir therapy, and whether drug or alcohol testing and/or treatment was required before sofosbuvir therapy.

Results

Overall, 42 states (82%), including the District of Columbia, had publicly available information about Medicaid reimbursement criteria for sofosbuvir (Tables 1 and 2 and Figures 1 and 2). Nevada is the only state that does not require prior authorization for sofosbuvir. Nine states have unknown criteria, with neither the prior authorization nor eligibility information publicly available.

Table 1. State Eligibility/Ineligibility Criteria for Sofosbuvir Approval

Table 2. State Substance Use–Related Requirements for Sofosbuvir Approval

Figure 1.

Medicaid reimbursement criteria for sofosbuvir based on documented liver fibrosis stage required for reimbursement.

METAVIR = Meta-Analysis of Histologic Data in Viral Hepatitis.

Figure 2.

Medicaid reimbursement criteria for sofosbuvir based on the required period of abstinence from drug and alcohol use.

Of the 42 states, including the District of Columbia, with known Medicaid reimbursement criteria for sofosbuvir, 81% (n = 34) restrict reimbursement on the basis of liver disease stage (Table 1). In 4 states (10%), reimbursement is restricted only to persons with cirrhosis (F4). In two thirds of states (n = 27), sofosbuvir reimbursement is restricted to persons with advanced fibrosis (F3) or cirrhosis (F4). In 2 states (5%), reimbursement is also provided for those with moderate fibrosis (F2) and in 1 state for mild fibrosis (F1). In the remaining states, no reimbursement criteria are based on disease stage (n = 8 [19%]). Sofosbuvir use is restricted in persons with decompensated cirrhosis in 7 states (17%). Colorado is the only state that explicitly includes persons with decompensated cirrhosis. Liver biopsy staging is required for demonstrating cirrhosis in 5 states (12%), although Arkansas also requires liver biopsy for evidence of bridging fibrosis (F3). In Tennessee, liver biopsy or transient elastography are the only options allowed to demonstrate cirrhosis.

Nineteen states (45%) require information about HIV status. Ten (24%) require that patients receive ART or have evidence of HIV virologic suppression.

Twenty-nine states (69%) have restrictions based on prescriber type. In 14 states (33%), the prescriber has to be a specialist (gastroenterology, hepatology, infectious diseases, or liver transplantation), whereas in 15 states (36%), treatment decisions can be made by a nonspecialist after consultation with a specialist.

Of the 42 states, including the District of Columbia, with known Medicaid reimbursement criteria for sofosbuvir, 88% (n = 37) include drug or alcohol use in their eligibility criteria for reimbursement. Eight states (19%) require that all patients be evaluated for substance use disorder or alcohol dependence, and 50% of states (n = 21) require a period of abstinence from drugs or alcohol use or abuse for all patients (Table 2). An additional 9 states (21%) require abstinence only for patients with a history of substance abuse. Most states require that all patients, regardless of history, abstain from drug and alcohol use for 6 months (n = 11), whereas others require abstinence periods of 1 month (n = 2), 3 months (n = 5), or 12 months (n = 2). Most states (n = 27 [64%]) require urine drug screening before treatment to assess drug or alcohol use, with only 6 (14%) requiring testing specifically for persons with previous drug or alcohol abuse. Six states permit persons enrolled in addiction treatment to bypass abstinence requirements. Further, 6 states require drug and alcohol counseling. Overall, 69% of states (n = 29) had restrictions based on advanced liver disease and drug or alcohol use criteria, 5% (n = 2) had restrictions based only on advanced liver disease, 19% (n = 8) had restrictions based only on drug or alcohol use criteria, and 7% (n = 3) had no restrictions on advanced liver disease or drug or alcohol use criteria.

Discussion

Considerable heterogeneity is present in Medicaid reimbursement criteria for sofosbuvir across the United States. Restrictions based on liver disease severity are common, with three quarters of states restricting sofosbuvir to persons with advanced fibrosis (F3) or cirrhosis (F4). One quarter of states require that persons living with HIV receive ART or have suppressed HIV RNA levels, whereas two thirds restrict sofosbuvir on the basis of prescriber type. Drug or alcohol use is included in the eligibility criteria of 88% of state Medicaid committees, with half requiring a period of abstinence and two thirds requiring urine drug screening. The restrictions are not consistent with the FDA-approved labeling for sofosbuvir or evidence-based recommendations and should be reconsidered (23).

Most states restrict sofosbuvir reimbursement to persons with advanced fibrosis (F3) or cirrhosis (F4), which is inconsistent with recent AASLD/IDSA recommendations (20). These recommendations state that HCV treatment is indicated for all patients with chronic HCV (regardless of disease stage) because HCV therapy is curative; improves quality of life; slows liver disease progression; and reduces the risk for cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease, HCC, and all-cause mortality (21). The recommendations state that patients at highest priority for immediate treatment include those with advanced fibrosis (F3) or compensated cirrhosis (F4) because of the higher risk for severe complications (for example, hepatic decompensation or HCC). Patients with fibrosis (F2) are listed in the next priority group for treatment because of their high risk for complications (21). However, most states do not include persons with fibrosis (F2) in their Medicaid reimbursement criteria. Note that persons with advanced fibrosis remain at risk for HCC even after achieving sustained virologic response (SVR) and must have long-term surveillance (24). In contrast, once HCV is cured in persons with mild to moderate liver disease, liver disease progression is rare. Requiring liver biopsy may pose the highest risk for death in HCV care with all-oral regimens.

The requirement that HIV-infected persons receive ART or have suppressed HIV RNA levels is also inconsistent with AASLD/IDSA recommendations indicating that persons co-infected with HIV and HCV are also at high priority for treatment because of their high risk for complications (21). HIV accelerates the HCV disease course, with faster progression to cirrhosis, liver failure, and increased HCV-related mortality (25–27). The safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir-based, interferon-free combination therapy for co-infected persons are similar to those among patients with HCV monoinfection (21, 28, 29). Reasons are varied about why co-infected persons may not receive ART (for example, normal CD4⁺ T-cell counts and low HIV RNA levels) or have suppressed HIV RNA levels (for example, drug-resistant HIV). Physicians who treat such co-infected persons may prefer to commence and complete HCV treatment first, before ART initiation, because HCV therapy is brief; further, DAA therapy often limits which antiretrovirals can be used concomitantly because of drug–drug interactions.

Two thirds of states have restrictions based on physician type, which is inconsistent with current practice whereby internists, other primary care physicians, HIV physicians not trained as infectious diseases specialists, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants treat HCV with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. The availability of sofosbuvir-based, interferon-free regimens simplifies therapy and reduces treatment-associated toxicities, which offers an opportunity for an expanded provider base for HCV treatment in patients without advanced cirrhosis (30).

The overwhelming majority of states restrict access to sofosbuvir for persons who inject drugs (PWID), those receiving treatment for drug dependency (for example, opioid substitution therapy), and those drinking alcohol. Most new and existing cases of HCV in the United States exist among current or former PWID (31). Since 2002, the National Institutes of Health HCV guidelines support HCV treatment regardless of injection drug use (32), and the AASLD/IDSA, European Association for the Study of the Liver, International Network on Hepatitis in Substance Users, and World Health Organization all advocate for inclusion of persons who use drugs in HCV treatment (21, 33–35). A growing body of evidence shows that there is no justification for systematically withholding HCV treatment from PWID (21, 33, 36). The SVR rates are similar in PWID with or without opiate replacement therapy (21, 33, 36–39). Drug use in the 6 months preceding HCV therapy initiation is not necessarily associated with poorer response to HCV therapy (40–42). Reported rates of reinfection after SVR among PWID are low—generally 1% to 5% per year, although concerns about reinfection rates in other subpopulations, such as surgeons, do not garner similar attention (33, 43). Rather than recommending the exclusion of PWID, AASLD/IDSA guidelines include PWID with earlier liver disease stages among a second-order priority group because of the prevention benefit of potential treatment; HCV treatment among PWID may decrease HCV transmission (21). In addition, evidence shows that HCV treatment of current and former PWID is cost-effective, particularly when the prevention benefits are considered (44). Further, Medicaid does not similarly deny medications for other diseases to persons who use or have used drugs or alcohol.

Alcohol misuse and HCV infection frequently coexist (45–48). Hepatitis C virus and alcohol act synergistically in causing more severe liver injury than seen with either disease alone (4, 48, 49). Persons with coexisting alcohol disorders are at a higher risk for HCV-related complications (4, 48, 49). Curing HCV is easier than curing alcohol disorders because pharmacotherapy for alcohol misuse is limited, and behavioral interventions are not always successful. The SVR rates are similar in drinkers and nondrinkers (49, 50). Further, the AASLD/IDSA recommendations have no HCV treatment restrictions regarding alcohol use.

This study examined criteria in Medicaid fee-for-service programs only—not in Medicaid managed care organizations. Results therefore reflect a subset of overall state Medicaid reimbursement criteria for sofosbuvir rather than a comprehensive catalog of all restrictions in state Medicaid programs. Future research on reimbursement criteria in Medicaid managed care organizations will be important to develop a more thorough understanding of Medicaid enrollees' access to sofosbuvir.

Current restrictions may violate federal Medicaid law, which requires states to cover drugs consistent with their FDA labels. Under the federal Medicaid statute, virtually all drugs from pharmaceutical manufacturers that have rebate agreements with the Secretary of Health and Human Services (which includes the manufacturer of sofosbuvir) must be available under state Medicaid programs, with only limited methods of restricting coverage (19). None of the restrictions on sofosbuvir coverage detailed here seem to meet the criteria for permissible restrictions. Although the price of new therapies creates financial challenges for federal and state Medicaid budgets, decisions for prioritizing patients for more immediate therapy should be based on clinical criteria and medical evidence. It is recommended that the restrictions be removed; apart from potentially being a human rights violation, they do not make (economic) sense in terms of clinical, public, and long-term health. In setting restrictions as a concession to economic constraints, the significant longer-term public health and economic benefits of curing HCV should be considered and weighed against the upfront treatment costs.

Concerns include that full coverage for HCV treatment could, in the short term, mean less coverage for other conditions. It is unrealistic, however, to expect that all potential candidates will immediately seek HCV treatment. One example of this is Massachusetts. Despite relatively unrestricted sofosbuvir access in its Medicaid fee-for-service program, recent data indicate that only 14% of Massachusetts Medicaid enrollees known to be diagnosed with HCV are engaged in treatment (51).

Transparent, easily accessible, consistent, and evidence-based Medicaid criteria will permit greater and more equitable access to DAAs. As the HCV standard of care changes over time, it will be inefficient and costly to have differing treatment access protocols in the 51 fee-for-service programs and many more Medicaid managed care plans, with all of them being revised over time. More consistency is needed across the system so that where a Medicaid patient lives does not dictate what treatment she or he receives. Although this study examined sofosbuvir in particular, the first FDA-approved DAA as part of an interferon-free regimen, Medicaid may be setting a precedent as new DAAs are approved. Medicaid policies should be responsive to changes in standards of care and new treatment developments. State Medicaid pharmacy and therapeutics committees (or their equivalent) are generally responsible for implementing these policy changes and should be expected to act as expeditiously as possible to ensure that significant clinical changes are addressed in state Medicaid programs. These data suggest that state Medicaid policies for access to new DAAs should be reviewed and revised in line with national clinical recommendations.

References

Gower
E
,
Estes
C
,
Blach
S
,
Razavi-Shearer
K
,
Razavi
H
.
Global epidemiology and genotype distribution of the hepatitis C virus infection.
J Hepatol
2014
61
S45
57
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Mohd Hanafiah
K
,
Groeger
J
,
Flaxman
AD
,
Wiersma
ST
.
Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection: new estimates of age-specific antibody to HCV seroprevalence.
Hepatology
2013
57
1333
42
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Grebely
J
,
Dore
GJ
.
What is killing people with hepatitis C virus infection?
Semin Liver Dis
2011
31
331
9
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Hajarizadeh
B
,
Grebely
J
,
Dore
GJ
.
Epidemiology and natural history of HCV infection.
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol
2013
10
553
62
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
van der Meer
AJ
,
Veldt
BJ
,
Feld
JJ
,
Wedemeyer
H
,
Dufour
JF
,
Lammert
F
,
et al
Association between sustained virological response and all-cause mortality among patients with chronic hepatitis C and advanced hepatic fibrosis.
JAMA
2012
308
2584
93
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Volk
ML
,
Tocco
R
,
Saini
S
,
Lok
AS
.
Public health impact of antiviral therapy for hepatitis C in the United States.
Hepatology
2009
50
1750
5
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Lettmeier
B
,
Mühlberger
N
,
Schwarzer
R
,
Sroczynski
G
,
Wright
D
,
Zeuzem
S
,
et al
Market uptake of new antiviral drugs for the treatment of hepatitis C.
J Hepatol
2008
49
528
36
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Butt
AA
,
Justice
AC
,
Skanderson
M
,
Rigsby
MO
,
Good
CB
,
Kwoh
CK
.
Rate and predictors of treatment prescription for hepatitis C.
Gut
2007
56
385
9
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Lawitz
E
,
Sulkowski
MS
,
Ghalib
R
,
Rodriguez-Torres
M
,
Younossi
ZM
,
Corregidor
A
,
et al
Simeprevir plus sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, to treat chronic infection with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 in non-responders to pegylated interferon and ribavirin and treatment-naive patients: the COSMOS randomised study.
Lancet
2014
384
1756
65
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Nelson
DR
,
Cooper
JN
,
Lalezari
JP
,
Lawitz
E
,
Pockros
PJ
,
Gitlin
N
,
et al
ALLY-3 Study Team
All-oral 12-week treatment with daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 3 infection: ALLY-3 phase III study.
Hepatology
2015
61
1127
35
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Afdhal
N
,
Reddy
KR
,
Nelson
DR
,
Lawitz
E
,
Gordon
SC
,
Schiff
E
,
et al
ION-2 Investigators
Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for previously treated HCV genotype 1 infection.
N Engl J Med
2014
370
1483
93
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Jacobson
IM
,
Gordon
SC
,
Kowdley
KV
,
Yoshida
EM
,
Rodriguez-Torres
M
,
Sulkowski
MS
,
et al
POSITRON Study
Sofosbuvir for hepatitis C genotype 2 or 3 in patients without treatment options.
N Engl J Med
2013
368
1867
77
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Kowdley
KV
,
Gordon
SC
,
Reddy
KR
,
Rossaro
L
,
Bernstein
DE
,
Lawitz
E
,
et al
ION-3 Investigators
Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 8 or 12 weeks for chronic HCV without cirrhosis.
N Engl J Med
2014
370
1879
88
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Lawitz
E
,
Mangia
A
,
Wyles
D
,
Rodriguez-Torres
M
,
Hassanein
T
,
Gordon
SC
,
et al
Sofosbuvir for previously untreated chronic hepatitis C infection.
N Engl J Med
2013
368
1878
87
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Reau
NS
,
Jensen
DM
.
Sticker shock and the price of new therapies for hepatitis C: is it worth it? [Editorial].
Hepatology
2014
59
1246
9
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicaid drug rebate program. Accessed at www.medicaid.gov/medicaid-chip-program-information/by-topics/benefits/prescription-drugs/medicaid-drug-rebate-program.html on 10 February 2015.
Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. State health facts: Medicaid income eligibility limits for adults as a percent of the federal poverty level. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2015. Accessed at kff.org/health-reform/state-indicator/medicaid-income-eligibility-limits-for-adults-as-a-percent-of-the-federal-poverty-level on 8 April 2015.
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2015 poverty guidelines. Accessed at aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/15poverty.cfm on 8 April 2015.
42 U.S.C. § 1396r–8. Payment for covered outpatient drugs: requirements for formularies. Accessed at www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1396r-8 on 9 June 2015.
42 C.F.R. § 440.230. Sufficiency of amount, duration, and scope. Accessed at www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/42/440.230 on 9 June 2015.
American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Recommendations for testing, managing, and treating hepatitis C. Accessed at www.hcvguidelines.org on 18 January 2015.
Arora
S
,
Thornton
K
,
Murata
G
,
Deming
P
,
Kalishman
S
,
Dion
D
,
et al
Outcomes of treatment for hepatitis C virus infection by primary care providers.
N Engl J Med
2011
364
2199
207
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Gilead Sciences. Sovaldi [package insert]. Foster City, CA: Gilead Sciences; 2014. Accessed at www.gilead.com/~/media/Files/pdfs/medicines/liver-disease/sovaldi/sovaldi_pi.pdf on 14 April 2015.
Aleman
S
,
Rahbin
N
,
Weiland
O
,
Davidsdottir
L
,
Hedenstierna
M
,
Rose
N
,
et al
A risk for hepatocellular carcinoma persists long-term after sustained virologic response in patients with hepatitis C-associated liver cirrhosis.
Clin Infect Dis
2013
57
230
6
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Lo Re
V
3rd
,
Kallan
MJ
,
Tate
JP
,
Localio
AR
,
Lim
JK
,
Goetz
MB
,
et al
Hepatic decompensation in antiretroviral-treated patients co-infected with HIV and hepatitis C virus compared with hepatitis C virus-monoinfected patients: a cohort study.
Ann Intern Med
2014
160
369
79
PubMed
Chen
TY
,
Ding
EL
,
SeageIii
GR
,
Kim
AY
.
Meta-analysis: increased mortality associated with hepatitis C in HIV-infected persons is unrelated to HIV disease progression.
Clin Infect Dis
2009
49
1605
15
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Weber
R
,
Sabin
CA
,
Friis-Møller
N
,
Reiss
P
,
El-Sadr
WM
,
Kirk
O
,
et al
Liver-related deaths in persons infected with the human immunodeficiency virus: the D:A:D study.
Arch Intern Med
2006
166
1632
41
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
European Association for the Study of the Liver
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of hepatitis C virus infection.
J Hepatol
2014
60
392
420
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Sulkowski
MS
,
Naggie
S
,
Lalezari
J
,
Fessel
WJ
,
Mounzer
K
,
Shuhart
M
,
et al
PHOTON-1 Investigators
Sofosbuvir and ribavirin for hepatitis C in patients with HIV coinfection.
JAMA
2014
312
353
61
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Kottilil
S
,
Wright
M
,
Polis
MA
,
Masur
H
.
Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection: is it time for the internist to take the reins?
Ann Intern Med
2014
161
443
4
CrossRef

PubMed
Williams
I
.
Epidemiology of hepatitis C in the United States.
Am J Med
1999
107
2S
9S
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; National Institutes of Health; NIH Consensus Development Program; Office of Disease Prevention. Management of Hepatitis C: 2002: National Institutes of Health consensus conference statement, 10–12 June 2002. Accessed at consensus.nih.gov/2002/2002hepatitisc2002116html.htm on 19 December 2014.
Robaeys
G
,
Grebely
J
,
Mauss
S
,
Bruggmann
P
,
Moussalli
J
,
De Gottardi
A
,
et al
International Network on Hepatitis in Substance Users
Recommendations for the management of hepatitis C virus infection among people who inject drugs.
Clin Infect Dis
2013
57 Suppl 2
S129
37
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
European Association for the Study of the Liver
EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C 2014.
J Hepatol
2014
61
373
95
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
World Health Organization. Guidelines for the screening, care and treatment of persons with hepatitis C infection: April 2014. Accessed at apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/111747/1/9789241548755_eng.pdf on 18 December 2014.
European Association for the Study of the Liver
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of hepatitis C virus infection.
J Hepatol
2011
55
245
64
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Hellard
M
,
Sacks-Davis
R
,
Gold
J
.
Hepatitis C treatment for injection drug users: a review of the available evidence.
Clin Infect Dis
2009
49
561
73
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Mauss
S
,
Berger
F
,
Goelz
J
,
Jacob
B
,
Schmutz
G
.
A prospective controlled study of interferon-based therapy of chronic hepatitis C in patients on methadone maintenance.
Hepatology
2004
40
120
4
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Matthews
G
,
Kronborg
IJ
,
Dore
GJ
.
Treatment for hepatitis C virus infection among current injection drug users in Australia.
Clin Infect Dis
2005
40 Suppl 5
S325
9
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Sylvestre
DL
,
Litwin
AH
,
Clements
BJ
,
Gourevitch
MN
.
The impact of barriers to hepatitis C virus treatment in recovering heroin users maintained on methadone.
J Subst Abuse Treat
2005
29
159
65
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Grebely
J
,
Raffa
JD
,
Meagher
C
,
Duncan
F
,
Genoway
KA
,
Khara
M
,
et al
Directly observed therapy for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in current and former injection drug users.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol
2007
22
1519
25
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Dore
GJ
,
Hellard
M
,
Matthews
GV
,
Grebely
J
,
Haber
PS
,
Petoumenos
K
,
et al
Australian Trial In Acute Hepatitis C Study Group
Effective treatment of injecting drug users with recently acquired hepatitis C virus infection.
Gastroenterology
2010
138
123
35
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Aspinall
EJ
,
Corson
S
,
Doyle
JS
,
Grebely
J
,
Hutchinson
SJ
,
Dore
GJ
,
et al
Treatment of hepatitis C virus infection among people who are actively injecting drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clin Infect Dis
2013
57 Suppl 2
S80
9
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Martin
NK
,
Vickerman
P
,
Miners
A
,
Foster
GR
,
Hutchinson
SJ
,
Goldberg
DJ
,
et al
Cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C virus antiviral treatment for injection drug user populations.
Hepatology
2012
55
49
57
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Singal
AK
,
Anand
BS
.
Mechanisms of synergy between alcohol and hepatitis C virus.
J Clin Gastroenterol
2007
41
761
72
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Rosman
AS
,
Waraich
A
,
Galvin
K
,
Casiano
J
,
Paronetto
F
,
Lieber
CS
.
Alcoholism is associated with hepatitis C but not hepatitis B in an urban population.
Am J Gastroenterol
1996
91
498
505
PubMed
PubMed
Hutchinson
SJ
,
Bird
SM
,
Goldberg
DJ
.
Influence of alcohol on the progression of hepatitis C virus infection: a meta-analysis.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
2005
3
1150
9
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Corrao
G
,
Aricò
S
.
Independent and combined action of hepatitis C virus infection and alcohol consumption on the risk of symptomatic liver cirrhosis.
Hepatology
1998
27
914
9
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Anand
BS
,
Currie
S
,
Dieperink
E
,
Bini
EJ
,
Shen
H
,
Ho
SB
,
et al
VA-HCV-001 Study Group
Alcohol use and treatment of hepatitis C virus: results of a national multicenter study.
Gastroenterology
2006
130
1607
16
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Le Lan
C
,
Guillygomarc'h
A
,
Danielou
H
,
Le Dréau
G
,
Lainé
F
,
Védeilhié
C
,
et al
A multi-disciplinary approach to treating hepatitis C with interferon and ribavirin in alcohol-dependent patients with ongoing abuse.
J Hepatol
2012
56
334
40
PubMed
CrossRef

PubMed
Graham CS, Greenwald R, Lenz K. Understanding the reimbursement environment in hepatitis C. Presented at Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, 6 April 2015. Accessed at www.chlpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/HCV_DPH_Payer_4_5_15_combined_final.pdf on 8 June 2015.

Author Insight Video - Lynn E. Taylor, MD (3:12)

In this video, Lynn E. Taylor, MD, and colleagues offer additional insight into their article, "Restrictions for Medicaid Reimbursement of Sofosbuvir for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the United States."

This feature is available only to Registered Users

Subscribe/Learn More

2 Comments

Donald Venes, MD

None

July 4, 2015

Theory and Practice

The authors should be commended for their academic and legal analysis of sofosbuvir prescription limitations for Medicaid patients. In theory it would be ideal if every Hepatitis C patient received treatment without limits. In practice, however, if the authors' ideal were reached, a back-of-the-envelope calculation indicates that drug treatment for Americans with HCV would total ~$2.5 x 10 raised to the 11th power, prior to factoring in the cost of health care personnel (doctors, nurse, pharmacists, LVNs, laboratorians, administrators ...), buildings, labs, light, heat, power, training, re-training, refrigeration, etc. These sums would exceed the current Gross National Product of all but a handful of nations on earth. If HCV were treated according to the authors' ideal, money for education, eldercare, roads, other diseases, national defense, and every other social good would be zeroed out. The ideal society, in the authors' view, is one free of HCV infection but otherwise in shambles.

Colleen Flanigan RN MS, Bruce Agins MD MPH, Charles Gonzalez MD, Ira Feldman, Franklin Laufer PhD

New York State Department of Health, AIDS Institute, Albany, New York

July 30, 2015

Defining an experienced hepatitis C provider

TO THE EDITOR,

Barua and colleagues (1) provide a comprehensive summary of the restrictions imposed by state Medicaid programs for access and reimbursement of Sofosbuvir treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The authors categorize New York State’s (NYS) Medicaid program as limiting Sofosbuvir prescribing solely to hepatologists, gastroenterologists, infectious disease or liver transplantation physicians. This information does not reflect the state’s current clinical criteria for prescribing Sofosbuvir. NYS’s Medicaid program posted its clinical criteria for Sofosbuvir in October 2014 (http://www.health.ny.gov/health_care/medicaid/program/dur/hepa_c_virus.htm). This may have occurred after the authors conducted their review of states’ criteria.

Currently, NYS’s Medicaid program does not restrict HCV treatment prescribing to specialists. In fact, the NYS Department of Health AIDS Institute, along with its HCV Clinical Guidelines Committee, has developed criteria for defining “experienced HCV clinicians” to ensure that patients are being treated by clinicians with the appropriate level of expertise to deliver the necessary care to persons with HCV that meets current quality standards. The criteria consist of three components: clinical management, continuing education and licensure. Providers must meet all three criteria. Clinical experience and appropriate continuing education are both important to ensure that HCV medications are prescribed safely and correctly and that all patients receive the highest quality of care. These criteria have been adopted by the NYS Medicaid program and by most of the state’s Medicaid managed care plans. Additional information on the definition of an experienced HCV provider can be obtained by going to: http://www.hivguidelines.org/clinical-guidelines/hepatitis-c-virus-mono-infection/defining-the-experienced-hepatitis-c-provider/

NYS has taken many steps to ensure access to these highly effective medications, including providing funding to primary care settings to integrate HCV care, treatment and supportive services; the development of guidelines for the management and treatment of HCV by primary care providers; and the derivation of HCV quality indicators.

References
Barua S, Greenwald R, Grebely J, Dore GJ, Swan T, Taylor LE. Restrictions for Medicaid reimbursement of Sofosbuvir for the treatment of Hepatitis C virus in the United States. Ann Intern Med. Published online 30 June 2015 doi:10.7326/M15-0406.

PDF

Not Available

Related Point of Care

Hepatitis C Virus

Annals of Internal Medicine; 165 (5): ITC33-ITC48

Hepatitis C

Annals of Internal Medicine; 157 (11): ITC6-1

Hepatitis C

Annals of Internal Medicine; 148 (11): ITC6-1

Hepatitis C Virus (Japanese Version)

Annals of Internal Medicine; 165 (5): JITC33-JITC48

View MoreView Less

Medicine and Public Issues |4 August 2015

Restrictions for Medicaid Reimbursement of Sofosbuvir for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the United States Free

Abstract

Methods