Skip Navigation
American College of Physicians Logo
  • Subscribe
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Sign In
    Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
    INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
    Sign In|Set Up Account
    You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
    INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN
    Open Athens|Shibboleth|Log In
    Annals of Internal Medicine
    SUBSCRIBE
    Subscribe to Annals of Internal Medicine.
    You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your purchase.
Annals of Internal Medicine Logo Menu
  • Latest
  • Issues
  • Channels
  • CME/MOC
  • In the Clinic
  • Journal Club
  • Web Exclusives
  • Author Info
Advanced Search
  • ‹ PREV ARTICLE
  • This Issue
  • NEXT ARTICLE ›
Medicine and Public Issues |2 August 2016

Yes, You Can: Physicians, Patients, and Firearms Free

Garen J. Wintemute, MD, MPH; Marian E. Betz, MD, MPH; Megan L. Ranney, MD, MPH

Garen J. Wintemute, MD, MPH
From UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California; University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado; and Rhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

Marian E. Betz, MD, MPH
From UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California; University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado; and Rhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

Megan L. Ranney, MD, MPH
From UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California; University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado; and Rhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

Article, Author, and Disclosure Information
Author, Article, and Disclosure Information
This article was published at www.annals.org on 17 May 2016.
  • From UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California; University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado; and Rhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

    Acknowledgment: The authors thank Vanessa McHenry of the Violence Prevention Research Program for her expert assistance with the manuscript.

    Grant Support: Dr. Wintemute's work on this project was supported in part by grant 2014-255 from The California Wellness Foundation.

    Disclosures: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M15-2905.

    Requests for Single Reprints: Garen J. Wintemute, MD, MPH, Violence Prevention Research Program, UC Davis Medical Center, 2315 Stockton Boulevard, Sacramento, CA 95817; e-mail, vprp@ucdavis.edu.

    Current Author Addresses: Dr. Wintemute: Violence Prevention Research Program, UC Davis Medical Center, 2315 Stockton Boulevard, Sacramento, CA 95817.

    Dr. Betz: University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12401 East 17th Avenue, B-215, Aurora, CO 80045.

    Dr. Ranney: Rhode Island Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy Street, Claverick 2, Providence, RI 02903.

    Author Contributions: Conception and design: G.J. Wintemute, M.L. Ranney.

    Analysis and interpretation of the data: G.J. Wintemute, M.E. Betz, M.L. Ranney.

    Drafting of the article: G.J. Wintemute, M.E. Betz, M.L. Ranney.

    Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: G.J. Wintemute, M.E. Betz, M.L. Ranney.

    Final approval of the article: G.J. Wintemute, M.E. Betz, M.L. Ranney.

    Obtaining of funding: G.J. Wintemute.

    Collection and assembly of data: G.J. Wintemute, M.E. Betz, M.L. Ranney.

×
  • ‹ PREV ARTICLE
  • This Issue
  • NEXT ARTICLE ›
Jump To
  • Full Article
  • FULL ARTICLE
  • FULL ARTICLE
    • Abstract
    • You Can Ask
    • When to Ask
    • Barriers
    • Benefits
    • How to Ask and Counsel
    • You Can Disclose
    • Conclusions
      1. References
  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplements
  • Audio/Video
  • Summary for Patients
  • Clinical Slide Sets
  • CME / MOC
  • Comments
  • Twitter Link
  • Facebook Link
  • Email Link
More
  • LinkedIn Link
  • CiteULike Link

Abstract

Physicians have unique opportunities to help prevent firearm violence. Concern has developed that federal and state laws or regulations prohibit physicians from asking or counseling patients about firearms and disclosing patient information about firearms to others, even when threats to health and safety may be involved. This is not the case. In this article, the authors explain the statutes in question, emphasizing that physicians may ask about firearms (with rare exceptions), may counsel about firearms as they do about other health matters, and may disclose information to third parties when necessary. The authors then review circumstances under which questions about firearms might be most appropriate if they are not asked routinely. Such circumstances include instances when the patient provides information or exhibits behavior suggesting an acutely increased risk for violence, whether to himself or others, or when the patient possesses other individual-level risk factors for violence, such as alcohol abuse. The article summarizes the literature on current physician practices in asking and counseling about firearms, which are done far less commonly than recommended. Barriers to engaging in those practices, the effectiveness of clinical efforts to prevent firearm-related injuries, and what patients think about such efforts and physicians who engage in them are discussed. Proceeding from the limited available evidence, the authors make specific recommendations on how physicians might counsel their patients to reduce their risk for firearm-related death or serious injury. Finally, the authors review the circumstances under which disclosure of patient information about firearms to third parties is supported by regulations implementing the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.

In 2014, a total of 33 599 Americans died of gunshot wounds (1). Although the risk for firearm-related homicide is highest among young African American men, most firearm-related deaths are suicides, for which older white men are at highest risk (2). Public mass shootings account for a small percentage of firearm-related deaths but are occurring more frequently and could affect the character of public life in the United States (3). In early 2013, more than 40% of Americans worried that they could fall victim to firearm-related homicide or assault (4).
Physicians seek to prevent important health problems at the individual and population levels. They inquire and counsel—routinely in some cases, selectively in others—about a wide range of health-related behaviors and conditions. In certain circumstances, they disclose otherwise confidential information to third parties to limit the risk an affected person poses to others.
Physicians generally do not do well at firearm-related injury prevention, however. They ask infrequently about firearms and counsel poorly, if at all, although they are aware that the high lethality of firearms makes prevention efforts particularly important.
In this article, we examine several commonly cited barriers to practicing preventive medicine for firearm-related injuries. Some physicians believe that it is against the law to discuss firearms; we show that this belief is unfounded. We then discuss the circumstances in which prevention efforts might be most appropriate. We briefly review other barriers to their more widespread adoption, patients' opinions about physicians addressing firearms, and the effectiveness of such prevention practices; more extensive information is available elsewhere (5, 6). We offer specific recommendations, based on the limited evidence available, for how physicians can incorporate firearm-related injury prevention into the care of their patients.

You Can Ask

No federal or state statute prohibits physicians from asking about firearms when such information is relevant to the health of the patient or others.

Federal Statute

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) regulates the collection of firearm information, but the scope of these provisions is narrow (Table 1). Most important, the ACA prohibits required collection of firearm information by “wellness and health promotion” programs. The Obama administration's position was reflected in a January 2013 White House announcement that, to “protect the rights of health care providers to talk to their patients about gun safety,” it would issue guidance clarifying that the ACA does not regulate communication between physicians and patients about firearms (7). The U.S. Department of Labor repeated this clarification (8); to our knowledge, this guidance has not been issued.

Table 1. Language From Relevant Federal and State Statutes*

Table 1. Language From Relevant Federal and State Statutes*

State Statutes

Florida

The only existing gag law is Florida's medical privacy act concerning firearms (Table 1), enacted in 2011 after a series of inflammatory incidents occurred during clinician–patient interactions. In one widely publicized incident, a pediatrician in Ocala discharged from care 3 children whose mother declined to answer questions about firearms (9, 10).
Florida's law is seen as intruding on the patient–physician relationship (11). Its key provisions hold that health practitioners “should refrain” from asking about firearms and “may not intentionally enter” firearm information into medical records. There are broad exceptions, however. A practitioner who “in good faith believes that this information is relevant to the patient's medical care or safety, or the safety of others” may ask about firearms, and only information that “is not relevant to the patient's medical care or safety, or the safety of others” is excluded from medical records (12).
Physicians and medical professional organizations challenged the law in U.S. District Court, contending that it unduly restricted their First Amendment rights. They were successful (9), but that decision was overturned by a divided 3-judge panel in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (10, 13). In February 2016, the full court vacated its panel's decision and agreed to rehear the case (14). The District Court decision remains in effect.

Other States

Three states—Montana, Missouri, and Minnesota—have statutes addressing firearm information acquired by health practitioners or agencies. None includes a gag provision. Montana prohibits requiring patients to provide firearm information as a condition of receiving health care (15). Missouri prohibits requiring that health professionals collect or record firearm information, but with an exception “if such inquiry or documentation is necessitated or medically indicated by the health care professional's judgment” (16). Minnesota prohibits collection of firearm information by its state health commissioner and MNsure, the agency administering its health insurance exchange (17, 18).
More restrictive proposals have been considered elsewhere. In 2015, North Carolina's legislature debated prohibiting the collection of firearm information in any written form and the disclosure of responses to firearm-related questions “unless the patient has been adjudicated incompetent due to mental illness” (19). A true gag law proposal was introduced in Ohio in June 2015: “A physician shall not ask a patient or prospective patient … [any] question related to the ownership or possession of a firearm” (20). As of April 2016, no action had been taken on this bill.

When to Ask

Firearm information would be directly relevant to the health of an individual patient and that patient's close contacts under 3 general conditions (Table 2). Where physician preference or simple lack of time precludes routine screening for firearm access, physicians could identify patients for whom these conditions apply and proceed selectively.

Table 2. Conditions When Firearm Information Might Be Particularly Relevant to the Health of a Patient and Potentially to Others

Table 2. Conditions When Firearm Information Might Be Particularly Relevant to the Health of a Patient and Potentially to Others
The first arises when a patient provides information or exhibits behavior suggesting an acutely increased risk for violence, such as explicit or implicit endorsement of suicidal or homicidal intent or ideation. This is an emergency; the need to determine access to lethal means for such patients is self-evident.
The second involves patients who possess other individual-level risk factors for future violence. A history of violence perpetration is a strong predictor of future violence in the general population (21) and among firearm owners (22). Similarly, patients hospitalized or treated in emergency departments for violent victimization are at high risk for committing violence (23, 24). Alcohol abuse is common in the general population and among firearm owners (25) and is a well-established risk factor for interpersonal and self-directed firearm violence (26). Drug abuse is another risk factor, but the magnitude of the risk may be drug-specific (27).
Serious mental illness is a relatively minor risk factor for violence to others, and risk depends on the nature of the illness (28, 29). Alcohol and drug abuse, prior violence, and violent victimization account for much of the risk popularly ascribed to mental illness (30, 31). Self-directed violence is very strongly linked to mental illness, however. Suicide risk is increased by a factor of at least 10 across a range of psychiatric diagnoses, and an estimated 47% to 74% of suicides are directly attributable to mental disorders (30). Violence risk is particularly high among patients seen for mental illness in emergency departments, recently discharged psychiatric inpatients, and persons experiencing a first psychotic episode (30). Brain disorders associated with impaired cognition and judgment, such as Alzheimer disease, are associated with an increased risk for aggression and violence (32).
Third, questions about firearms would be relevant for patients in demographic groups that are at increased risk for firearm-related injury. Middle-aged and older white men are at high risk for firearm-related suicide (up to 5 times higher than black men of the same age), and young African American men are 20 times as likely as young white men to die of firearm-related homicide (1). Children and adolescents may engage in risk behaviors with firearms because their judgment and cognitive skills are not fully developed (33).
Persons with risk factors, including substance abuse disorders, diagnosed mental illness, impulsive anger, suicidal ideation, and dementia, report access to firearms at levels similar to those in the general population (34–39). Persons with multiple risk factors are a high-priority group, because risk is likely more than additive in such cases (22, 40).
Questions about firearms may be appropriate when the patient is not a firearm owner, given that risk for victimization may extend to all household members if one is at risk for violence and firearms are present. For example, firearm-related questions would be appropriate if a patient's intimate partner exhibited violence and abused alcohol.

Barriers

High proportions of physicians (66% to 84%) believe they have the right to counsel patients about firearms (41) and a responsibility to engage in efforts to prevent firearm-related injuries (42, 43). The American Academy of Pediatrics has long recommended that physicians provide counseling (44); since the passage of the Florida law, many other medical specialty societies have made similar recommendations (45).
Actual practice is another matter. Screening and counseling about firearms is uncommon, whether as anticipatory guidance (46) or a selective intervention (47–49). For example, in a study of veterans who screened positive for suicidal thoughts, only 15% of providers documented whether patients had access to firearms (50).
Many barriers exist. Perhaps the most important is clinician unfamiliarity with the benefits and risks of firearm ownership, with what to say during firearm safety counseling and how to say it, and with firearms themselves (41, 43, 48, 51–53). It is prudent to avoid areas of practice when one is unfamiliar with the evidence, and in fairness, too little solid evidence exists. These barriers can be addressed through training (54) and through development of information about referral resources (55, 56).
Physicians may worry about damaging the patient relationship (48) by asking questions that seem intrusive or invite discord (57). They may feel uncomfortable asking about firearms, even when they are well-informed (48, 51), or worry that patients will not be truthful (48). Some may believe that firearm counseling is outside their scope of practice (51, 57) or that discussing firearms could infringe on patients' Second Amendment rights (43, 58). Fortunately, studies of patient perspectives on firearm counseling have found that most—although certainly not all—patients seem to be open to nonjudgmental education, especially for members of high-risk groups (48, 57, 59). The American Bar Association has stated that Second Amendment rights are not affected by asking and counseling about firearms (45). Finally, clinicians may doubt the effectiveness of firearm counseling, especially given time limitations and competing clinical priorities (43, 51, 60).

Benefits

Research on practices to prevent firearm-related injury is in its infancy; too few studies have been done. For example, a recent systematic review identified no studies of the accuracy or predictive value of screening for firearm access among high-risk patients (5). Such absence of evidence is common. Except for a few behavioral screens endorsed by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (61), there are few clinically based studies of valid screening tools for other frequently encountered risk behaviors. Nonetheless, the Joint Commission has, for example, mandated screening for suicide among high-risk inpatient and emergency department populations (62). Because firearms are the most common means of violent death in the United States, the lack of rigorously validated tools should not, in itself, deter screening.
Many, but not all, studies of clinical interventions to prevent firearm-related injuries have shown increased firearm safety behaviors among populations at high risk for injury. No interventions have resulted in harm (5, 6).
Most studies have assessed interventions in primary care settings. In one randomized, controlled trial, a screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) intervention involving specially trained pediatricians led to increased safe firearm storage in households with children (63). Other observational and intervention studies have had positive results, including decreased firearm access among suicidal teens and adults (64, 65) and increased safe firearm storage in households with children (66–69). After brief counseling by a psychiatrist, for example, almost one third of suicidal adolescents' families removed a firearm from the home (68). Because there was no control population, we do not know how many families would have removed a firearm without intervention. Firearm counseling may be less effective when combined with other interventions or delivered universally (70–72).
Hospital- and emergency department–based interventions using SBIRT methods or comprehensive case management have shown promise in reducing the risk for repeated violence (73, 74). A randomized trial of a collaborative care program, including brief interventions, comprehensive case management, and as-needed mental health treatment, showed decreased weapon carrying among adolescents hospitalized after an injury (75). Many studies have relied on surrogate outcomes or had shortcomings in design or execution, such as frequent loss to follow-up. Controlled trials and a systematic review now in progress (74) will hopefully clarify the role of these interventions.

How to Ask and Counsel

The provider's attitude is critical (76). Patients are more open to firearm safety counseling when providers are not prescriptive but focus on well-being and safety—especially where children are concerned—and involve the family in respectful discussions (48, 57). Conversations should acknowledge local cultural norms (57); be individualized (48); and, when possible, occur within a well-established clinician–patient relationship (57). Acute care physicians, such as hospitalists and emergency physicians, should intervene when risk is increased or they encounter a teachable moment. We suggest, “Don't just ask, inform”; emphasize education, not just information gathering (48, 57).
Giving a context for firearm-related questions can enhance the interaction. For anticipatory guidance, a firearm-related question can be included in routine screening for household hazards or risk behaviors (57). For selective screening in patients with other risk factors, we recommend that clinicians briefly explain why firearms might be relevant to the patient's well-being and safety.
The first question might simply be, “Are any firearms kept in or around your home?” When the answer is “yes,” 2 follow-up questions are important: “Do any of these firearms belong to you personally?” and “Are any of these firearms stored loaded and not locked away?”
What to do with the answers depends on the circumstances (Table 2). Questions and advice about safe storage might make use of the “5 Ls” mnemonic (Locked, Loaded, Little children, feeling Low, Learned owner [77, 78]), accompanied by a nonjudgmental educational handout (Table 3) and information on firearm storage devices (Table 4). The desired outcome is that firearms are stored unloaded and locked, with ammunition stored separately. Safe storage is less common when other risk factors are present.

Table 3. Materials for Distribution to Patients

Table 3. Materials for Distribution to Patients

Table 4. Firearm Safe Storage Options*

Table 4. Firearm Safe Storage Options*
For patients at risk for violence, counseling to reduce access to lethal means of harm (“lethal means counseling”) (69, 79) is indicated; mental health, social service, and substance abuse referrals may be appropriate. It may become important for the patient to temporarily relinquish custody of firearms to family members, gun shops, or law enforcement, as allowed by state law. California's new Gun Violence Restraining Order statute allows family members or law enforcement officers to petition for a court order that firearms be recovered for safekeeping in such cases (80). Connecticut, Indiana, and Texas also allow for mandated firearm recovery. Other states may soon follow.
The advisability of having firearms at home may come up for discussion. Clinicians can point to a large body of evidence establishing that, on balance, firearms in the home (81) and purchasing a handgun (82) are associated with a substantial and long-lasting increased risk for violent death.

You Can Disclose

The Code of Federal Regulations, in provisions governing the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, lists specific situations in which protected health information may be disclosed (83). These include occasions when disclosure “is necessary to prevent or lessen a serious and imminent threat to the health or safety of a person or the public and … is to a person or persons reasonably able to prevent or lessen the threat, including the target of the threat.”
The Obama administration has emphasized that disclosure is permissible: “No federal law prevents health care providers from warning law enforcement authorities about threats of violence” (7). A letter from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services added that “a health care provider may disclose patient information, including information from mental health records, if necessary, to law enforcement, family members of the patient, or any other persons who may reasonably be able to prevent or lessen the risk of harm” (84).
There is no agreed-on definition of the key term “imminent”; in research on violence prediction, it describes time frames ranging from a few days to months (85). Elsewhere in the Code of Federal Regulations, an imminent hazard is defined as one that may cause harm before it can be alleviated by a formal regulatory action.
There is also no clear guidance on informing patients of such disclosures. The American College of Physicians (ACP) Ethics Manual states, “In general, individuals have the right to full and detailed [information]” (86). Timing and other specifics will vary because “upsetting news and information should be presented … in a way that minimizes distress.” Citing the American Medical Association (AMA) Code of Medical Ethics (87), ACP's manual adds that decisions not to inform patients (once referred to as therapeutic privilege) should be rare. However, the AMA Code stresses that “therapeutic privilege does not refer to withholding medical information in emergency situations” and allows for delayed disclosure even in nonemergency situations (87). As in domestic violence and child abuse cases, providers should proceed from a right-to-know position, determining when and whether a patient is informed on the basis of the provider's assessment of the patient's cognitive status and “the balance of benefits and harms” (87) expected to result from providing the information.

Conclusions

Medical specialty societies recommend asking and counseling about firearms during routine patient care or as an element of risk assessment (45). Neither the law nor the Second Amendment prohibits such activities, and the First Amendment may protect them. The limited evidence on effectiveness is encouraging, and the need for additional research should not impede efforts to provide patient care consistent with the best information available (Table 5).

Table 5. Additional Resources

Table 5. Additional Resources
More training and better resource are needed. A systematic review identified only 4 reports on the development and assessment of training for clinicians (88). Input from clinician and nonclinician firearm owners is important (51). Collaborations with firearm retailers to prevent suicide are being tested in New England, the Rocky Mountain states, and Washington and may become important (89).
We recommend that, at a minimum, clinicians determine access to firearms for patients who fall into any of the risk categories discussed previously. Depending on the circumstances, interventions may include education; counseling in support of behavior change; or more direct efforts, such as disclosure to others, to prevent death or serious injury.

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Injury Prevention & Control: Data & Statistics (WISQARS). Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014. Accessed at www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html on 11 April 2016.
  2. Wintemute
    GJ
    .  
    The epidemiology of firearm violence in the twenty-first century United States.
    Annu Rev Public Health
    2015
    36
    5
    19
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  3. Krouse
    WJ
    ,  
    Richardson
    DJ
    .  
    Mass Murder with Firearms: Incidents and Victims, 1999–2013. Report no. R44126.
    Washington, DC
    Congressional Research Service
    2015
  4. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health Tracking Poll. Menlo Park, CA: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2013. Accessed at https://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/8418-t1.pdf on 24 August 2015.
  5. Roszko
    PJ
    ,  
    Ameli
    J
    ,  
    Carter
    PM
    ,  
    Cunningham
    RM
    ,  
    Ranney
    ML
    .  
    Clinician attitudes, screening practices, and interventions to reduce firearm-related injury.
    Epidemiol Rev
    2016
    38
    87
    110
    PubMed
    PubMed
  6. Rowhani-Rahbar
    A
    ,  
    Simonetti
    JA
    ,  
    Rivara
    FP
    .  
    Effectiveness of interventions to promote safe firearm storage.
    Epidemiol Rev
    2016
    38
    111
    24
    PubMed
    PubMed
  7. The White House. Now Is the Time: The President's Plan to Protect Our Children and Our Communities by Reducing Gun Violence. Washington, DC: The White House; 2013. Accessed at www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/wh_now_is_the_time_full.pdf on 21 January 2013.
  8. U.S. Department of Labor. FAQs about Affordable Care Act Implementation Part XI. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor; 2013. Accessed at www.dol.gov/ebsa/faqs/faq-aca11.html on 1 September 2015.
  9. Wollschlaeger et al v. Farmer et al. 880 F Supp 2d 1251 (SD Fla 2012).
  10. Wollschlaeger et al v Governor of Florida et al. 760 F3d 1195 (11th Cir 2014).
  11. Weinberger
    SE
    ,  
    Lawrence
    HC
    3rd
    ,  
    Henley
    DE
    ,  
    Alden
    ER
    ,  
    Hoyt
    DB
    .  
    Legislative interference with the patient-physician relationship.
    N Engl J Med
    2012
    367
    1557
    9
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  12. Fla. Stat. Ann. §790.338 (2015).
  13. Wollschlaeger et al v Governor of Florida et al: On Petition for Rehearing. 797 F3d 859 (11th Cir 2015).
  14. Wollschlaeger et al v Governor of Florida et al: Order for Rehearing. 797 F3d 859 (11th Cir 2016).
  15. Mont. Code Ann. §50-16-108 (2014).
  16. Mo. Rev. Stat. §571.012 (2015).
  17. Minn. Stat. §144.05 (2015).
  18. Minn. Stat. §62V.06 (2015).
  19. HR 562, Sess 2015 (N.C. 2015).
  20. S 177, 131st Sess (Ohio 2015).
  21. Cook
    PJ
    ,  
    Ludwig
    J
    ,  
    Braga
    AA
    .  
    Criminal records of homicide offenders.
    JAMA
    2005
    294
    598
    601
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  22. Wintemute
    GJ
    ,  
    Drake
    CM
    ,  
    Beaumont
    JJ
    ,  
    Wright
    MA
    ,  
    Parham
    CA
    .  
    Prior misdemeanor convictions as a risk factor for later violent and firearm-related criminal activity among authorized purchasers of handguns.
    JAMA
    1998
    280
    2083
    7
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  23. Rowhani-Rahbar
    A
    ,  
    Zatzick
    D
    ,  
    Wang
    J
    ,  
    Mills
    BM
    ,  
    Simonetti
    JA
    ,  
    Fan
    MD
    .  
    et al
    Firearm-related hospitalization and risk for subsequent violent injury, death, or crime perpetration: a cohort study.
    Ann Intern Med
    2015
    162
    492
    500
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  24. Cunningham
    RM
    ,  
    Carter
    PM
    ,  
    Ranney
    M
    ,  
    Zimmerman
    MA
    ,  
    Blow
    FC
    ,  
    Booth
    BM
    .  
    et al
    Violent reinjury and mortality among youth seeking emergency department care for assault-related injury: a 2-year prospective cohort study.
    JAMA Pediatr
    2015
    169
    63
    70
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  25. Wintemute
    GJ
    .  
    Association between firearm ownership, firearm-related risk and risk reduction behaviours and alcohol-related risk behaviours.
    Inj Prev
    2011
    17
    422
    7
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  26. Wintemute
    GJ
    .  
    Alcohol misuse, firearm violence perpetration, and public policy in the United States.
    Prev Med
    2015
    79
    15
    21
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  27. McGinty
    EE
    ,  
    Choksy
    S
    ,  
    Wintemute
    GJ
    .  
    The relationship between controlled substances and violence.
    Epidemiol Rev
    2016
    38
    5
    31
    PubMed
    PubMed
  28. Pulay
    AJ
    ,  
    Dawson
    DA
    ,  
    Hasin
    DS
    ,  
    Goldstein
    RB
    ,  
    Ruan
    WJ
    ,  
    Pickering
    RP
    .  
    et al
    Violent behavior and DSM-IV psychiatric disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.
    J Clin Psychiatry
    2008
    69
    12
    22
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  29. Van Dorn
    R
    ,  
    Volavka
    J
    ,  
    Johnson
    N
    .  
    Mental disorder and violence: is there a relationship beyond substance use?
    Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol
    2012
    47
    487
    503
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  30. Swanson
    JW
    ,  
    McGinty
    EE
    ,  
    Fazel
    S
    ,  
    Mays
    VM
    .  
    Mental illness and reduction of gun violence and suicide: bringing epidemiologic research to policy.
    Ann Epidemiol
    2015
    25
    366
    76
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  31. Johnson KL, Desmarais SL, Grimm KJ, Tueller SJ, Swartz MS, Van Dorn RA. Proximal risk factors for short-term community violence among adults with mental illnesses. Psychiatr Serv. 2016:appips201500259.
  32. Liljegren
    M
    ,  
    Naasan
    G
    ,  
    Temlett
    J
    ,  
    Perry
    DC
    ,  
    Rankin
    KP
    ,  
    Merrilees
    J
    .  
    et al
    Criminal behavior in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease.
    JAMA Neurol
    2015
    72
    295
    300
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  33. Dowd
    MD
    ,  
    Sege
    RD
    .  
    Council on Injury, Violence, and Poison Prevention Executive Committee
    Firearm-related injuries affecting the pediatric population.
    Pediatrics
    2012
    130
    e1416
    23
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  34. Swanson
    JW
    ,  
    Sampson
    NA
    ,  
    Petukhova
    MV
    ,  
    Zaslavsky
    AM
    ,  
    Appelbaum
    PS
    ,  
    Swartz
    MS
    .  
    et al
    Guns, impulsive angry behavior, and mental disorders: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R).
    Behav Sci Law
    2015
    33
    199
    212
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  35. Ilgen
    MA
    ,  
    Zivin
    K
    ,  
    McCammon
    RJ
    ,  
    Valenstein
    M
    .  
    Mental illness, previous suicidality, and access to guns in the United States.
    Psychiatr Serv
    2008
    59
    198
    200
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  36. Miller
    M
    ,  
    Barber
    C
    ,  
    Azrael
    D
    ,  
    Hemenway
    D
    ,  
    Molnar
    BE
    .  
    Recent psychopathology, suicidal thoughts and suicide attempts in households with and without firearms: findings from the National Comorbidity Study Replication.
    Inj Prev
    2009
    15
    183
    7
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  37. Sorenson
    SB
    ,  
    Vittes
    KA
    .  
    Mental health and firearms in community-based surveys: implications for suicide prevention.
    Eval Rev
    2008
    32
    239
    56
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  38. Hsieh
    JK
    ,  
    Arias
    JJ
    ,  
    Sarmey
    N
    ,  
    Rose
    JA
    ,  
    Tousi
    B
    .  
    Firearms among cognitively impaired persons: a cross-sectional study [Letter].
    Ann Intern Med
    2015
    163
    485
    7
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  39. Spangenberg
    KB
    ,  
    Wagner
    MT
    ,  
    Hendrix
    S
    ,  
    Bachman
    DL
    .  
    Firearm presence in households of patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.
    J Am Geriatr Soc
    1999
    47
    1183
    6
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  40. Elbogen
    EB
    ,  
    Johnson
    SC
    .  
    The intricate link between violence and mental disorder: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.
    Arch Gen Psychiatry
    2009
    66
    152
    61
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  41. Butkus
    R
    ,  
    Weissman
    A
    .  
    Internists' attitudes toward prevention of firearm injury.
    Ann Intern Med
    2014
    160
    821
    7
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  42. Cassel
    CK
    ,  
    Nelson
    EA
    ,  
    Smith
    TW
    ,  
    Schwab
    CW
    ,  
    Barlow
    B
    ,  
    Gary
    NE
    .  
    Internists' and surgeons' attitudes toward guns and firearm injury prevention.
    Ann Intern Med
    1998
    128
    224
    30
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  43. Price
    JH
    ,  
    Thompson
    A
    ,  
    Khubchandani
    J
    ,  
    Wiblishauser
    M
    ,  
    Dowling
    J
    ,  
    Teeple
    K
    .  
    Perceived roles of emergency department physicians regarding anticipatory guidance on firearm safety.
    J Emerg Med
    2013
    44
    1007
    16
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  44. Dowd
    MD
    ,  
    Sege
    RD
    .  
    Council on Injury, Violence, and Poison Prevention Executive Committee
    Firearm-related injuries affecting the pediatric population.
    Pediatrics
    2012
    130
    e1416
    23
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  45. Weinberger
    SE
    ,  
    Hoyt
    DB
    ,  
    Lawrence
    HC
    3rd
    ,  
    Levin
    S
    ,  
    Henley
    DE
    ,  
    Alden
    ER
    .  
    et al
    Firearm-related injury and death in the United States: a call to action from 8 health professional organizations and the American Bar Association.
    Ann Intern Med
    2015
    162
    513
    6
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  46. Price
    JH
    ,  
    Kinnison
    A
    ,  
    Dake
    JA
    ,  
    Thompson
    AJ
    ,  
    Price
    JA
    .  
    Psychiatrists' practices and perceptions regarding anticipatory guidance on firearms.
    Am J Prev Med
    2007
    33
    370
    3
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  47. Betz
    ME
    ,  
    Miller
    M
    ,  
    Barber
    C
    ,  
    Miller
    I
    ,  
    Sullivan
    AF
    ,  
    Camargo
    CA
    Jr
    .  
    et al
    ED-SAFE Investigators
    Lethal means restriction for suicide prevention: beliefs and behaviors of emergency department providers.
    Depress Anxiety
    2013
    30
    1013
    20
    PubMed
    PubMed
  48. Walters
    H
    ,  
    Kulkarni
    M
    ,  
    Forman
    J
    ,  
    Roeder
    K
    ,  
    Travis
    J
    ,  
    Valenstein
    M
    .  
    Feasibility and acceptability of interventions to delay gun access in VA mental health settings.
    Gen Hosp Psychiatry
    2012
    34
    692
    8
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  49. Betz
    ME
    ,  
    Miller
    M
    ,  
    Barber
    C
    ,  
    Beaty
    B
    ,  
    Miller
    I
    ,  
    Camargo
    CA
    Jr
    .  
    et al
    Lethal means access and assessment among suicidal emergency department patients.
    Depress Anxiety.
    2016
    PubMed
  50. Dobscha
    SK
    ,  
    Denneson
    LM
    ,  
    Kovas
    AE
    ,  
    Corson
    K
    ,  
    Helmer
    DA
    ,  
    Bair
    MJ
    .  
    Primary care clinician responses to positive suicidal ideation risk assessments in veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan.
    Gen Hosp Psychiatry
    2014
    36
    310
    7
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  51. Slovak
    K
    ,  
    Brewer
    TW
    ,  
    Carlson
    K
    .  
    Client firearm assessment and safety counseling: the role of social workers.
    Soc Work
    2008
    53
    358
    66
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  52. Pierson
    J
    ,  
    Viera
    AJ
    ,  
    Barnhouse
    KK
    ,  
    Tulsky
    JA
    ,  
    Richman
    BD
    ,  
    Goldstein
    AO
    .  
    Physician attitudes and experience with permit applications for concealed weapons [Letter].
    N Engl J Med
    2014
    370
    2453
    4
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  53. Traylor
    A
    ,  
    Price
    JH
    ,  
    Telljohann
    SK
    ,  
    King
    K
    ,  
    Thompson
    A
    .  
    Clinical psychologists' firearm risk management perceptions and practices.
    J Community Health
    2010
    35
    60
    7
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  54. Slovak
    K
    ,  
    Brewer
    TW
    .  
    Suicide and firearm means restriction: can training make a difference?
    Suicide Life Threat Behav
    2010
    40
    63
    73
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  55. Betz
    ME
    ,  
    Wintemute
    GJ
    .  
    Physician counseling on firearm safety: a new kind of cultural competence.
    JAMA
    2015
    314
    449
    50
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  56. McGee
    KS
    ,  
    Coyne-Beasley
    T
    ,  
    Johnson
    RM
    .  
    Review of evaluations of educational approaches to promote safe storage of firearms.
    Inj Prev
    2003
    9
    108
    11
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  57. Sege
    RD
    ,  
    Hatmaker-Flanigan
    E
    ,  
    DeVos
    E
    ,  
    Levin-Goodman
    R
    ,  
    Spivak
    H
    .  
    Anticipatory guidance and violence prevention: results from family and pediatrician focus groups.
    Pediatrics
    2006
    117
    455
    63
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  58. Paola
    FA
    .  
    Firearm injury prevention [Letter].
    Ann Intern Med
    1998
    129
    336
    7
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  59. Betz
    ME
    ,  
    Flaten
    HK
    ,  
    Miller
    M
    .  
    Older adult openness to physician questioning about firearms [Letter].
    J Am Geriatr Soc
    2015
    63
    2214
    5
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  60. Everett
    SA
    ,  
    Price
    JH
    ,  
    Bedell
    AW
    ,  
    Telljohann
    SK
    .  
    Family practice physicians' firearm safety counseling beliefs and behaviors.
    J Community Health
    1997
    22
    313
    24
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  61. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, 2014. Recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014. Accessed at www.ahrq.gov/professionals/clinicians-providers/guidelines-recommendations/guide/index.html on 12 April 2016.
  62. The Joint Commission. National Patient Safety Goals Effective January 1, 2015. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: The Joint Commission; 2014. Accessed at www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/6/2015_NPSG_HAP.pdf on 12 April 2016.
  63. Barkin
    SL
    ,  
    Finch
    SA
    ,  
    Ip
    EH
    ,  
    Scheindlin
    B
    ,  
    Craig
    JA
    ,  
    Steffes
    J
    .  
    et al
    Is office-based counseling about media use, timeouts, and firearm storage effective? Results from a cluster-randomized, controlled trial.
    Pediatrics
    2008
    122
    e15
    25
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  64. Kruesi
    MJ
    ,  
    Grossman
    J
    ,  
    Pennington
    JM
    ,  
    Woodward
    PJ
    ,  
    Duda
    D
    ,  
    Hirsch
    JG
    .  
    Suicide and violence prevention: parent education in the emergency department.
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
    1999
    38
    250
    5
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  65. Sherman
    ME
    ,  
    Burns
    K
    ,  
    Ignelzi
    J
    ,  
    Raia
    J
    ,  
    Lofton
    V
    ,  
    Toland
    D
    .  
    et al
    Firearms risk management in psychiatric care.
    Psychiatr Serv
    2001
    52
    1057
    61
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  66. Albright
    TL
    ,  
    Burge
    SK
    .  
    Improving firearm storage habits: impact of brief office counseling by family physicians.
    J Am Board Fam Pract
    2003
    16
    40
    6
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  67. Carbone
    PS
    ,  
    Clemens
    CJ
    ,  
    Ball
    TM
    .  
    Effectiveness of gun-safety counseling and a gun lock giveaway in a Hispanic community.
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med
    2005
    159
    1049
    54
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  68. Brent
    DA
    ,  
    Baugher
    M
    ,  
    Birmaher
    B
    ,  
    Kolko
    DJ
    ,  
    Bridge
    J
    .  
    Compliance with recommendations to remove firearms in families participating in a clinical trial for adolescent depression.
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
    2000
    39
    1220
    6
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  69. Runyan
    CW
    ,  
    Becker
    A
    ,  
    Brandspigel
    S
    ,  
    Barber
    C
    ,  
    Trudeau
    A
    ,  
    Novins
    D
    .  
    Lethal means counseling for parents of youth seeking emergency care for suicidality.
    West J Emerg Med
    2016
    17
    8
    14
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  70. Stevens
    MM
    ,  
    Olson
    AL
    ,  
    Gaffney
    CA
    ,  
    Tosteson
    TD
    ,  
    Mott
    LA
    ,  
    Starr
    P
    .  
    A pediatric, practice-based, randomized trial of drinking and smoking prevention and bicycle helmet, gun, and seatbelt safety promotion.
    Pediatrics
    2002
    109
    490
    7
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  71. Johnston
    BD
    ,  
    Rivara
    FP
    ,  
    Droesch
    RM
    ,  
    Dunn
    C
    ,  
    Copass
    MK
    .  
    Behavior change counseling in the emergency department to reduce injury risk: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Pediatrics
    2002
    110
    267
    74
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  72. Grossman
    DC
    ,  
    Cummings
    P
    ,  
    Koepsell
    TD
    ,  
    Marshall
    J
    ,  
    D'Ambrosio
    L
    ,  
    Thompson
    RS
    .  
    et al
    Firearm safety counseling in primary care pediatrics: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Pediatrics
    2000
    106
    22
    6
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  73. Purtle
    J
    ,  
    Dicker
    R
    ,  
    Cooper
    C
    ,  
    Corbin
    T
    ,  
    Greene
    MB
    ,  
    Marks
    A
    .  
    et al
    Hospital-based violence intervention programs save lives and money.
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg
    2013
    75
    331
    3
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  74. Purtle
    J
    ,  
    Rich
    JA
    ,  
    Fein
    JA
    ,  
    James
    T
    ,  
    Corbin
    TJ
    .  
    Hospital-based violence prevention: progress and opportunities.
    Ann Intern Med
    2015
    163
    715
    7
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  75. Zatzick
    D
    ,  
    Russo
    J
    ,  
    Lord
    SP
    ,  
    Varley
    C
    ,  
    Wang
    J
    ,  
    Berliner
    L
    .  
    et al
    Collaborative care intervention targeting violence risk behaviors, substance use, and posttraumatic stress and depressive symptoms in injured adolescents: a randomized clinical trial.
    JAMA Pediatr
    2014
    168
    532
    9
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  76. Shaughnessy
    AF
    ,  
    Cincotta
    JA
    ,  
    Adelman
    A
    .  
    Family practice patients' attitudes toward firearm safety as a preventive medicine issue: a HARNET Study. Harrisburg Area Research Network.
    J Am Board Fam Pract
    1999
    12
    354
    9
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  77. Pinholt
    EM
    ,  
    Mitchell
    JD
    ,  
    Butler
    JH
    ,  
    Kumar
    H
    .  
    “Is there a gun in the home?” Assessing the risks of gun ownership in older adults.
    J Am Geriatr Soc
    2014
    62
    1142
    6
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  78. Lum
    HD
    ,  
    Flaten
    HK
    ,  
    Betz
    ME
    .  
    Gun access and safety practices among older adults.
    Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res
    2016
    2016
    2980416
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  79. Yip
    PS
    ,  
    Caine
    E
    ,  
    Yousuf
    S
    ,  
    Chang
    SS
    ,  
    Wu
    KC
    ,  
    Chen
    YY
    .  
    Means restriction for suicide prevention.
    Lancet
    2012
    379
    2393
    9
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  80. Cal. Penal Code §18100 (2014).
  81. Anglemyer
    A
    ,  
    Horvath
    T
    ,  
    Rutherford
    G
    .  
    The accessibility of firearms and risk for suicide and homicide victimization among household members: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ann Intern Med
    2014
    160
    101
    10
    PubMed
  82. Wintemute
    GJ
    ,  
    Parham
    CA
    ,  
    Beaumont
    JJ
    ,  
    Wright
    M
    ,  
    Drake
    C
    .  
    Mortality among recent purchasers of handguns.
    N Engl J Med
    1999
    341
    1583
    9
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  83. 45 C.F.R. §164.512 (1996).
  84. Rodriguez L. Letter to U.S. Health Care Providers on HIPAA Privacy Rule. 15 July 2013.
  85. Simon
    RI
    .  
    The myth of “imminent” violence in psychiatry and the law.
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev
    2006
    75
    631
    44
  86. Snyder
    L
    .  
    American College of Physicians Ethics, Professionalism, and Human Rights Committee
    American College of Physicians Ethics Manual: sixth edition.
    Ann Intern Med
    2012
    156
    73
    104
    CrossRef
    PubMed
  87. American Medical Association. Opinion 8.082 - Withholding Information from Patients. AMA Code of Medical Ethics. Chicago: American Medical Association; 2006. Accessed at www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/opinion8082.page on 12 February 2016.
  88. Puttagunta
    R
    ,  
    Coverdale
    TR
    ,  
    Coverdale
    J
    .  
    What is taught on firearm safety in undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education? A review of educational programs.
    Acad Psychiatry
    2016
    PubMed
  89. Vriniotis
    M
    ,  
    Barber
    C
    ,  
    Frank
    E
    ,  
    Demicco
    R
    .  
    New Hampshire Firearm Safety Coalition
    A suicide prevention campaign for firearm dealers in New Hampshire.
    Suicide Life Threat Behav
    2015
    45
    157
    63
    PubMed
    CrossRef
    PubMed
This article was published at www.annals.org on 17 May 2016.

Table 1. Language From Relevant Federal and State Statutes*

Table 1. Language From Relevant Federal and State Statutes*

Table 2. Conditions When Firearm Information Might Be Particularly Relevant to the Health of a Patient and Potentially to Others

Table 2. Conditions When Firearm Information Might Be Particularly Relevant to the Health of a Patient and Potentially to Others

Table 3. Materials for Distribution to Patients

Table 3. Materials for Distribution to Patients

Table 4. Firearm Safe Storage Options*

Table 4. Firearm Safe Storage Options*

Table 5. Additional Resources

Table 5. Additional Resources

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

This feature is available only to Registered Users

Subscribe/Learn More
Submit a Comment

2 Comments

Robert B. Sklaroff, M.D.

Nazareth Hospital, Philadelphia PA

August 6, 2016

The Privacy of Physician History-Taking Mustn’t Be Violated, at Gun-Point

Just as was the case two years ago (1), because “public health research predictably guides generation of public policy, it is necessary to scrutinize the political science underlying the paired systematic review (2) and editorial on gun control.” Inasmuch as litigation pends before the SCOTUS, the focus is properly trained on slippery-slope rhetoric subtly embedded in (and omitted from) discussion of what is portrayed as inherent in the patient-physician relationship.

It is suggested that an initial query “might simply be, ‘Are there any firearms kept in or around your home?’ (2).” No, the topic should be gently introduced just as is accomplished with other concerns such as tobacco-use, namely, “Would you like to discuss….?” Non-pejorative phrasing is welcoming without being intrusive; the more aggressive approach “simply” may trigger communication cessation and, thus, preclude invoking the presumed motivations for such questioning, education and counseling.

In addition, “profiling” of demographic groups allegedly carrying increased-risk for violence includes citation of a generic CDC-website to support the claim that middle-aged and older white men are “at high risk for firearm-related suicide (up to 5 times higher than black men of the same age).” Yet, the specific article addressing this topic included a graph that depicts a three-fold increase (3) and another article covering the same decade (1999-2008) reported a datum that was ignored: “Among racial/ethnic groups, the greatest increases in suicide rates were among white non-Hispanics (40 percent) and American Indian and Alaska Natives (65 percent)” (4). Targeting millions of Caucasian males is unjustified.

Not surprisingly, an article published last year that conveyed opinions consistent with those being promulgated was cited uncritically, failing to refute the referenced-claim in an accompanying letter that the “onslaught of ‘scientific’ support for gun-control laws is flawed” (5). The abstract even admitted specific recommendations were generated by “proceeding from the limited available evidence.” Such abuse of academic discretion—having bipartisan roots—is more ideological than definitive; it poisons what should be disinterested inquiry devoid of subliminal messaging.

Finally, the title (“Yes, you can…”) was overtly reminiscent of the political campaign of the incumbent president, seemingly at-one with the big-government themes that have been emblematic since 2009. Polemics have no place in the composition of scholarly articles; paradoxically, their suasive capacity is diminished as a result.

Clinical interactions must uphold patient-physician privacy-rights and be untethered from mandates, both regarding history-taking and how it is recorded.







References

1. Sklaroff, RB. Guns, Suicide, and Homicide [Letter]. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(12):876-877. doi:10.7326/L14-5012-2

2. Wintemute GJ, Betz MD, Ranney ML. Yes, you can: physicians, patients and firearms. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165:205-213. Doi:10.7326/M15-2905

3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. QuickStats: Death Rates from Suicide* for Persons Aged 45–64 Years, by Black or White Race and Sex — United States, 1999–2008. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) 61(01);21 (January 13, 2012). Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6101a6.htm on 5 August 2016.

4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC finds suicide rates among middle-aged adults increased from 1999-2010. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014. [Press Release]. Accessed at http://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2013/p0502-suicide-rates.html on 5 August 2016.

5. Sklaroff, RB. Onslaught of "Scientific" Support for Gun-Control Laws is Flawed [Letter]. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(7):513-516. doi:10.7326/M15-0337. Accessed at http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2151828 on 5 August 2016.


Garen J. Wintemute, MD, MPH; Marian E. Betz, MD, MPH; Megan L. Ranney, MD, MPH

University of California, Davis; University of Colorado; Brown University

September 30, 2016

Physicians, Patients, and Firearms: In Response to Dr. Sklaroff

September 29, 2016

To the Editor:

Dr. Sklaroff (1) suggests that we advocate asking about firearms without any prior effort to establish either the need for such questions from the physician’s perspective or their reasonableness from point of view of the patient. He is incorrect. We discuss these preliminaries in our article (2) and elsewhere (3) and use that approach in our clinical work. We wholeheartedly agree with the importance of non-pejorative phrasing—again, a point we have made repeatedly. Perhaps he sees something pejorative in “Are there any firearms kept in or around your home?” We do not.
We take issue with his use of the loaded term “profiling” to describe making an initial and tentative assessment of an individual patient’s risk for an adverse health event based in part on characteristics that patient shares with others. Physicians adopt this approach all the time—of necessity—are aware of its limitations, and ask questions precisely to refine and individualize those initial assessments. Middle-aged and older white, non-Hispanic males are a prime example. Firearm suicide risk in that large group is high and increasing; to a surprising extent, firearm violence is now an old white guy problem (4). Does that high risk apply to every member of the group? Of course it doesn’t. Does it provide sufficient basis for further inquiry, particularly when other risk factors are involved? We believe it does.
Our choice of a title came from the circumstances that led to the writing of the article itself. In recent years we have given presentations on firearm violence at national meetings of medical professional societies and have repeatedly been asked whether it was even permissible under the law for physicians to ask patients about firearms. The first draft of the article focused primarily on a discussion of state and federal laws on this matter, and the title was chosen to summarize our answer to that repeated question. As both our article and this response to Dr. Sklaroff should make clear, we agree entirely with him that physician-patient relationships should be “untethered from mandates.” This includes mandates that would restrict the free exchange of ideas and information about firearms.

REFERENCES

1. Sklaroff RB. The privacy of physician history-taking mustn’t be violated, at gun-point. Ann Int Med. 2016 Aug 6. Available at annals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2522436.
2. Wintemute GJ, Betz MD, Ranney ML. Yes, you can: physicians, patients and firearms. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165:205-213.
3. Betz ME, Wintemute GJ. Physician counseling on firearm safety: a new kind of cultural competence. JAMA. 2015;314:449-450.
4. Wintemute GJ. The epidemiology of firearm violence in the twenty-first century United States. Ann Rev Public Health. 2015;36:5-19.

PDF
Not Available
Citations
Citation

Wintemute GJ, Betz ME, Ranney ML. Yes, You Can: Physicians, Patients, and Firearms. Ann Intern Med. ;165:205–213. doi: 10.7326/M15-2905

Download citation file:

  • Ris (Zotero)
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • Medlars
  • ProCite
  • RefWorks
  • Reference Manager

© 2019

×
Permissions

Published: Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(3):205-213.

DOI: 10.7326/M15-2905

Published at www.annals.org on 17 May 2016

©
2016 American College of Physicians
35 Citations

See Also

Curbing Firearm Violence: Identifying a Specific Target for Physician Action
Physicians, Patients, and Firearms
Physicians, Patients, and Firearms
View MoreView Less

Related Articles

Reducing Firearm Injuries and Deaths in the United States: A Position Paper From the American College of Physicians
Annals of Internal Medicine; 169 (10): 704-707
State Intimate Partner Violence–Related Firearm Laws and Intimate Partner Homicide Rates in the United States, 1991 to 2015
Annals of Internal Medicine; 167 (8): 536-543
Firearm Surrender Laws: Prompting Promise for Women's Health
Annals of Internal Medicine; 167 (8): 591-592
The Tragic Events of April 1996
Annals of Internal Medicine; 132 (11): 911-913
View MoreView Less

Related Topics

Emergency Medicine
Healthcare Delivery and Policy
Hospital Medicine
Tobacco, Alcohol, and Other Substance Abuse

Emergency Medicine, Healthcare Delivery and Policy, Hospital Medicine, Tobacco, Alcohol, and Other Substance Abuse.

PubMed Articles

Dangerous weapons or dangerous people? The temporal associations between gun violence and mental health.
Prev Med 2019.
What's Unique About Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Youth and Young Adult Suicides? Findings From the National Violent Death Reporting System.
J Adolesc Health 2019.
View More

Results provided by: PubMed

CME/MOC Activity Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
The Comments Feature Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
link to top

Content

  • Home
  • Latest
  • Issues
  • Channels
  • CME/MOC
  • In the Clinic
  • Journal Club
  • Web Exclusives

Information For

  • Author Info
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Readers
  • Institutions / Libraries / Agencies
  • Advertisers

Services

  • Subscribe
  • Renew
  • Alerts
  • Current Issue RSS
  • Latest RSS
  • In the Clinic RSS
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • Help
  • About Annals
  • About Mobile
  • Patient Information
  • Teaching Tools
  • Annals in the News
  • Share Your Feedback

Awards and Cover

  • Personae (Cover Photo)
  • Junior Investigator Awards
  • Poetry Prize

Other Resources

  • ACP Online
  • Career Connection
  • ACP Advocate Blog
  • ACP Journal Wise

Follow Annals On

  • Twitter Link
  • Facebook Link
acp link acp
silverchair link silverchair

Copyright © 2019 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704

Privacy Policy

|

Conditions of Use

This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. | Accept
×

You need a subscription to this content to use this feature.

×
PDF Downloads Require Access to the Full Article.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN
Open Athens|Shibboleth|Log In
Annals of Internal Medicine
PURCHASE OPTIONS
Buy This Article|Subscribe
You will be redirected to acponline.org to sign-in to Annals to complete your purchase.
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
Access to this Free Content Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In. Please Choose One of the Following Options
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×