Skip Navigation
American College of Physicians Logo
  • Subscribe
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Sign In
    Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
    INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
    Sign In|Set Up Account
    You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
    INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN
    Open Athens|Shibboleth|Log In
    Annals of Internal Medicine
    SUBSCRIBE
    Subscribe to Annals of Internal Medicine.
    You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your purchase.
Annals of Internal Medicine Logo Menu
  • Latest
  • Issues
  • Channels
  • CME/MOC
  • In the Clinic
  • Journal Club
  • Web Exclusives
  • Author Info
Advanced Search
  • ‹ PREV ARTICLE
  • This Issue
  • NEXT ARTICLE ›
Ideas and Opinions |6 June 2017

The Importance of International Medical Graduates in the United States Free

William W. Pinsky, MD

William W. Pinsky, MD
From Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Article, Author, and Disclosure Information
Author, Article, and Disclosure Information
This article was published at Annals.org on 7 March 2017.
  • From Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

    Disclosures: Author has disclosed no conflicts of interest. Forms can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M17-0505.

    Requests for Single Reprints: William W. Pinsky, MD, Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates, 3624 Market Street, 4th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19104; e-mail, wpinsky@ecfmg.org.

    Author Contributions: Conception and design: W.W. Pinsky.

    Analysis and interpretation of the data: W.W. Pinsky.

    Drafting of the article: W.W. Pinsky.

    Critical revision for important intellectual content: W.W. Pinsky.

    Final approval of the article: W.W. Pinsky.

    Collection and assembly of data: W.W. Pinsky.

×
  • ‹ PREV ARTICLE
  • This Issue
  • NEXT ARTICLE ›
Jump To
  • Full Article
  • FULL ARTICLE
  • FULL ARTICLE
      1. References
  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplements
  • Audio/Video
  • Summary for Patients
  • Clinical Slide Sets
  • CME / MOC
  • Comments
  • Twitter Link
  • Facebook Link
  • Email Link
More
  • LinkedIn Link
The future supply of physicians in the United States will not be adequate to meet the country's health care needs. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act has made significant progress in offering health care to the previously uninsured (1). In doing so, however, it has highlighted access issues and uncovered the need for a larger health care workforce. Although the number of U.S. medical schools has increased recently and many established programs have expanded enrollment, the workforce has not yet been augmented substantially, because the education cycle of fully trained practitioners takes many years. For decades, internationally educated physicians have come to the United States to complete their training. In addition to caring for patients across the United States during their training, many of these physicians stay in the country permanently and enter the U.S. health care workforce. Internationally educated physicians currently account for approximately one fourth of the practicing physician workforce and will continue to play a critical role in the delivery of health care services (2). Any disruption to this flow of international medical graduates (IMGs) will have a negative effect on patient care. This commentary discusses the current vetting process for IMGs and outlines the importance of these physicians in delivering quality health care in the United States and their subsequent contribution to the country's safety.
To be eligible to enter accredited U.S. graduate medical education (GME) programs, IMGs first must be certified by the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG). The vetting procedure, which includes the primary source verification of medical school credentials and requires the candidate to pass the first 2 steps of the U.S. Medical Licensing Examination, is quite rigorous. The entire process, from initial application to certification, takes an average of 3 years to complete. Historically, just over 60% of applicants who take an examination required for ECFMG certification complete the certfication process. Only those who are qualified and truly committed to obtaining GME training in the United States attain ECFMG certification. Even then, obtaining a GME position is not guaranteed. During the past 5 years, the ECFMG certified approximately 10 000 IMGs per year. In 2016, only 6638 (51.9%) of 12 790 IMGs participating in the National Resident Matching Program were placed in first-year positions (3). Without GME training (at least 3 years in most jurisdictions), an IMG is not eligible to obtain an unrestricted license to practice medicine in the United States. The ECFMG certification process, combined with the competitive nature of residency selection and strict state licensure rules, ensures that only high-quality, carefully screened IMGs enter the U.S. workforce.
International medical graduates come to the United States for many reasons, including the desire to engage in care that may not be available in their home countries because of resource constraints. Except for U.S. citizens and permanent residents, IMGs who seek entry into the United States for GME must obtain a visa that permits clinical training to provide medical services. Although several visa types are available (such as the H-1B for temporary workers in specialty occupations), one of the most common types for IMGs is the J-1 visa. The ECFMG is authorized by the U.S. Department of State to sponsor foreign national physicians for the J-1 visa. In addition to having a valid ECFMG certificate and meeting other eligibility criteria (4), a J-1 visa holder is required, upon completion of U.S. training, to return to his or her home country for 2 years to transmit the knowledge he or she gained in the United States. Although pathways exist for staying in the United States after training (J-1 visa waivers are available for service in underserved areas), changes in immigration policy might limit bilateral knowledge transfer between the United States and other countries. From a global education perspective, these restrictions also might diminish the perceived benefit of U.S.-based GME and encourage highly educated medical school graduates to seek postgraduate opportunities elsewhere.
Published studies suggest that patient outcomes are at least equivalent, if not better, for persons treated by IMGs (5). Investigations also have shown that physician–patient concordance based on ethnicity, languages spoken, and other demographic variables improves access to care for underserved minorities (6). Because the U.S. patient population is becoming more heterogeneous, having a diverse provider workforce is logical (7). In 2016, the ECFMG issued certificates to citizens of 154 countries. In addition to providing high-quality care, IMGs add much-needed diversity to the U.S. physician workforce.
According to the 2016 American Medical Association Physician Masterfile, 897 783 physicians are practicing in the United States, 206 030 (23%) of whom did not graduate from a U.S. or Canadian medical school. Nearly 30 000 IMG residents are currently in training, representing almost one fourth of all trainees. Although IMGs enter many different specialties, internal medicine is by far the most common. In 2016, on the basis of self-designated practice specialty, approximately 25% of all active physicians in the United States were internists. Within this group (n = 226 183), 36% (n = 81 456) were IMGs. If the role of IMGs in U.S. health care diminishes, IMG-dependent internal medicine programs, including subspecialty fellowships, likely will be the most affected.
During the past decade, calls have been made for the United States to train its own physicians and stop relying on economically underdeveloped nations to augment the workforce (8). From the perspectives of both “brain drain” and workforce cost to underdeveloped nations, this discussion has persisted. However, from a policy perspective, the pathway to self-sufficiency is not that clear. Many international medical schools purposefully educate physicians for foreign markets. From the workforce perspective of the nation to which they immigrate, they may be considered to represent “brain gain.” Finally, although many efforts have been made to encourage U.S. medical students to enter primary care disciplines or to practice in rural or remote areas of the country, their success has been supported by the results of relatively small-scale studies (9). Therefore, IMGs still tend to fill the practice gaps left by U.S. graduates (10). If the proportion of IMGs decreases in the future and U.S. graduates, regardless of increases in their numbers, do not choose careers in certain specialties or practice in underserved areas, patient care may suffer.
The future composition of the U.S. physician workforce clearly will depend on IMGs. Because access to health care depends on an adequate supply of high-quality practitioners, preserving the ability of IMGs to compete for training positions in the United States is extremely important.

References

  1. Obama
    BH
    .  
    Repealing the ACA without a replacement—the risks to American health care.
    N Engl J Med
    2017
    376
    297
    9
     PubMed
    CrossRef
     PubMed
  2. Mullan
    F
    ,  
    Salsberg
    E
    ,  
    Weider
    K
    .  
    Why a GME squeeze is unlikely.
    N Engl J Med
    2015
    373
    2397
    9
     PubMed
    CrossRef
     PubMed
  3. National Resident Matching Program
    Results and Data: 2016 Main Residency Match.
    Washington, DC
    National Resident Matching Program
    2016
  4. Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates. ECFMG certification fact sheet. Accessed at www.ecfmg.org/forms/certfact.pdf on 21 February 2017.
  5. Norcini
    JJ
    ,  
    Boulet
    JR
    ,  
    Dauphinee
    WD
    ,  
    Opalek
    A
    ,  
    Krantz
    ID
    ,  
    Anderson
    ST
    .  
    Evaluating the quality of care provided by graduates of international medical schools.
    Health Aff (Millwood)
    2010
    29
    1461
    8
     PubMed
    CrossRef
     PubMed
  6. American College of Physicians
    The Role of International Medical Graduates in the U.S. Physician Workforce.
    Philadelphia
    American Coll Physicians
    2005
  7. Norcini
    JJ
    ,  
    vanZanten
    M
    ,  
    Boulet
    JR
    .  
    The contribution of international medical graduates to diversity in the U.S. physician workforce: graduate medical education.
    J Health Care Poor Underserved
    2008
    19
    493
    9
     PubMed
    CrossRef
     PubMed
  8. Mandel
    J
    .  
    Counterpoint: should the United States provide postgraduate training to international medical graduates? No [Editorial].
    Chest
    2016
    149
    895
    7
     PubMed
    CrossRef
     PubMed
  9. Rabinowitz
    HK
    ,  
    Petterson
    S
    ,  
    Boulger
    JG
    ,  
    Hunsaker
    ML
    ,  
    Diamond
    JJ
    ,  
    Markham
    FW
    ,  
    et al
    Medical school rural programs: a comparison with international medical graduates in addressing state-level rural family physician and primary care supply.
    Acad Med
    2012
    87
    488
    92
     PubMed
    CrossRef
     PubMed
  10. Hing
    E
    ,  
    Lin
    S
    .  
    Role of international medical graduates providing office-based medical care: United States, 2005–2006. NCHS data brief no 13.
    Hyattsville, MD
    National Center for Health Statistics
    2009

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

This feature is available only to Registered Users

Subscribe/Learn More
Submit a Comment

1 Comment

Russell Bell

none

June 13, 2017

IMGs working in the US

The US has more physicians than any other country. Physicians who leave their home countries to work in the US cost the health of their home countries more than they contribute to the health of Americans.

PDF
Not Available
Citations
Citation

Pinsky WW. The Importance of International Medical Graduates in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166:840–841. [Epub ahead of print 7 March 2017]. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/M17-0505

Download citation file:

  • Ris (Zotero)
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • Medlars
  • ProCite
  • RefWorks
  • Reference Manager

© 2019

×
Permissions

Published: Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(11):840-841.

DOI: 10.7326/M17-0505

Published at www.annals.org on 7 March 2017

©
2017 American College of Physicians
9 Citations

Related Articles

U.S. Immigration Policy and American Medical Research: The Scientific Contributions of Foreign Medical Graduates
Annals of Internal Medicine; 167 (8): 584-586
Do Integrated Medical Groups Provide Higher-Quality Medical Care than Individual Practice Associations?
Annals of Internal Medicine; 145 (11): 826-833
U.S. Needs More Physicians Soon, but How Many More Is Debatable
Annals of Internal Medicine; 143 (6): 469-472
Workforce Reform, International Medical Graduates, and the In-Training Examination
Annals of Internal Medicine; 126 (10): 803-805
View MoreView Less

Related Topics

Education and Training

Education and Training.

PubMed Articles

Recent developments in undergraduate education in psychiatry in Japan.
Int Rev Psychiatry 2019.
[INTERVENTIONS TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF THE INTERNSHIP YEAR].
Harefuah 2019;158(10):630-634.
View More

Results provided by: PubMed

CME/MOC Activity Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
The Comments Feature Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
link to top

Content

  • Home
  • Latest
  • Issues
  • Channels
  • CME/MOC
  • In the Clinic
  • Journal Club
  • Web Exclusives

Information For

  • Author Info
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Readers
  • Institutions / Libraries / Agencies
  • Advertisers

Services

  • Subscribe
  • Renew
  • Alerts
  • Current Issue RSS
  • Latest RSS
  • In the Clinic RSS
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • Help
  • About Annals
  • About Mobile
  • Patient Information
  • Teaching Tools
  • Annals in the News
  • Share Your Feedback

Awards and Cover

  • Personae (Cover Photo)
  • Junior Investigator Awards
  • Poetry Prize

Other Resources

  • ACP Online
  • Career Connection
  • ACP Advocate Blog
  • ACP Journal Wise

Follow Annals On

  • Twitter Link
  • Facebook Link
acp link acp
silverchair link silverchair

Copyright © 2019 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704

Privacy Policy

|

Conditions of Use

This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. | Accept
×

You need a subscription to this content to use this feature.

×
PDF Downloads Require Access to the Full Article.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN
Open Athens|Shibboleth|Log In
Annals of Internal Medicine
PURCHASE OPTIONS
Buy This Article|Subscribe
You will be redirected to acponline.org to sign-in to Annals to complete your purchase.
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
Access to this Free Content Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In. Please Choose One of the Following Options
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×