Skip Navigation
American College of Physicians Logo
  • Subscribe
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Sign In
    Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
    INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
    Sign In|Set Up Account
    You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
    INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN
    Open Athens|Shibboleth|Log In
    Annals of Internal Medicine
    SUBSCRIBE
    Subscribe to Annals of Internal Medicine.
    You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your purchase.
Annals of Internal Medicine Logo Menu
  • Latest
  • Issues
  • Channels
  • CME/MOC
  • In the Clinic
  • Journal Club
  • Web Exclusives
  • Author Info
Advanced Search
  • ‹ PREV ARTICLE
  • This Issue
  • NEXT ARTICLE ›
Summaries for Patients |3 April 2018

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Education for Chronic Pain Free

Article, Author, and Disclosure Information
Author, Article, and Disclosure Information
This article was published at Annals.org on 27 February 2018.
  • The full report is titled “Literacy-Adapted Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Education for Chronic Pain at Low-Income Clinics. A Randomized Controlled Trial.” The authors are B.E. Thorn, J.C. Eyer, B.P. Van Dyke, C.A. Torres, J.W. Burns, M. Kim, A.K. Newman, L.C. Campbell, B. Anderson, P.R. Block, B.J. Bobrow, R. Brooks, T.T. Burton, J.S. Cheavens, C.M. DeMonte, W.D. DeMonte, C.S. Edwards, M. Jeong, M.M. Mulla, T. Penn, L.J. Smith, and D.H. Tucker.


Summaries for Patients are a service provided by Annals to help patients better understand the complicated and often mystifying language of modern medicine.
Summaries for Patients are presented for informational purposes only. These summaries are not a substitute for advice from your own medical provider. If you have questions about this material, or need medical advice about your own health or situation, please contact your physician. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the American College of Physicians.
×
  • ‹ PREV ARTICLE
  • This Issue
  • NEXT ARTICLE ›
Jump To
  • Full Article
  • FULL ARTICLE
  • FULL ARTICLE
    • What is the problem and what is known about it so far?
    • Why did the researchers do this particular study?
    • Who was studied?
    • How was the study done?
    • What did the researchers find?
    • What were the limitations of the study?
    • What are the implications of the study?
  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplements
  • Audio/Video
  • Summary for Patients
  • Clinical Slide Sets
  • CME / MOC
  • Comments
  • Twitter Link
  • Facebook Link
  • Email Link
More
  • LinkedIn Link

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

Chronic pain is a common problem that affects many people who have a low income or are members of minority groups. It is difficult to treat. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a form of psychotherapy that teaches people how thoughts, feelings, physical sensations (such as pain), and behaviors are connected, as well as coping skills to help them feel better. Although CBT has been shown to be effective in treating pain, low-income patients with pain may have problems getting this therapy. Furthermore, trials of CBT have not been done with patients from low-income communities.

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

The researchers wanted to compare the effects of CBT, a pain education (EDU) program, and usual care on pain levels in patients who have chronic pain.

Who was studied?

290 adults with chronic pain symptoms. Most had an income at or below the poverty level, and about one third had a reading level below fifth grade. Many participants were taking opioids at the beginning of the study.

How was the study done?

The study participants were randomly assigned to receive CBT, EDU, or usual care. The researchers developed the CBT and EDU programs for adults with limited reading ability. The participants who were assigned to the CBT and EDU programs attended group sessions held once a week for 10 weeks. Participants in all 3 groups answered questionnaires about their pain levels and physical functioning at baseline, 10 weeks, and 6 months.

What did the researchers find?

After the 10 weeks, participants in the CBT and EDU groups had a greater decrease in their pain levels than those in the usual care group, which did not show much change over time. The EDU group still had improved pain levels at 6 months, but the CBT group did not. Both the CBT and EDU groups showed greater improvement in physical functioning than the usual care group at 10 weeks and at 6 months.

What were the limitations of the study?

The researchers could not tell whether the CBT or EDU program resulted in a change in the amount of opioids used by the participants.

What are the implications of the study?

CBT and EDU programs that were simplified for reading ability resulted in improved pain and physical functioning in patients with chronic pain.

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

This feature is available only to Registered Users

Subscribe/Learn More
Submit a Comment

0 Comments

PDF
Not Available
Citations
Citation

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Education for Chronic Pain. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168:I–22. [Epub ahead of print 27 February 2018]. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/P18-0001

Download citation file:

  • Ris (Zotero)
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • Medlars
  • ProCite
  • RefWorks
  • Reference Manager

© 2019

×
Permissions

Published: Ann Intern Med. 2018;168(7):I-22.

DOI: 10.7326/P18-0001

Published at www.annals.org on 27 February 2018

©
2018 American College of Physicians
0 Citations

See Also

Literacy-Adapted Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Education for Chronic Pain at Low-Income Clinics: A Randomized Controlled Trial
View MoreView Less

Related Articles

Literacy-Adapted Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Education for Chronic Pain at Low-Income Clinics: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Annals of Internal Medicine; 168 (7): 471-480
Chronic Pain Among Suicide Decedents, 2003 to 2014: Findings From the National Violent Death Reporting System
Annals of Internal Medicine; 169 (7): 448-455
The Effects of Cannabis Among Adults With Chronic Pain and an Overview of General Harms: A Systematic Review
Annals of Internal Medicine; 167 (5): 319-331
Annals for Educators - 5 September 2017
Annals of Internal Medicine; 167 (5): ED5
View MoreView Less

Journal Club

Telephone-based CBT reduced insomnia severity more than menopause education in menopausal women
Annals of Internal Medicine; 165 (6): JC30
Use of long-acting, vs short-acting, opioids for chronic pain was linked to unintentional overdose
Annals of Internal Medicine; 163 (2): JC11
In uncontrolled type 2 diabetes, CBT improved glycemic control and reduced depression
Annals of Internal Medicine; 161 (4): JC3
In treatment-resistant depression, adding cognitive–behavioral therapy to usual care was cost-effective at 1 y
Annals of Internal Medicine; 160 (12): JC13
View MoreView Less

PubMed Articles

The use of free fibula-flexor hallucis longus osteomuscular flap for calcaneal reconstruction after partial calcanectomy for the chronic osteomyelitis: A case report.
Int J Surg Case Rep 2019;
Establishing the dose of memory support to improve patient memory for treatment and treatment outcome.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2019;
View More

Results provided by: PubMed

CME/MOC Activity Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
The Comments Feature Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
link to top

Content

  • Home
  • Latest
  • Issues
  • Channels
  • CME/MOC
  • In the Clinic
  • Journal Club
  • Web Exclusives

Information For

  • Author Info
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Readers
  • Institutions / Libraries / Agencies
  • Advertisers

Services

  • Subscribe
  • Renew
  • Alerts
  • Current Issue RSS
  • Latest RSS
  • In the Clinic RSS
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • Help
  • About Annals
  • About Mobile
  • Patient Information
  • Teaching Tools
  • Annals in the News
  • Share Your Feedback

Awards and Cover

  • Personae (Cover Photo)
  • Junior Investigator Awards
  • Poetry Prize

Other Resources

  • ACP Online
  • Career Connection
  • ACP Advocate Blog
  • ACP Journal Wise

Follow Annals On

  • Twitter Link
  • Facebook Link
acp link acp
silverchair link silverchair

Copyright © 2019 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704

Privacy Policy

|

Conditions of Use

This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. | Accept
×

You need a subscription to this content to use this feature.

×
PDF Downloads Require Access to the Full Article.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN
Open Athens|Shibboleth|Log In
Annals of Internal Medicine
PURCHASE OPTIONS
Buy This Article|Subscribe
You will be redirected to acponline.org to sign-in to Annals to complete your purchase.
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
Access to this Free Content Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In. Please Choose One of the Following Options
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×