David H. Wesorick, MD; Vineet Chopra, MD, MSc
Disclosures: Dr. Chopra reports grants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Dr. Wesorick has disclosed no conflicts of interest. Forms can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M16-1400.
One of the original tenets of the management of neutropenic fever—the prompt initiation of broad spectrum, intravenous antibiotics at the first sign of fever in a neutropenic patient—still holds true today.
Low-risk patients (<7 days of neutropenia) can be treated with oral antibiotics in an ambulatory setting after an initial dose given in the hospital or emergency department.
Given the limitations in the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections, empirical antifungal therapy is still recommended for high-risk patients who remain febrile and neutropenic after 4 to 7 days of antibiotic treatment.
A Web-based decision aid did not improve understanding of the patients' prognosis or affect decision making in this group of surrogate decision makers.
The decision aid did increase surrogate awareness of the clinicians' estimates of 1-year survival, but did not alter the surrogates' own estimates. In addition, surrogates often chose care that was more aggressive than their own self-reported understanding of the patients' wishes. The authors hypothesize that these decisions may be driven by emotion as opposed to reason.
An editorial highlights the remarkable finding of this study—that providing surrogates with additional information does not seem to improve decision making. The editorialists suggest that more research is needed to understand why even informed surrogates cling to overly optimistic prognostic beliefs, and make decisions that seem to be at odds with the patients' wishes.
The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.
Wesorick DH, Chopra V. Annals for Hospitalists - 19 March 2019. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170:HO1. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/AWHO201903190
Download citation file:
Published: Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(6):HO1.
Biliary Disorders, Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Hospital Medicine.
Results provided by:
Copyright © 2019 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704
Conditions of Use