Skip Navigation
American College of Physicians Logo
  • Subscribe
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Sign In
    Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
    INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
    Sign In|Set Up Account
    You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
    INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN
    Open Athens|Shibboleth|Log In
    Annals of Internal Medicine
    SUBSCRIBE
    Subscribe to Annals of Internal Medicine.
    You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your purchase.
Annals of Internal Medicine Logo Menu
  • Latest
  • Issues
  • Channels
  • CME/MOC
  • In the Clinic
  • Journal Club
  • Web Exclusives
  • Author Info
Advanced Search
  • ‹ PREV ARTICLE
  • This Issue
  • NEXT ARTICLE ›
Quality Indicators for Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders |16 October 2001

Quality Indicators for Pain Management in Vulnerable Elders Free

Joshua Chodosh, MD, MSHS; Bruce A. Ferrell, MD; Paul G. Shekelle, MD, PhD; Neil S. Wenger, MD, MPH

Joshua Chodosh, MD, MSHS

Bruce A. Ferrell, MD

Paul G. Shekelle, MD, PhD

Neil S. Wenger, MD, MPH

Article, Author, and Disclosure Information
Author, Article, and Disclosure Information
Copyright ©2004 by the American College of Physicians
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Paul Shekelle, MD, PhD, for guidance in the development of this paper and Patricia Smith for technical assistance.
Grant Support: By a contract from Pfizer Inc. to RAND. Dr. Chodosh was a Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholar during the study.
Requests for Single Reprints: Joshua Chodosh, MD, MSHS, Division of Geriatrics, University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095; e-mail, jchodosh@mednet.ucla.edu.
Current Author Addresses: Drs. Chodosh and Ferrell: Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1687.
Dr. Shekelle: RAND, 1700 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138.
Dr. Wenger: Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California, Los Angeles, 911 Broxton Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1736.
  • From the University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; RAND Health, Santa Monica, California; and the Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.
×
  • ‹ PREV ARTICLE
  • This Issue
  • NEXT ARTICLE ›
Jump To
  • Full Article
  • FULL ARTICLE
  • FULL ARTICLE
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
      1. References
  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplements
  • Audio/Video
  • Summary for Patients
  • Clinical Slide Sets
  • CME / MOC
  • Comments
  • Twitter Link
  • Facebook Link
  • Email Link
More
  • LinkedIn Link
Pain occurs frequently with disease and is prevalent in older people. Population-based studies suggest that 25% to 40% of community-dwelling elders have pain-related problems (1). Studies have reported as high as a twofold increase in painful conditions in persons older than 60 years of age relative to younger persons (1). The prevalence is even greater among residents of long-term care facilities, where as many as 71% to 83% of residents have at least one pain-associated problem (2, 3). The consequences and costs of pain in elderly persons are substantial. The association of pain with depression (2–7), social isolation (2, 4), sleep disturbance (2, 4), gait impairment (2, 4), and increased use of health services with their attendant costs (4) is well documented.
Chronic pain means different things to different patients and physicians. For the purposes of this review, chronic pain is defined as “persistent or episodic pain of a duration or intensity that adversely affects the function or well-being of the patient” (8). Although pharmacologic treatment with traditional analgesics is the most common form of pain treatment in older patients (2–4, 9), the use of complementary and alternative medications and nonpharmacologic interventions also must be considered, especially when results with the former are felt to be less than satisfactory or the burden of potential adverse effects outweighs the benefits (4, 9). While patients desire relief of symptoms, complete relief for patients with chronic pain is often unobtainable, and treatment decisions require that patients and physicians continually weigh the risks against the benefits (4).
This review describes quality indicators developed to measure the quality of care associated with chronic pain management in vulnerable elders. These indicators do not pertain to management of cancer pain or treatment of pain that is acute in nature.
Although few experts disagree that painful conditions should be treated, less consensus exists on specific treatments for particular conditions. For this reason, indicators have been proposed for the general management of chronic pain in areas in which evidence is strong or a consensus among experts exists. For the following reasons, indicators for specific pharmacologic therapies for specific conditions were not proposed: 1) highly prevalent conditions, such as osteoarthritis, with good evidence for specific therapies are addressed elsewhere; 2) for most painful conditions, definitive evidence favoring one pain therapy over another is lacking; and 3) because the information physicians need to make optimal therapeutic decisions is complex, implementation of indicators to measure the quality of such decisions on the basis of medical records or patient perceptions is problematic. This review focuses on screening, general management, and follow-up of chronic painful conditions and identifies indicators that may be applied to the evaluation of quality of care for vulnerable elders with chronic pain.

Methods

The methods for developing these quality indicators, including literature review and expert panel consideration, are detailed elsewhere (10). For pain management, the structured literature review identified 7297 titles, from which relevant abstracts and articles were identified. On the basis of the literature and the authors' expertise, 16 potential quality indicators were proposed.

Results

Of the 16 potential quality indicators for management of chronic pain, 6 were judged to be valid by the expert panel process, and one new indicator was created by the panel (see the quality indicators); 2 were merged into indicators in other sections, and 8 were rejected. We describe the literature summaries that support each of the indicators judged to be valid by the expert panel process.

Quality Indicators 1 and 2

Screening for Chronic Pain at New-Patient Visits

ALL vulnerable elders should be screened for chronic pain during the initial evaluation period BECAUSE older people commonly have pain that goes unrecognized by health care providers.

Regular Screening for Chronic Pain

ALL vulnerable elders should be screened for chronic pain every 2 years BECAUSE older people commonly have pain that goes unrecognized by health care providers.
Supporting Evidence. Population-based studies demonstrate that persons with chronic pain are predominantly elderly and that older persons are at risk for undertreatment of pain. A systematic literature review found eight population-based surveys (four U.S. [5, 9, 11, 12] and four international [1, 13–15] surveys) documenting that persons with chronic pain are predominantly older. In these studies, pain was typically undertreated. In a random survey of 500 households in Ontario, Canada, 25% to 40% of community-dwelling persons older than 60 years of age were found to have chronic pain; this was twice the prevalence found among a group of younger persons (1). A 1997 telephone survey (9) found that 18% of older Americans used analgesic medications several times per week, and more than half had taken prescription pain medications for more than 6 months. From a diagnostic perspective, arthritis is known to affect up to 80% of persons older than 65 years of age, and a substantial proportion of this group experiences significant pain (16). The Epidemiologic Follow-up Study (5) to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey showed that pain was of musculoskeletal origin in 33% of persons with pain. Among persons with chronic pain (age range, 32 to 86 years), those older than 65 years of age (27%) composed the largest group (5).
The degree to which older persons under-report pain symptoms is difficult to establish, but consensus opinion suggests that under-reporting is common (4). One study that addressed this issue (2), albeit indirectly, found that 55 of 65 residents with pain (85%) in a long-term care facility had not received analgesic medication in the preceding 24 hours. These persons provided several reasons for not requesting medication, such as not wanting to bother the nurses. This finding suggests the presence of significant barriers to the unsolicited reporting of pain.
Although no studies have reported the prevalence of inadequately treated noncancer pain in ambulatory elders, studies of nursing home residents and patients with cancer have reported that a substantial proportion of patients receive inadequate treatment of pain. The prevalence of inadequately treated pain was assessed in a retrospective cohort study of 1492 nursing homes that participated in a demonstration project of the Health Care Financing Administration (17). Bernabei and colleagues reviewed data from 13 625 patients 65 years of age and older with cancer who had been admitted to nursing homes after hospitalization between 1992 and 1995. Of these patients, 4003 reported having daily pain, and 1019 of the patients with daily pain (26%) received no analgesic agent over the 7-day study period (17). Independent risk factors for receiving no analgesic medication included age older than 85 years, cognitive dysfunction, ethnic minority status, and prescription of 11 or more medications.
Inadequate analgesia for ambulatory patients with metastatic cancer was demonstrated in a study of outpatients (18) who received care at treatment centers affiliated with the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Researchers found that 42% of patients with pain (250 of 597 with complete data) received inadequate analgesic medication according to World Health Organization guidelines for analgesic use in cancer pain (19) (which were endorsed by the Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research [20]). Age older than 70 years was a significant predictor (odds ratio, 2.4) of inadequate pain management.
The optimal interval for screening vulnerable elders for painful conditions has not been studied. The ACOVE expert panel reviewing the literature on this subject recommended 2 years as the maximum interval between screenings.

Quality Indicator 3

History and Physical Examination for Pain

IF a vulnerable elder has a newly reported chronic painful condition, THEN a targeted history and physical examination should be initiated within 1 month BECAUSE appropriate treatment of the condition and pain management require that the nature of the condition be understood.
Supporting Evidence. Many causes of pain can be identified only by performing a careful history and physical examination. A specific diagnosis may lead to successful treatment of the underlying condition or to determination of prognosis (21). This approach also facilitates use of appropriate therapies for pain of specific origins (such as antidepressants or anticonvulsants for neuropathic pain), which, in turn, increases the probability of pain control.
A small study of the treatment of chronic painful diabetic neuropathy (22) exemplifies this approach. In this nonrandomized trial, pain was classified as superficial, muscular, or deep in 75 patients with diabetes mellitus who had chronic, painful diabetic neuropathy and had experienced symptoms for longer than 12 months. Each level of pain was treated differently: Imipramine, with or without mexiletine, was given for deep pain; stretching exercises and metaxalone, sometimes supplemented with piroxicam, were prescribed for muscular pain; and capsaicin was given for superficial pain. Patients receiving this stepped approach were compared with a control group receiving usual care. Among patients receiving the stepped treatment approach, 21% became free of pain, 66% showed improvement, and 13% were unchanged at the end of 3 months. On a graphic pain rating scale of 0 (no pain) to 19 (worst pain imaginable), patients reported scores that decreased by a mean (±SD) of 5.2 ± 0.7, 6.8 ± 0.7, and 6.4 ± 0.6 points in the superficial pain, deep pain, and muscular pain groups, respectively; in contrast, scores did not change appreciably in the control group. All three intervention groups had significantly less pain at the end of the 3 months compared with the control group (P < 0.001).

Quality Indicator 4

Addressing Risks of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs

IF a vulnerable elder has been prescribed a cyclooxygenase nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) for the treatment of chronic pain, THEN the medical record should indicate whether he or she has a history of peptic ulcer disease and, if a history is present, justification of NSAID use should be documented BECAUSE older patients with a history of peptic ulcer disease who receive NSAIDs are at significant risk for recurrent disease and complications.
Supporting Evidence. Use of NSAIDs is associated with upper gastrointestinal ulcers and bleeding, and the risk for these complications increases greatly with increasing age. A case–control study (23) comparing 1415 elderly patients with 7063 controls in the Tennessee Medicaid program estimated a relative risk of 4.1 for peptic ulcer disease among those taking nonaspirin NSAIDs compared with nonusers. In this study, the risk for peptic ulcer disease increased in a dose-dependent manner with NSAID dose, and the relative risk for ulcer disease increased significantly with increasing age.
In the United Kingdom, a population-based case–control study (24) of 1457 persons with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and 10 000 controls documented in general practitioner records found an adjusted relative risk of 4.7 (95% CI, 3.8 to 5.7) for upper gastrointestinal bleeding among current NSAID users; among NSAID users, the risk was greater for patients older than 70 years of age (relative risk, 5.6 [CI, 4.6 to 6.9]). A history of upper gastrointestinal bleeding was the most important predictor of subsequent upper gastrointestinal bleeding (relative risk, 13.5 [CI, 10.3 to 17.7]). In another retrospective study (25), a nested case–control investigation, NSAID use was more frequent among patients who died in the hospital after having gastrointestinal hemorrhage caused by a peptic ulcer compared with in-hospital deaths from other causes. When matched with controls, patients who died of upper gastrointestinal bleeding were more likely than those who died of other causes to have filled a prescription for an NSAID within the preceding 30 days (adjusted odds ratio, 4.7 [CI, 3.1 to 7.2]).

Quality Indicator 5

Prevention of Constipation in Patients Using Opioid Analgesics

IF a vulnerable elder with chronic pain is treated with opioids, THEN he or she should be offered a bowel regimen, or the medical record should document the potential for constipation or explain why bowel treatment is not needed BECAUSE opiate analgesics produce constipation that may cause severe discomfort and may contribute to inadequate pain treatment because patients may then minimize analgesic use.
Supporting Evidence. No randomized clinical trials have addressed treatment of constipation caused by opioid analgesic use, but expert consensus opinion recognizes both the frequency with which constipation occurs and the need for a prophylactic bowel regimen (4, 20, 26–28). Immobility and dehydration, which are common in older people with pain, further increase the risk for constipation.

Quality Indicator 6

Treating Pain

IF a vulnerable elder has a newly reported chronic painful condition, THEN treatment should be offered BECAUSE treatment may provide significant relief and improve quality of life and health status.
Supporting Evidence. Although it may be unrealistic to expect complete pain relief for all patients with chronic pain, some pain relief is possible for nearly all patients, and analgesic drugs are safe and effective in older persons (29). A literature review of randomized, placebo-controlled trials demonstrated significant benefits of treatment of chronic pain in older patients, particularly those with chronic musculoskeletal pain (30–32) and those with neuropathic pain (33–35). Epidemiologic data from the Iowa 65+ Rural Health Study (11) demonstrated a strong association between chronic pain and adverse consequences, including impaired ambulation and increased health care utilization. These findings, combined with evidence for undertreatment of pain (18), suggest that more attention to treatment may ameliorate pain and its consequences (11, 36).

Quality Indicator 7

Reassessment of Pain Control

IF a vulnerable elder is treated for a chronic painful condition, THEN he or she should be assessed for a response within 6 months BECAUSE initial treatment is often incompletely successful, and reassessment may be needed to achieve the most favorable outcome.
Supporting Evidence. No direct evidence supports routine reassessment of pain management. However, the heterogeneity of response to specific treatments (4); the range of potential toxicity from long-term therapies (4, 23, 24, 26, 28, 37); and the general approach of sound clinical practice, which demands follow-up investigation regardless of whether an intervention has been helpful (38), all indicate the importance of follow-up of pain treatment. In addition, long-term use of most pharmacologic analgesic treatments has substantial adverse effects, and treatment should be continued only if necessary. Without reassessment, changes in pharmacologic treatment and detection of lack of response (which might suggest the wrong diagnosis or the need for a change in treatment) are unlikely.

Discussion

Chronic pain imposes a substantial burden on individuals and on the health care system. Vulnerable elders are at increased risk for chronic pain and associated morbidity and, in turn, reduced quality of life. Older patients with chronic pain are at risk for pain that goes unrecognized and untreated. Improvements in processes of care for this high-risk group may substantially reduce disease burden and improve patient outcomes. Seven indicators of these care processes were judged sufficiently valid for use as measures of the quality of chronic pain management in vulnerable elders. These indicators can potentially serve as a basis to compare the care provided by different health care delivery systems and changes in care over time.

References

  1. Crook
    J
    Rideout
    E
    Browne
    G
    The prevalence of pain complaints in a general population
    Pain
    1984
    18
    299-314
     PubMed
  2. Ferrell
    BA
    Ferrell
    BR
    Osterweil
    D
    Pain in the nursing home
    J Am Geriatr Soc
    1990
    38
    409-14
     PubMed
  3. Roy
    R
    Thomas
    M
    A survey of chronic pain in an elderly population
    Can Fam Physician
    1986
    32
    513-6
  4. American Geriatrics Society
    The management of chronic pain in older persons: AGS Panel on Chronic Pain in Older Persons
    J Am Geriatr Soc
    1998
    46
    635-51
     PubMed
  5. Magni
    G
    Marchetti
    M
    Moreschi
    C
    Merskey
    H
    Luchini
    SR
    Chronic musculoskeletal pain and depressive symptoms in the National Health and Nutrition Examination. I. Epidemiologic follow-up study
    Pain
    1993
    53
    163-8
     PubMed
  6. Magni
    G
    Caldieron
    C
    Rigatti-Luchini
    S
    Merskey
    H
    Chronic musculoskeletal pain and depressive symptoms in the general population. An analysis of the 1st National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data
    Pain
    1990
    43
    299-307
     PubMed
  7. Parmelee
    PA
    Katz
    IR
    Lawton
    MP
    The relation of pain to depression among institutionalized aged
    J Gerontol
    1991
    46
    P15-21
     PubMed
  8. Practice guidelines for chronic pain management. A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Pain Management, Chronic Pain Section
    Anesthesiology
    1997
    86
    995-1004
     PubMed
  9. Cooner
    E
    Amorosi
    S
    The Study of Pain and Older Americans. Study conducted for the National Council on Aging. Study No. 628200
    New York
    Louis Harris
    1997
  10. Shekelle
    PG
    MacLean
    CH
    Morton
    SC
    Wenger
    NS
    Assessing care of vulnerable elders: methods for developing quality indicators
    Ann Intern Med
    2001
    135
    647-52
  11. Lavsky-Shulan
    M
    Wallace
    RB
    Kohout
    FJ
    Lemke
    JH
    Morris
    MC
    Smith
    IM
    Prevalence and functional correlates of low back pain in the elderly: the Iowa 65+ Rural Health Study
    J Am Geriatr Soc
    1985
    33
    23-8
     PubMed
  12. Mobily
    PR
    Herr
    KA
    Clark
    MK
    Wallace
    RB
    An epidemiologic analysis of pain in the elderly: the Iowa 65+ Rural Health Study
    J Aging Health
    1994
    6
    139-54
  13. Anderson S, Worm-Petersen J. The prevalence of persistent pain in a Danish population [Abstract]. Proceedings of the Fifth World Congress on Pain. Pain. 1987; (4 Suppl):S332.
  14. Brochet
    B
    Michel
    P
    Barberger-Gateau
    P
    Dartigues
    JF
    Population-based study of pain in elderly people: a descriptive survey
    Age Ageing
    1998
    27
    279-84
  15. Brattberg
    G
    Thorslund
    M
    Wikman
    A
    The prevalence of pain in a general population. The results of a postal survey in a county of Sweden
    Pain
    1989
    37
    215-22
     PubMed
  16. Davis
    MA
    Epidemiology of osteoarthritis
    Clin Geriatr Med
    1988
    4
    241-55
     PubMed
  17. Bernabei
    R
    Gambassi
    G
    Lapane
    K
    Landi
    F
    Gatsonis
    C
    Dunlop
    R
    et al.
    Management of pain in elderly patients with cancer. SAGE Study Group. Systematic Assessment of Geriatric Drug Use via Epidemiology
    JAMA
    1998
    279
    1877-82
     PubMed
  18. Cleeland
    CS
    Gonin
    R
    Hatfield
    AK
    Edmonson
    JH
    Blum
    RH
    Stewart
    JA
    et al.
    Pain and its treatment in outpatients with metastatic cancer
    N Engl J Med
    1994
    330
    592-6
     PubMed
  19. Cancer Pain Relief
    Geneva
    World Health Organization
    1986
  20. U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Management of Cancer Pain. Management of Cancer Pain Guideline Panel. Clinical Practice Guideline No. 9. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1994. AHCPR publication no. 94-0592.
  21. Foley
    KM
    Pain management in the elderly.
    Hazzard WR, Bierman EL, Blass JP, Ettiinger WH, Halter JB
    Principles of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology. 3rd ed
    New York
    McGraw-Hill, Health Professions Division
    1994
    317-31
  22. Pfeifer
    MA
    Ross
    DR
    Schrage
    JP
    Gelber
    DA
    Schumer
    MP
    Crain
    GM
    et al.
    A highly successful and novel model for treatment of chronic painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy
    Diabetes Care
    1993
    16
    1103-15
     PubMed
  23. Griffin
    MR
    Piper
    JM
    Daugherty
    JR
    Snowden
    M
    Ray
    WA
    Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and increased risk for peptic ulcer disease in elderly persons
    Ann Intern Med
    1991
    114
    257-63
     PubMed
  24. García Rodríguez
    LA
    Jick
    H
    Risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation associated with individual non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
    Lancet
    1994
    343
    769-72
     PubMed
  25. Griffin
    MR
    Ray
    WA
    Schaffner
    W
    Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and death from peptic ulcer in elderly persons
    Ann Intern Med
    1988
    109
    359-63
     PubMed
  26. Ellison
    NM
    Opioid analgesics: toxicities and their treatments.
    Patt RB
    Cancer Pain
    Philadelphia
    Lippincott
    1993
    185-94
  27. Glare
    P
    Lickiss
    JN
    Unrecognized constipation in patients with advanced cancer: a recipe for therapeutic disaster
    J Pain Symptom Manage
    1992
    7
    369-71
     PubMed
  28. Rogers
    M
    Cerda
    JJ
    The narcotic bowel syndrome
    J Clin Gastroenterol
    1989
    11
    132-5
     PubMed
  29. Popp
    B
    Portenoy
    RK
    Management of chronic pain in the elderly: Pharmacology of opioids and other analgesic drugs.
    Ferrell B, Ferrell BA
    Pain in the Elderly. A Report of the Task Force on Pain in the Elderly of the International Association for the Study of Pain
    Seattle
    IASP Pr
    1996
    21-34
  30. Ferrell
    BA
    Josephson
    KR
    Pollan
    AM
    Loy
    S
    Ferrell
    BR
    A randomized trial of walking versus physical methods for chronic pain management
    Aging (Milano)
    1997
    9
    99-105
     PubMed
  31. Ettinger
    WH
    Jr
    Burns
    R
    Messier
    SP
    Applegate
    W
    Rejeski
    WJ
    Morgan
    T
    et al.
    A randomized trial comparing aerobic exercise and resistance exercise with a health education program in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. The Fitness Arthritis and Seniors Trial (FAST)
    JAMA
    1997
    277
    25-31
     PubMed
  32. Hameroff
    SR
    Weiss
    JL
    Lerman
    JC
    Cork
    RC
    Watts
    KS
    Crago
    BR
    et al.
    Doxepin's effects on chronic pain and depression: a controlled study
    J Clin Psychiatry
    1984
    45
    47-53
     PubMed
  33. Max
    MB
    Lynch
    SA
    Muir
    J
    Shoaf
    SE
    Smoller
    B
    Dubner
    R
    Effects of desipramine, amitriptyline, and fluoxetine on pain in diabetic neuropathy
    N Engl J Med
    1992
    326
    1250-6
     PubMed
  34. Max
    MB
    Kishore-Kumar
    R
    Schafer
    SC
    Meister
    B
    Gracely
    RH
    Smoller
    B
    et al.
    Efficacy of desipramine in painful diabetic neuropathy: a placebo-controlled trial
    Pain
    1991
    45
    3-9
     PubMed
  35. Panerai
    AE
    Monza
    G
    Movilia
    P
    Bianchi
    M
    Francucci
    BM
    Tiengo
    M
    A randomized, within-patient, cross-over, placebo-controlled trial on the efficacy and tolerability of the tricyclic antidepressants chlorimipramine and nortriptyline in central pain
    Acta Neurol Scand
    1990
    82
    34-8
     PubMed
  36. Becker
    N
    Bondegaard Thomsen
    A
    Olsen
    AK
    Sjøgren
    P
    Bech
    P
    Eriksen
    J
    Pain epidemiology and health related quality of life in chronic non-malignant pain patients referred to a Danish multidisciplinary pain center
    Pain
    1997
    73
    393-400
     PubMed
  37. Gurwitz
    JH
    Avorn
    J
    Ross-Degnan
    D
    Lipsitz
    LA
    Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated azotemia in the very old
    JAMA
    1990
    264
    471-5
     PubMed
  38. Dietrich
    AJ
    Marton
    KI
    Does continuous care from a physician make a difference?
    J Fam Pract
    1982
    15
    929-37
     PubMed

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

This feature is available only to Registered Users

Subscribe/Learn More
Submit a Comment

0 Comments

PDF
Not Available
Citations
Citation

Chodosh J, Ferrell BA, Shekelle PG, et al. Quality Indicators for Pain Management in Vulnerable Elders. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:731–735. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-135-8_Part_2-200110161-00012

Download citation file:

  • Ris (Zotero)
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • Medlars
  • ProCite
  • RefWorks
  • Reference Manager

© 2019

×
Permissions

Published: Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(8_Part_2):731-735.

DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-8_Part_2-200110161-00012

24 Citations

See Also

ACOVE Quality Indicators
View MoreView Less

Related Articles

Literacy-Adapted Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Education for Chronic Pain at Low-Income Clinics: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Annals of Internal Medicine; 168 (7): 471-480
The Effects of Cannabis Among Adults With Chronic Pain and an Overview of General Harms: A Systematic Review
Annals of Internal Medicine; 167 (5): 319-331
National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention Workshop: The Role of Opioids in the Treatment of Chronic Pain
Annals of Internal Medicine; 162 (4): 295-300
Pharmacologic Interventions for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: An Umbrella Systematic Review and Comparative Effectiveness Network Meta-analysis
Annals of Internal Medicine; 161 (9): 639-649
View MoreView Less

Journal Club

Review: In neuropathy, fibromyalgia, or chronic pain, duloxetine reduces pain but increases adverse events
Annals of Internal Medicine; 160 (8): JC12
Review: Pregabalin and other drugs reduce pain in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy
Annals of Internal Medicine; 155 (10): JC5-8
IV prochlorperazine + diphenhydramine improved migraine pain relief more than IV hydromorphone in the ED
Annals of Internal Medicine; 168 (6): JC28
Guideline: Experts recommend a single dose of oral steroids for pain relief in acute sore throat
Annals of Internal Medicine; 168 (2): JC2
View MoreView Less

Related Point of Care

Osteoarthritis
Annals of Internal Medicine; 147 (3): ITC8-1
Sickle Cell Disease
Annals of Internal Medicine; 155 (5): ITC3-1
Herpes Zoster
Annals of Internal Medicine; 154 (5): ITC3-1
Palliative Care
Annals of Internal Medicine; 168 (5): ITC33-ITC48
View MoreView Less

Related Topics

Gastroenterology/Hepatology
Geriatric Medicine

Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Geriatric Medicine.

PubMed Articles

Comparison of efficacy between natural orifice specimen extraction without abdominal incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of sigmoid colon cancer and upper rectal cancer.
J BUON ;24(5):1817-1823.
Evaluation of quality of life outcomes following palliative radiotherapy in bone metastases: A literature review.
J BUON ;24(5):1747-1760.
View More

Results provided by: PubMed

CME/MOC Activity Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
The Comments Feature Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
link to top

Content

  • Home
  • Latest
  • Issues
  • Channels
  • CME/MOC
  • In the Clinic
  • Journal Club
  • Web Exclusives

Information For

  • Author Info
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Readers
  • Institutions / Libraries / Agencies
  • Advertisers

Services

  • Subscribe
  • Renew
  • Alerts
  • Current Issue RSS
  • Latest RSS
  • In the Clinic RSS
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • Help
  • About Annals
  • About Mobile
  • Patient Information
  • Teaching Tools
  • Annals in the News
  • Share Your Feedback

Awards and Cover

  • Personae (Cover Photo)
  • Junior Investigator Awards
  • Poetry Prize

Other Resources

  • ACP Online
  • Career Connection
  • ACP Advocate Blog
  • ACP Journal Wise

Follow Annals On

  • Twitter Link
  • Facebook Link
acp link acp
silverchair link silverchair

Copyright © 2019 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704

Privacy Policy

|

Conditions of Use

This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. | Accept
×

You need a subscription to this content to use this feature.

×
PDF Downloads Require Access to the Full Article.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN
Open Athens|Shibboleth|Log In
Annals of Internal Medicine
PURCHASE OPTIONS
Buy This Article|Subscribe
You will be redirected to acponline.org to sign-in to Annals to complete your purchase.
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
Access to this Free Content Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In. Please Choose One of the Following Options
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×