Skip Navigation
American College of Physicians Logo
  • Subscribe
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Sign In
    Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
    INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
    Sign In|Set Up Account
    You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
    INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN
    Open Athens|Shibboleth|Log In
    Annals of Internal Medicine
    SUBSCRIBE
    Subscribe to Annals of Internal Medicine.
    You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your purchase.
Annals of Internal Medicine Logo Menu
  • Latest
  • Issues
  • Channels
  • CME/MOC
  • In the Clinic
  • Journal Club
  • Web Exclusives
  • Author Info
Advanced Search
  • ‹ PREV ARTICLE
  • This Issue
  • NEXT ARTICLE ›
Summaries for Patients |16 April 2002

Identifying People at High Risk for Type 2 Diabetes

Article, Author, and Disclosure Information
Author, Article, and Disclosure Information
  • The summary below is from the full report titled “Identification of Persons at High Risk for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Do We Need the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test?” It is in the 16 April 2002 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 136, pages 575-581). The authors are MP Stern, K Williams, and SM Haffner.


Summaries for Patients are a service provided by Annals to help patients better understand the complicated and often mystifying language of modern medicine.
Summaries for Patients are presented for informational purposes only. These summaries are not a substitute for advice from your own medical provider. If you have questions about this material, or need medical advice about your own health or situation, please contact your physician. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine.
×
  • ‹ PREV ARTICLE
  • This Issue
  • NEXT ARTICLE ›
Jump To
  • Full Article
  • FULL ARTICLE
  • FULL ARTICLE
    • What is the problem and what is known about it so far?
    • Why did the researchers do this particular study?
    • Who was studied?
    • How was the study done?
    • What did the researchers find?
    • What were the limitations of the study?
    • What are the implications of the study?
  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplements
  • Audio/Video
  • Summary for Patients
  • Clinical Slide Sets
  • CME / MOC
  • Comments
  • Twitter Link
  • Facebook Link
  • Email Link
More
  • LinkedIn Link
  • CiteULike Link

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

Type 2 diabetes mellitus, also known as adult-onset diabetes, is a common disease that interferes with the body's ability to use sugar, resulting in high levels in the blood. Over time, high blood sugar levels can lead to complications such as blindness, kidney failure, and heart disease. Diet, exercise, or medications can prevent people who are at high risk for type 2 diabetes from developing the disease. The standard way of identifying people at risk for type 2 diabetes is to measure blood sugar levels 2 hours after a standard amount of sugar is consumed. This test is called an oral glucose tolerance test, and it is inconvenient and costly. Easier and less costly ways of identifying people who might benefit from strategies to prevent diabetes would be useful.

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

To see whether a mathematical model that uses readily available medical information can predict who is likely to develop diabetes as accurately as an oral glucose tolerance test does.

Who was studied?

1791 Mexican Americans and 1112 non-Hispanic white people who did not have diabetes when they were enrolled in the study.

How was the study done?

The researchers collected information about each patient's medical history, blood pressure, body size, cholesterol levels, and sugar levels (during fasting and during an oral glucose tolerance test). They followed the participants to see who developed diabetes over the next 7.5 years. Then, the researchers developed three mathematical models. The first model used only oral glucose tolerance test results. The second model used only the other medical information (clinical model). The third model used both the oral glucose tolerance test results and the medical information.

What did the researchers find?

The model that used only the medical information was much better at predicting who would develop diabetes than the model that used only the oral glucose tolerance results. Adding the oral glucose tolerance test results to the clinical model improved prediction only slightly.

What were the limitations of the study?

This study included many Mexican Americans, who have a higher risk for type 2 diabetes than many other ethnic groups. Before such a model could be used widely, similar results would need to be demonstrated in more diverse sets of people. In addition, the mathematical models would need to be translated for use on doctors' own computers.

What are the implications of the study?

A mathematical model that uses readily available medical information may prove to be a good way to identify patients at risk for type 2 diabetes while avoiding the cost and inconvenience of oral glucose tolerance tests.

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

This feature is available only to Registered Users

Subscribe/Learn More
Submit a Comment

0 Comments

PDF
Not Available
Citations
Citation

Identifying People at High Risk for Type 2 Diabetes. Ann Intern Med. ;136:I–29. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-8-200204160-00002

Download citation file:

  • Ris (Zotero)
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • Medlars
  • ProCite
  • RefWorks
  • Reference Manager

© 2019

×
Permissions

Published: Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(8):I-29.

DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-8-200204160-00002

©
2002 American College of Physicians
0 Citations

See Also

Identification of Persons at High Risk for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Do We Need the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test?
View MoreView Less

Related Articles

Protocol-based nurse management of type 2 diabetes did not differ from usual GP care for HbA1c levels
Annals of Internal Medicine; 155 (6): JC3-7
Effect of Antihyperglycemic Agents Added to Metformin and a Sulfonylurea on Glycemic Control and Weight Gain in Type 2 Diabetes: A Network Meta-analysis
Annals of Internal Medicine; 154 (10): 672-679
Update in Endocrinology: Evidence Published in 2010
Annals of Internal Medicine; 154 (10): 684-689
Effects of Aerobic Training, Resistance Training, or Both on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial
Annals of Internal Medicine; 147 (6): 357-369
View MoreView Less

Journal Club

Protocol-based nurse management of type 2 diabetes did not differ from usual GP care for HbA1c levels
Annals of Internal Medicine; 155 (6): JC3-7
View MoreView Less

Related Point of Care

Type 2 Diabetes
Annals of Internal Medicine; 162 (5): ITC1
Type 2 Diabetes
Annals of Internal Medicine; 152 (5): ITC3-1
Type 2 Diabetes
Annals of Internal Medicine; 146 (1): ITC1-1
Diabetic Ketoacidosis
Annals of Internal Medicine; 152 (1): ITC1-1
View MoreView Less

Related Topics

Cardiology
Coronary Risk Factors
Diabetes
Endocrine and Metabolism

Cardiology, Coronary Risk Factors, Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolism.

PubMed Articles

The Modified 5-item Frailty Index (mFI-5) - a concise and useful tool for assessing the impact of frailty on post-operative morbidity following elective posterior lumbar fusions (PLF).
World Neurosurg 2019.
Uropathogens antibiotic resistance patterns among type 2 diabetic patients in Kisii Teaching and Referral Hospital, Kenya.
Pan Afr Med J 2018;30():286.
View More

Results provided by: PubMed

CME/MOC Activity Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
The Comments Feature Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
link to top

Content

  • Home
  • Latest
  • Issues
  • Channels
  • CME/MOC
  • In the Clinic
  • Journal Club
  • Web Exclusives

Information For

  • Author Info
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Readers
  • Institutions / Libraries / Agencies
  • Advertisers

Services

  • Subscribe
  • Renew
  • Alerts
  • Current Issue RSS
  • Latest RSS
  • In the Clinic RSS
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • Help
  • About Annals
  • About Mobile
  • Patient Information
  • Teaching Tools
  • Annals in the News
  • Share Your Feedback

Awards and Cover

  • Personae (Cover Photo)
  • Junior Investigator Awards
  • Poetry Prize

Other Resources

  • ACP Online
  • Career Connection
  • ACP Advocate Blog
  • ACP Journal Wise

Follow Annals On

  • Twitter Link
  • Facebook Link
acp link acp
silverchair link silverchair

Copyright © 2019 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704

Privacy Policy

|

Conditions of Use

This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. | Accept
×

You need a subscription to this content to use this feature.

×
PDF Downloads Require Access to the Full Article.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN
Open Athens|Shibboleth|Log In
Annals of Internal Medicine
PURCHASE OPTIONS
Buy This Article|Subscribe
You will be redirected to acponline.org to sign-in to Annals to complete your purchase.
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
Access to this Free Content Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In. Please Choose One of the Following Options
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×