Skip Navigation
American College of Physicians Logo
  • Subscribe
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Sign In
    Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
    INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
    Sign In|Set Up Account
    You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
    INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN
    Open Athens|Shibboleth|Log In
    Annals of Internal Medicine
    SUBSCRIBE
    Subscribe to Annals of Internal Medicine.
    You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your purchase.
Annals of Internal Medicine Logo Menu
  • Latest
  • Issues
  • Channels
  • CME/MOC
  • In the Clinic
  • Journal Club
  • Web Exclusives
  • Author Info
Advanced Search
  • ‹ PREV ARTICLE
  • This Issue
  • NEXT ARTICLE ›
Summaries for Patients |2 September 2008

Comparison of Patient- and Physician-Collected Specimens to Screen for Anal Cancer

Article, Author, and Disclosure Information
Author, Article, and Disclosure Information
  • The summary below is from the full report titled “Comparison of Patient- and Clinician-Collected Anal Cytology Samples to Screen for Human Papillomavirus–Associated Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Men Who Have Sex with Men.” It is in the 2 September 2008 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine (volume 149, pages 300-306). The authors are P.V. Chin-Hong, J.M. Berry, S.C. Cheng, J.A. Catania, M. Da Costa, T.M. Darragh, F. Fishman, N. Jay, L.M. Pollack, and J.M. Palefsky.


Summaries for Patients are a service provided by Annals to help patients better understand the complicated and often mystifying language of modern medicine.
Summaries for Patients are presented for informational purposes only. These summaries are not a substitute for advice from your own medical provider. If you have questions about this material, or need medical advice about your own health or situation, please contact your physician. The summaries may be reproduced for not-for-profit educational purposes only. Any other uses must be approved by the American College of Physicians.
×
  • ‹ PREV ARTICLE
  • This Issue
  • NEXT ARTICLE ›
Jump To
  • Full Article
  • FULL ARTICLE
  • FULL ARTICLE
    • What is the problem and what is known about it so far?
    • Why did the researchers do this particular study?
    • Who was studied?
    • How was the study done?
    • What did the researchers find?
    • What were the limitations of the study?
    • What are the implications of the study?
  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplements
  • Audio/Video
  • Summary for Patients
  • Clinical Slide Sets
  • CME / MOC
  • Comments
  • Twitter Link
  • Facebook Link
  • Email Link
More
  • LinkedIn Link

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

Anal cancer is associated with a virus (human papillomavirus, or HPV). HPV spreads through sexual contact and can produce abnormal cells that can become cancer. Men who have sex with men are at high risk for getting HPV infection and anal cancer, especially if they also have HIV infection.
One way to find anal cancer at early, treatable stages is to do cytology testing. Cytology testing involves taking a sample of cells from the anus with a swab to examine in a laboratory. Anoscopy is a more definitive but more complicated and uncomfortable test: It involves using a special instrument to look at the lining of the anus so that samples of abnormal areas can be taken for biopsy. “Biopsy” means taking a sample of tissue for examination under a microscope.
Little is known about the best strategy for screening for anal cancer. Cytology followed by anoscopy for people with abnormal cytology results would be 1 option. Patients might be more willing to have this type of screening if they could collect their own specimen rather than having to see a doctor to take the sample. However, to be useful, cytology would need to be accurate enough that you could be pretty certain that anal cancer was not present if the cytology result was normal.

Why did the researchers do this particular study?

To learn more about the usefulness of cytology testing to screen for anal cancer in men who have sex with men.

Who was studied?

126 men in San Francisco who have sex with men. Of the 126 men, 38 reported that they were HIV-positive.

How was the study done?

The researchers gave all of the men supplies and instructions for how to obtain a sample of cells from the anus with a swab and place the sample in a container to bring in for laboratory testing. All of the men also had samples obtained in the doctors' office and had anoscopy. The researchers then compared the result of the cytology tests with the result from anoscopy.

What did the researchers find?

The researchers found that men were able to obtain samples, but the physician-collected samples were more accurate than the patient-collected samples. Unfortunately, many men who had normal cytology results—whether collected by the patient or the doctor—had abnormal results on anoscopy.

What were the limitations of the study?

This study examined only 1-time testing. The tests might pick up abnormalities more accurately when they are performed repeatedly over time.

What are the implications of the study?

Although patient-collected samples to screen for anal cancer might increase the patients' willingness to get screened, cytology testing done as a 1-time test (and not repeated) may not be accurate enough to comfortably recommend that high-risk patients with normal cytology results do not need anoscopy.

Clinical Slide Sets

Terms of Use

The In the Clinic® slide sets are owned and copyrighted by the American College of Physicians (ACP). All text, graphics, trademarks, and other intellectual property incorporated into the slide sets remain the sole and exclusive property of the ACP. The slide sets may be used only by the person who downloads or purchases them and only for the purpose of presenting them during not-for-profit educational activities. Users may incorporate the entire slide set or selected individual slides into their own teaching presentations but may not alter the content of the slides in any way or remove the ACP copyright notice. Users may make print copies for use as hand-outs for the audience the user is personally addressing but may not otherwise reproduce or distribute the slides by any means or media, including but not limited to sending them as e-mail attachments, posting them on Internet or Intranet sites, publishing them in meeting proceedings, or making them available for sale or distribution in any unauthorized form, without the express written permission of the ACP. Unauthorized use of the In the Clinic slide sets will constitute copyright infringement.

This feature is available only to Registered Users

Subscribe/Learn More
Submit a Comment

0 Comments

PDF
Not Available
Citations
Citation

Comparison of Patient- and Physician-Collected Specimens to Screen for Anal Cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:I–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-149-5-200809020-00002

Download citation file:

  • Ris (Zotero)
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • Medlars
  • ProCite
  • RefWorks
  • Reference Manager

© 2019

×
Permissions

Published: Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(5):I-38.

DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-5-200809020-00002

©
2008 American College of Physicians
0 Citations

See Also

Comparison of Patient- and Clinician-Collected Anal Cytology Samples to Screen for Human Papillomavirus–Associated Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Men Who Have Sex with Men
View MoreView Less

Related Articles

High Prevalence of Anal Human Papillomavirus Infection and Anal Cancer Precursors among HIV-Infected Persons in the Absence of Anal Intercourse
Annals of Internal Medicine; 138 (6): 453-459
Anal Cancer Precursors in Persons with HIV Infection
Annals of Internal Medicine; 138 (6): I-44
Update in Gastroenterology
Annals of Internal Medicine; 129 (4): 309-316
View MoreView Less

Related Topics

Colorectal Cancer
Gastroenterology/Hepatology
Gastrointestinal Cancer
Hematology/Oncology

Colorectal Cancer, Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Gastrointestinal Cancer, Hematology/Oncology.

PubMed Articles

Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma: the 3d English Edition [Secondary Publication].
J Anus Rectum Colon 2019;3(4):175-195.
Mechanistic Signatures of Human Papillomavirus Insertions in Anal Squamous Cell Carcinomas.
Cancers (Basel) 2019;11(12):.
View More

Results provided by: PubMed

CME/MOC Activity Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
The Comments Feature Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
link to top

Content

  • Home
  • Latest
  • Issues
  • Channels
  • CME/MOC
  • In the Clinic
  • Journal Club
  • Web Exclusives

Information For

  • Author Info
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Readers
  • Institutions / Libraries / Agencies
  • Advertisers

Services

  • Subscribe
  • Renew
  • Alerts
  • Current Issue RSS
  • Latest RSS
  • In the Clinic RSS
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • Help
  • About Annals
  • About Mobile
  • Patient Information
  • Teaching Tools
  • Annals in the News
  • Share Your Feedback

Awards and Cover

  • Personae (Cover Photo)
  • Junior Investigator Awards
  • Poetry Prize

Other Resources

  • ACP Online
  • Career Connection
  • ACP Advocate Blog
  • ACP Journal Wise

Follow Annals On

  • Twitter Link
  • Facebook Link
acp link acp
silverchair link silverchair

Copyright © 2019 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704

Privacy Policy

|

Conditions of Use

This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. | Accept
×

You need a subscription to this content to use this feature.

×
PDF Downloads Require Access to the Full Article.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN
Open Athens|Shibboleth|Log In
Annals of Internal Medicine
PURCHASE OPTIONS
Buy This Article|Subscribe
You will be redirected to acponline.org to sign-in to Annals to complete your purchase.
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
Access to this Free Content Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In. Please Choose One of the Following Options
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×