Skip Navigation
American College of Physicians Logo
  • Subscribe
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Sign In
    Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
    INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
    Sign In|Set Up Account
    You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
    INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN
    Open Athens|Shibboleth|Log In
    Annals of Internal Medicine
    SUBSCRIBE
    Subscribe to Annals of Internal Medicine.
    You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your purchase.
Annals of Internal Medicine Logo Menu
  • Latest
  • Issues
  • Channels
  • CME/MOC
  • In the Clinic
  • Journal Club
  • Web Exclusives
  • Author Info
Advanced Search
  • ‹ PREV ARTICLE
  • This Issue
  • NEXT ARTICLE ›
Summaries for Patients |21 October 2008

Health Care Strategies to Promote Breastfeeding: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations

  • ‹ PREV ARTICLE
  • This Issue
  • NEXT ARTICLE ›
Jump To
  • Full Article
  • FULL ARTICLE
  • FULL ARTICLE
    • Who developed these guidelines?
    • What is the problem and what is known about it so far?
    • How did the USPSTF develop these recommendations?
    • What did the authors find?
    • What does the USPSTF recommend that doctors and patients do?
    • What are the cautions related to these recommendations?
  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplements
  • Audio/Video
  • Summary for Patients
  • Clinical Slide Sets
  • CME / MOC
  • Comments
  • Twitter Link
  • Facebook Link
  • Email Link
More
  • LinkedIn Link

Who developed these guidelines?

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is a group of health experts that makes recommendations about preventive health care.

What is the problem and what is known about it so far?

Breastfeeding has health advantages for both children and their mothers. Evidence shows that babies who are breastfed have fewer infections and allergic skin rashes than formula-fed babies and are also less likely to have sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). After breastfeeding ends, children who were breastfed are less likely to develop asthma, diabetes, obesity, and childhood leukemia. Women who breastfeed have a lower risk for type 2 diabetes, breast cancer, and ovarian cancer than women who have never breastfed. For these reasons, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommend breastfeeding as the preferred choice for feeding babies. However, a 2002 survey showed that only 71% of American children had ever been breastfed, only 35% were breastfed at 6 months of age, and only 16% were breastfed at 12 months of age.
The USPSTF wanted to find out what is known about whether strategies in health care settings to promote breastfeeding actually increase the chance that women will choose to breastfeed. They also wanted to see whether there was evidence of harms related to these strategies.

How did the USPSTF develop these recommendations?

The USPSTF reviewed published research on strategies used by physicians, nurses, midwives, or counselors to increase breastfeeding in developed countries.

What did the authors find?

The authors found 1 large, good-quality study, conducted in Belarus, that demonstrated that hospital practices that support breastfeeding improve health outcomes for infants. They also found 36 studies that addressed whether strategies increased the numbers of women who chose to breastfeed. In summary, these studies showed that several different strategies to promote breastfeeding increased breastfeeding rates. Strategies that contacted women before and after delivery were more effective than those that involved only one of these periods. Although the authors found no studies that investigated potential harms associated with strategies to promote breastfeeding, their opinion was that the potential harms, if any, were probably small.

What does the USPSTF recommend that doctors and patients do?

The USPSTF recommends that health care settings use strategies that work with women and families both before and after delivery to encourage and support breastfeeding.

What are the cautions related to these recommendations?

The available studies used different strategies to promote and support breastfeeding, and the authors could not determine which specific type of strategies increase breastfeeding the most. In rare circumstances, such as when mothers have HIV or infants have galactosemia, breastfeeding may not be appropriate. Breastfeeding does not guarantee that babies and mothers will not develop the previously mentioned health problems.

This feature is available only to Registered Users

Subscribe/Learn More
Submit a Comment

0 Comments

PDF
Not Available
Citations
Citation

Health Care Strategies to Promote Breastfeeding: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:I–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-149-8-200810210-00003

Download citation file:

  • Ris (Zotero)
  • EndNote
  • BibTex
  • Medlars
  • ProCite
  • RefWorks
  • Reference Manager

© 2020

×
Permissions

Published: Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(8):I-52.

DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-8-200810210-00003

0 Citations
Advertisement

See Also
Primary Care Interventions to Promote Breastfeeding: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
Interventions in Primary Care to Promote Breastfeeding: An Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
View MoreView Less

Related Articles
Primary Care Interventions to Promote Breastfeeding: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
Annals of Internal Medicine; 149 (8): 560-564
Interventions in Primary Care to Promote Breastfeeding: An Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Annals of Internal Medicine; 149 (8): 565-582
Reducing Risk for Mother-to-Infant Transmission of Hepatitis C Virus: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Annals of Internal Medicine; 158 (2): 109-113
Screening for Prostate Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
Annals of Internal Medicine; 157 (2): I-44
View MoreView Less

Journal Club
Accessing preappraised evidence: fine-tuning the 5S model into a 6S model
Annals of Internal Medicine; 151 (6): JC3-2
View MoreView Less

Related Topics
Prevention/Screening

Prevention/Screening.

PubMed Articles
'Think Hep B' in primary care: A before-and-after evaluation of a self-guided learning package.
Aust J Gen Pract ;49(1-2):66-69.
Serum osmolarity as a potential predictor for contrast-induced nephropathy following elective coronary angiography.
Int Urol Nephrol 2020.
View More

Results provided by: PubMed

Advertisement
CME/MOC Activity Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
The Comments Feature Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
link to top

Content

  • Home
  • Latest
  • Issues
  • Channels
  • CME/MOC
  • In the Clinic
  • Journal Club
  • Web Exclusives

Information For

  • Author Info
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Readers
  • Institutions / Libraries / Agencies
  • Advertisers

Services

  • Subscribe
  • Renew
  • Alerts
  • Current Issue RSS
  • Latest RSS
  • In the Clinic RSS
  • Reprints & Permissions
  • Contact Us
  • Help
  • About Annals
  • About Mobile
  • Patient Information
  • Teaching Tools
  • Annals in the News
  • Share Your Feedback

Awards and Cover

  • Personae (Cover Photo)
  • Junior Investigator Awards
  • Poetry Prize

Other Resources

  • ACP Online
  • Career Connection
  • ACP Advocate Blog
  • ACP Journal Wise

Follow Annals On

  • Twitter Link
  • Facebook Link
acp link acp
silverchair link silverchair

Copyright © 2020 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.

Print ISSN: 0003-4819 | Online ISSN: 1539-3704

Privacy Policy

|

Conditions of Use

This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. | Accept
×

You need a subscription to this content to use this feature.

×
PDF Downloads Require Access to the Full Article.
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
INSTITUTIONAL SIGN IN
Open Athens|Shibboleth|Log In
Annals of Internal Medicine
PURCHASE OPTIONS
Buy This Article|Subscribe
You will be redirected to acponline.org to sign-in to Annals to complete your purchase.
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×
Access to this Free Content Requires Users to be Registered and Logged In. Please Choose One of the Following Options
Sign in below to access your subscription for full content
INDIVIDUAL SIGN IN
Sign In|Set Up Account
You will be directed to acponline.org to register and create your Annals account
Annals of Internal Medicine
CREATE YOUR FREE ACCOUNT
Create Your Free Account|Why?
To receive access to the full text of freely available articles, alerts, and more. You will be directed to acponline.org to complete your registration.
×